skip to main content
research-article

Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? Collective Sensemaking for the Responsible Use of Sensor Data at Work

Published: 13 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

People are increasingly subject to the tracking of data about them at their workplaces. Sensor tracking is used by organizations to generate data on the movement and interaction of their employees to monitor and manage workers, and yet this data also poses significant risks to individual employees who may face harms from such data, and from data errors, to their job security or pay as a result of such analyses. Working with a large hospital, we developed a set of intervention strategies to enable what we call "collective sensemaking" describing worker contestation of sensor tracking data. We did this by participating in the sensor data science team, analyzing data on badges that employees wore over a two-week period, and then bringing the results back to the employees through a series of participatory workshops. We found three key aspects of collective sensemaking important for understanding data from the perspectives of stakeholders: 1) data shadows for tempering possibilities for design with the realities of data tracking; 2) data transducers for converting our assumptions about sensor tracking, and 3) data power for eliciting worker inclusivity and participation. We argue that researchers face what Dourish (2019) called the "legitimacy trap" when designing with large datasets and that research about work should commit to complementing data-driven studies with in-depth insights to make them useful for all stakeholders as a corrective to the underlying power imbalance that tracked workers face.

References

[1]
Cecilia Aragon, Shion Guha, Marina Kogan, Michael Muller & Gina Neff. (forthcoming). Human Centered Data Science: An Introduction. MIT Press.
[2]
Kirstie Ball. 2010. Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History, 51(1), 87--106.
[3]
Michael R. Berthold, Nicolas Cebron, Fabian Dill, Thomas R. Gabriel, Tobias Kötter, Thorsten Meinl, Peter Ohl, Kilian Thiel & Bernd Wiswedel. 2009. KNIME - the Konstanz information miner: version 2.0 and beyond. SIGKDD Explor. Newsletter, 11(1), 26--31. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. 20:18 Naja Holten Møller et al.
[4]
Christopher M. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer Verlag, New York.
[5]
Pernille Bjørn & Nina Boulus-Rødje. 2015. The multiple intersecting sites of design in CSCW research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW), 24(3): 319--351.
[6]
Pernille Bjørn, Mark Wulff, Mathias Schmidt Petræus, & Naja Holten Møller. 2021. Immersive cooperative work environments (CWE): Designing human-building interaction in virtual reality. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW).
[7]
Jeanette Blomberg & Helena Karasti. 2013. Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW), 22(4--6), 373--423.
[8]
Jeanette Blomberg, Jean Giacomi, Andrea Mosher & Pat Swenton-Hall. 1993. Ethnographic Field Methods and their Relation to Design. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. (ed.) D. Schuler and A. Namioka. London, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 123--155.
[9]
Morten Bonde, Claus Bossen & Peter Danholt. 2019. Data-work and friction: Investigating the practices of repurposing healthcare data. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 558--566.
[10]
Claus Bossen, Lotte Groth Jensen, and Flemming Witt. 2012. Medical secretaries' care of records: the cooperative work of a non-clinical group. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 921--930.
[11]
Claus Bossen, & Martin Foss. 2016. The collaborative work of hospital porters: Accountability, visibility and configurations of work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 965--979.
[12]
Mads Christophersen, Tue Langhoff, & Pernille Bjørn. 2015. Unforseen challenges: Adopting wearable health data tracking devices to reduce health insurance costs in organizations. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 288--299.
[13]
Adrian Clear, Sam Mitchell Finnigan, Patrick Olivier, & Rob Comber. 2017. "I'd want to burn the data or at least nobble the numbers": Towards data-mediated building management for comfort and energy use. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 2448--2461.
[14]
Frank Codd. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6), 377--387.
[15]
Andy Crabtree & Richard Mortier. 2015. Human Data Interaction: Historical lessons from social studies and CSCW. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), 1--20.
[16]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, & Sarah Fox (2016). Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), 656--671.
[17]
Lynn Dombrowski, Adriana Alvarado Garcia & Jessica Despard. 2017. Low-wage precarious workers' sociotechnical practices working towards addressing wage theft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 4585--4598.
[18]
Paul Dourish. 2019. User experience as legitimacy trap. ACM Interactions, December 2019, 46--49.
[19]
Paul Dourish. 2017. The Stuff of Bits. MIT Press.
[20]
Paul Dourish & Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2018. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 1--10.
[21]
Christina Farr. 2020. Some hospitals are tracking Covid-19 by adding sensors to employees' badges. Accessed 12.08.2020 from CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/02/hospitals-tracking-covid-19-with-badge-sensors-swipesense-technology.html
[22]
Brittany Fiore-Gartland & Gina Neff. 2015. Communication, mediation, and the expectations of data: Data valences across health and wellness communities. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1466--1484.
[23]
Nanna Gorm & Irina Shklovski. 2016. Sharing steps in the workplace: Changing privacy concerns over time. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 4315--4319.
[24]
Richard R. Harper. 1992. Looking at ourselves: An examination of the social organization of two research laboratories. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW), 330--337.
[25]
Richard R. Harper, Michael G. Lamming & William M. Newman. 1992. Locating systems at work: Implications for the development of active badge applications. Interacting with Computers 4(3), 343--363.
[26]
Simon Head. 2014. Mindless: Why Smarter Machines are Making Dumber Human. Basic Books.
[27]
Emily D. Heaphy. 2017. "Dancing on hot coals": How emotion work facilitates collective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 642--670.
[28]
Brent Hecht, Lauren Wilcox, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Johannes Schöning, Ehsan Hoque, Jason Ernst, Yonatan Bisk, Luigi De Russis, Lana Yarosh, Bushra Anjum, Danish Contractor & Cathy Wu. 2018. It's time to do something. Mitigating the negative impacts of computing through a change to the peer review process https://elib.suub.uni- bremen.de/edocs/00106471--1.pdf. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? 20:19
[29]
Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2019. Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information, Communication & Society 22(7), 900--915.
[30]
Azra Ismail & Neha Kumar. 2018. Engaging solidarity in data collection practices for community health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2 (CSCW), no. 76.
[31]
Leonard Kaufman & Peter J. Rousseeuw. 1987. Clustering by means of Medoids, in Statistical Data Analysis Based on the l_1--Norm and Related Methods, (ed) by Y. Dodge, 405--416.
[32]
Rob Kitchin. 2014. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1--12.
[33]
Young Ming Kow & Waikuen Cheng. 2018. Complimenting invisible work: Identifying hidden employee contributions through a voluntary, positive and open work review system. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), Article 96.
[34]
Kristian Helbo Kristiansen, Mathias A. Valeur-Meller, Lynn Dombrowski & Naja L. Holten Møller. 2018. Accountability in the blue-collar data-driven workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), paper 332.
[35]
Vladimir I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10 (8), 707--710.
[36]
Adrian MacKenzie. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. A&C Black.
[37]
Gloria Mark, Shamsi T Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski & Paul Johns. 2014. Bored Mondays and focused afternoons: The rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 3025--3034.
[38]
Helena M. Mentis, Anita Komlodi, Katrina Schrader, Michael Phipps, Ann Gruber Baldini, Karen Yarbrough & Lisa Shulman. 2017. Crafting a view of self-tracking data in the clinical visit. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 5800--5812.
[39]
P Shayan Mirjafari, Kizito Masaba, Ted Grover, et al. 2019. Differentiating higher and lower job performers in the workplace using mobile sensing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(2), Article no. 37.
[40]
Phoebe Moore & Andrew Robinson. 2016. The Quantified Self: What Counts in the Neoliberal Workplace. New Media & Society 18(1), 2774 -- 2792.
[41]
Michael Muller, Shion Guha, Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, and Sadat Shami. 2016. Machine Learning and Grounded Theory Method: Convergence, Divergence, and Combination. In Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP), 3--8.
[42]
Naja Holten Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the interaction of administrative and clinical work in the diagnosing process. In J. C. Dugsdale, M.A. Masclet, J.F. Grasso, H.P. Boujut (ed.) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges (COOP), 33--47.
[43]
Naja Holten Møller. 2013. Achieving continuity of care: A study of the challenges in a Danish and a US hospital department. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), 229--247.
[44]
Naja Holten Møller, Irina Shklovski, Six M. Silberman; Lynn Dombrowski, & Airi Lampinen (2017). A constructive- critical approach to the changing workplace and its technologies. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW) Panel.
[45]
Naja Holten Møller, Pernille Bjørn, Jonas Christopher Villumsen, Tine C. Hansen Hancock, Toshimitsu Aritake, Shigeyuki Tani. 2017. Data tracking in search of workflows. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 2153--2165.
[46]
Naja Holten Møller. 2017. The Future of clerical work is precarious. ACM Interactions, 25(4), 75--77.
[47]
Gina Neff & Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. The MIT Press.
[48]
Gina Neff, Anissa Tanweer, Brittany Fiore-Gartland & Laura Osborn. 2017. Critique and contribute: A practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science. Big Data, 5(2), 85--97.
[49]
Office for National Statistics. 2019. The Probability of Automation in England.
[50]
Samir Passi & Solon Barocas. 2019. Problem Formulation and Fairness. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT).
[51]
Samir Passi & Steven J. Jackson. 2017. Data vision: Learning to see through algorithmic abstraction. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 2436--2447.
[52]
Caroline Criado Perez (2019). Invisible Women. Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Chatto & Windus, London.
[53]
Kathleen H. Pine & Max Liboiron (2015). The politics of measurement. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 3147--3156.
[54]
Dave Randall, Richard Harper & Mark Rouncefield. 2007. Fieldwork for Design. Theory and Practice. Springer.
[55]
Evelyn Rupert, Engin Isin & Didier Bigo. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society, 1--7. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. GROUP, Article 219, Publication date: July 2021. 20:20 Naja Holten Møller et al.
[56]
Andrew D. Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A. Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian & Janet Vertesi. 2019. Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT).
[57]
Lucy Suchman. 1995. Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56--64.
[58]
Hilda Tellioglu & Ina Wagner. 2001. Work practices surrounding PACS: The politics of space in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal (JCSCW) 10, 163--188.
[59]
Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James Colley & Ewa Luger. 2016. ?This has to be cats" -- personal data legibility in networked sensing systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), 491--502.
[60]
Satomi Tsuji, Kazuo Yano, Norihiko Moriwaki, Nobou Sato, Minoru Ogushi & Yoshihiro Wakisaka. 2009. Business microscope system. U.S. Patent Application No. 12/022, 630.
[61]
Tricia Wang. 2013. Big Data Needs Thick Data. Ethnography Matters. Posted 13. May 2013.
[62]
Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science. Sage Publications.
[63]
Karl E. Weick, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409--421.
[64]
Christine Wolf & Jeanette Blomberg. 2019. Evaluating the promise of human-algorithm collaborations in everyday work practices. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3 (CSCW), Article 143.
[65]
Daniela Wurhofer, Thomas Meneweger, Verena Fuchsberger & Manfred Tscheligi. 2018. Reflections on operators' and maintenance engineers' experiences of smart factories. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Supporting Groupwork, 284--296.
[66]
Kazuo Yano, Koji Ara, Norihiko Moriwaki & Hiroyuki Kuriyama. 2009. Measurement of Human Behavior: Creating a Society for Discovering Opportunities, Hitachi Review, 58(4), 139.
[67]
Shosana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)What Research through Art can bring to CSCW: exploring ambiguous futures of worki-com10.1515/icom-2023-003823:1(33-55)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Nurses Data Work as an Entry Point for Exploring how Bias is Considered in PracticeCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665129(62-66)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is ImpossibleACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861731:4(1-34)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? Collective Sensemaking for the Responsible Use of Sensor Data at Work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue GROUP
    GROUP
    July 2021
    190 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3475950
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 July 2021
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue GROUP

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data mining
    2. ethnography
    3. sensemaking with data
    4. sensor tracking
    5. worker contestability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Velux Foundations

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)218
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)What Research through Art can bring to CSCW: exploring ambiguous futures of worki-com10.1515/icom-2023-003823:1(33-55)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Nurses Data Work as an Entry Point for Exploring how Bias is Considered in PracticeCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665129(62-66)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is ImpossibleACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861731:4(1-34)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Amazon Z to A: Speculative Design to Understand the Future of Labor-Intensive WorkplacesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661561(314-327)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Contrasting Perspectives of Workers: Exploring Labor Relations in Workplace Automation and Potential InterventionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642907(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)DISCERN: Designing Decision Support Interfaces to Investigate the Complexities of Workplace Social Decision-Making With Line ManagersProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642685(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Migrant Farmworkers' Experiences of Agricultural Technologies: Implications for Worker Sociality and Desired ChangeProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642263(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Stochastic Machine Witnesses at Work: Today's Critiques of Taylorism are Inadequate for Workplace Surveillance Epistemologies of the FutureProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642206(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Reforming work patterns or negotiating workloads? Exploring alternative pathways for digital productivity assistants through a problematization lensJournal of Information Technology10.1177/0268396223118160239:3(503-520)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Powerful Futures: How a Big Tech Company Envisions Humans and Technologies in the Workplace of the FutureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101037:CSCW2(1-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media