skip to main content
10.1145/3465332.3470883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotstorageConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Isolating namespace and performance in key-value SSDs for multi-tenant environments

Published:27 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Key-value SSDs (KVSSDs) implement the storage engine of a key-value store such as log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) inside the SSD. However, recent LSM-tree based KVSSDs cannot be used directly in a multi-tenant environment. LSMtree-based KVSSDs are not designed with isolation in mind in terms of namespaces and performance, leading to incorrect data access between concurrent users and poor read performance. In this paper, we propose Iso-KVSSD, a LSM-tree based KVSSD for multi-tenancy by supporting namespace and performance isolation. The Iso-KVSSD performs access control based on the user's namespace and constructs per-namespace dedicated LSM-trees for users. We implement the Iso-KVSSD on Cosmos+ OpenSSD in a Linux environment and evaluate performance with Put() and Get() workloads by varying the number of tenants. Our extensive evaluation results showed that Iso-KVSSD has negligible write performance overhead and an average 2.9 times higher read throughput than a baseline that manages one global shared LSM tree between users.

References

  1. 2017. Cosmos+ OpenSSD Platform, http://www.openssd.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jinwoo Ahn, Junghee Lee, Yungwoo Ko, Donghyun Min, Jiyun Park, Sungyong Park, and Youngjae Kim. 2020. DISKSHIELD: A Data Tamper-Resistant Storage for Intel SGX. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS). ACM, 799--812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Janki Bhimani, Jingpei Yang, Ningfang Mi, Changho Choi, and Manoj Saha. 2021. Fine-grained Control of Concurrency within KV-SSDs. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM International System and Storage Conference (Systor). ACM, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. 2018. Samsung Smart SSD. https://samsungatfirst.com/smartssd-ocp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Storage Engines. 2020. MongoDB Manual. https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Facebook. 2017. LevelDB. https://github.com/google/leveldb.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Google. 2012. RocksDB: A Persistent Key-Value Store for Fast Storage Environment. https://rocksdb.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajay Gulati, Arif Merchant, and Peter J Varman. 2007. pClock: An Arrival Curve based Approach for QoS Guarantees in Shared Storage Systems. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 35, 1 (2007), 13--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. John L Hennessy and David A Patterson. 2011. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Junsu Im, Jinwook Bae, Chanwoo Chung, Arvind, and Sungjin Lee. 2020. PinK: High-speed In storage Key-value Store with Bounded Tails. In Proceeding of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC). USENIX, 173--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shvetank Jain, Fareha Shafique, Vladan Djeric, and Ashvin Goel. 2008. Application-level isolation and recovery with solitude. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems 2008. 95--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yanqin Jin, Hung-Wei Tseng, Yannis Papakonstantinou, and Steven Swanson. 2017. KAML: A Flexible, High-Performance Key-Value SSD. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). IEEE, 373--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Willis Lang, Srinath Shankar, Jignesh M Patel, and Ajay Kalhan. 2013. Towards multi-tenant performance SLOs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26, 6 (2013), 1447--1463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chang-Gyu Lee, Hyeongu Kang, Donggyu Park, Sungyong Park, Youngjae Kim, Jungki Noh, Woosuk Chung, and Kyoung Park. 2019. iLSM-SSD: An Intelligent LSM-Tree Based Key-Value SSD for Data Analytics. In Proceeding of the 27th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS). IEEE, 384--395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lanyue Lu, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Hariharan Gopalakrishnan, Andrea C Arpaci-Dusseau, and Remzi H ArpaciDusseau. 2016. Wisckey: Separating Keys from Values in SSDconscious Storage. In Proceedings of the File and Storage Technologies (FAST). USENIX, 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patrick O'Neil, Edward Cheng, Dieter Gawlick, and Elizabeth O'Neil. 1996. The Log-Structured Merge-Tree (LSM-tree). Acta Informatica 33, 4 (1996), 351--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sean Rhea, Brighten Godfrey, Brad Karp, John Kubiatowicz, Sylvia Ratnasamy, Scott Shenker, Ion Stoica, and Harlan Yu. 2005. OpenDHT: A Public DHT Service and Its Sses. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications. 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. David Shue, Michael J Freedman, and Anees Shaikh. 2012. Performance Isolation and Fairness for Multi-tenant Cloud Storage. In Proceeding of the 10th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). USENIX, 349--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sung-Ming Wu, Kai-Hsiang Lin, and Li-Pin Chang. 2018. KVSSD: Close Integration of LSM Trees and Flash Translation Layer for Writeefficient KV Store. In Proceeding of the Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). IEEE, 563--568.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lianying Zhao and Mohammad Mannan. 2019. TEE-aided Write Protection Against Privileged Data Tampering. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS). USENIX.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HotStorage '21: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems
    July 2021
    119 pages
    ISBN:9781450385503
    DOI:10.1145/3465332

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    HotStorage '21 Paper Acceptance Rate15of40submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate34of87submissions,39%

    Upcoming Conference

    HOTSTORAGE '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader