skip to main content
10.1145/3465481.3470034acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SecTULab: A Moodle-Integrated Secure Remote Access Architecture for Cyber Security Laboratories

Published:17 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 crisis has challenged cyber security teaching by creating the need for secure remote access to existing cyber security laboratory infrastructure. In this paper, we present requirements, architecture and key functionalities of a secure remote laboratory access solution that has been instantiated successfully for two existing laboratories at TU Wien. The proposed design prioritizes security and privacy aspects while integrating with existing Moodle eLearning platforms to leverage available authentication and group collaboration features. Performance evaluations of the prototype implementation for real cyber security classes support a first estimate of dimensioning and resources that must be provisioned when implementing the proposed secure remote laboratory access.

References

  1. Mhd Wael Bazzaza and Khaled Salah. 2015. Using the cloud to teach computer networks. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). IEEE, 310–314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Charles Border. 2007. The Development and Deployment of a Multi-User, Remote Access Virtualization System for Networking, Security, and System Administration Classes. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 1 (March 2007), 576–580. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227501Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Young B. Choi, Shinyoung Lim, and Tae H. Oh. 2010. Feasibility of Virtual Security Laboratory for Three-Tiered Distance Education. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Information Technology Education (Midland, Michigan, USA) (SIGITE ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1867651.1867666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Te-Shun Chou and John Jones. 2018. Developing and Evaluating an Experimental Learning Environment for Cyber Security Education. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (SIGITE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241815.3241855Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jeremy Diederich, Xianping Wang, Niharika Dayyala, Sundeep Inti, and Ying Luo. 2020. USB Linux: An IT Lab Instruction Tool During COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGITE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368308.3415372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ji Hu, Christoph Meinel, and Michael Schmitt. 2004. Tele-Lab IT Security: An Architecture for Interactive Lessons for Security Education. SIGCSE Bull. 36, 1 (March 2004), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Steven Rigby and Melissa Dark. 2006. Designing a Flexible, Multipurpose Remote Lab for the IT Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Information Technology Education (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (SIGITE ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/1168812.1168843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Khaled Salah, Mohammad Hammoud, and Sherali Zeadally. 2015. Teaching cybersecurity using the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 8, 4 (2015), 383–392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dino Schweitzer and Jeff Boleng. 2009. Designing web labs for teaching security concepts. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 25, 2 (2009), 39–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Johannes Sianipar, Christian Willems, and C. Meinel. 2016. A Container-Based Virtual Laboratory for Internet Security e-Learning. The international journal of learning(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Johannes Sianipar, Christian Willems, and Christoph Meinel. 2017. Team Placement in Crowd-Resourcing Virtual Laboratory for IT Security e-Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing (London, United Kingdom) (ICCBDC 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141128.3141146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Muhammad Wannous and Hiroshi Nakano. 2010. NVLab, a Networking Virtual Web-Based Laboratory that Implements Virtualization and Virtual Network Computing Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 3, 2 (2010), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ARES '21: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
    August 2021
    1447 pages
    ISBN:9781450390514
    DOI:10.1145/3465481

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate228of451submissions,51%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format