skip to main content
10.1145/3466029.3466040acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond Traditional Piggery to Automation Farm System Based on Internet of Things

Published:27 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The pig is one of the economic animals in Thailand. Pork exporting to many countries is significantly higher than the previous year. While Covid-19 disease has arisen severe health problems to cause illness and death in humans worldwide, pork demands in most geographical do not reduce. However, farmers have toughly managed their farms according to fewer local and foreign laborers and social distancing strategy. Recently, IoT technology has been introduced and has been influenced to speedily design and development, helping to sense, monitor, control, and manage tasks automatically. This paper has proposed the design and establishes the automation piggery system to monitor and manage the daily farmer tasks. The automation piggery system has been experienced on the physical piggery for a week. The primary evaluation of the automatic piggery system was investigated to study the functional testing. The system can automatically achieve the basis of daily work schedules of farmers on a traditional piggery. The system monitors times in different periods to check a food quantity and temperature controls for giving water and turning on fans. The software testing includes a precision timing module, data display, and accuracy of IoT particle sensors. However, this research is before being additional needs to research more before the actual deployment can be in a piggery.

References

  1. Ilaria Zonda, Mick Jongeling, Dan Xu, and Gijs Huisman. 2019. Growkit: Using technology to support people growing food at home. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19). ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312834Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Meennapa Rukhiran and Paniti Netinant. 2020. Mobile Application development of hydroponic smart farm using information flow diagram. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT’20), IEEE, Chonburi, Thailand, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1109/InCIT50588.2020.9310780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Keith Kirkpatrick. 2019. Technologizing agriculture. Commun. ACM. 62, 2 (January 2019), 14-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3297805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA Office of Global Analysis. 2018. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. Retrieved January 10, 2021 from https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/73666448x/jm214p55j/8049g558s/livestock-poultry-ma-04-10-2018.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sera Whitelaw, Mamas A. Mamas, Eric Topol, and Harriette G. V. Spall. 2020. Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. Lancet Digit. Health. 2, 8, (June 2009), 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30142-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Feed Strategy. 2018. Growing pork demand, efficiency gains fuel pig production. Retrieved January 10, 2021 from https://www.feedstrategy.com/swine/growing-pork-demand-efficiency-gains-fuel-pig-productionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Meennapa Rukhiran and Paniti Netinant. 2020. IoT architecture based on information flow diagram for vermiculture smart farming kit. TEM J. 9, 4 (November 2020), 1330-1337. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-03Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Atefe Zakeri, Omar Khadeer Hussain, Morteza Saberi, Saeed Aboutalebi, and Elizabeth Chang. 2019. Smart Farm: A system for proactive management of raw milk quality. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Data Mining (WIDM’19). ACM, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304079.3310285Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Alejandro Belanche, Ignacio Martín-García, Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Javier Pleguezuelos, Ángel R. Mantecón, and David R. Yáñez-Ruiz. 2019. Optimizing management of dairy goat farms through individual animal data interpretation: A case study of smart farming in Spain. Agric. Syst. 173, (February 2019), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Reobert Hoste, Hyun Suh, and Harry Kortee. 2017. Smart farming in pig production and greenhouse horiculture. Wageningen University & Research Report, Wageningen University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Amelie Bonde, Akkarit Sangpetch, Shijia Pan, Woranun Woramontri, Pei Zhang, Orathai Sangpetch, and Hae Young Noh. 2018. Structural vibration sensing to evaluate animal activity on a piggery. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Data Acquisition To Analysis (DATA’18), ACM, Shenzhen, China, 25-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277868.3277881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Admela Jukan, Xavi Masip-Bruin, and Nina Amla. 2017. Smart computing and sensing technologies for animal welfare: A systematic review. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1 (April 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3041960Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Francisco Carpio, Admela Jukan, Ana Isabel Martín Sanchez, Nina Amla, and Nicole Kemper. 2017. Beyond Production Indicators. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI’17). ACM, Milton Keynes, UK, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152130.3152140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cor N. Verdouw, Sjaak Wolfert, and Bedir Tekinerdogan. 2016. Internet of Things in Agriculture. CAB Rev. 11, 035 (December 2016), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201611035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Carlos Piñeiro, Joaquín Morales, María Rodríguez, María Aparicio, Edgar García Manzanilla, and Yuzo Koketsu. 2019. Big (pig) data and the internet of the swine things: a new paradigm in the industry. Anim. Front. 9, 2 (April 2019), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEEG '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government
    April 2021
    165 pages
    ISBN:9781450389495
    DOI:10.1145/3466029

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format