skip to main content
10.1145/3466725.3466758acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfablearnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Frustration as an Opportunity for Learning: Review of Literature

Published: 27 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Frustration has been often observed during makerspace activities; however, only a few research studies have examined its importance during the maker process. In this literature review, we examine empirical studies where frustration has been observed in makerspaces, specifically looking at the potential of frustration to motivate learning opportunities in these spaces. We identify circumstances that lead learners to experience frustration and ways in which frustration can be used to achieve better learning outcomes in makerspaces. Based on the literature, we propose recommendations for educators and researchers on how frustration can be reoriented and used as positive reinforcement to help learners complete their activities in makerspaces.

References

[1]
Abram Amsel. 1958. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological bulletin 55, 2 (1958), 102.
[2]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1960. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity.
[3]
Bronwyn Bevan, Joshua P Gutwill, Mike Petrich, and Karen Wilkinson. 2015. Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education 99, 1 (2015), 98–120.
[4]
Paulo Blikstein. 2008. Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an agent of emancipation. In Social Justice Education for Teachers. Brill Sense, 205–235.
[5]
Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and ‘making'in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors 4, 1 (2013), 1–21.
[6]
Paulo Blikstein, Zaza Kabayadondo, Andrew Martin, and Deborah Fields. 2017. An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs: Assessment of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs. J. Eng. Educ. 106, 1 (January 2017), 149–175.
[7]
Paulo Blikstein and Marcelo Worsley. 2016. Children Are Not Hackers. In Makeology (1st ed.), Kylie Peppler, Erica Rosenfeld Halverson and Yasmin B. Kafai (eds.). Routledge, New York: Routledge, 2016., 64–79.
[8]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[9]
Steuart Britt and Sidney Janus. 1940. Criteria of frustration. Psychological Review 47, 5 (1940), 451–470.
[10]
Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan, and Day Greenberg. 2016. The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record 119, 6 (2016), 11–44.
[11]
Pao-Nan Chou. 2018. Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics. EURASIA J MATH SCI T 14, 10 (July 2018).
[12]
Sharon Lynn Chu, Francis Quek, Sourabh Bhangaonkar, Amy Boettcher Ging, and Kumar Sridharamurthy. 2015. Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, (2015), 11–19.
[13]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Kim Hermanson. 1995. What makes visitors want to learn? Intrinsic motivation in museums. Museum News 74, 3 (1995), 34–37.
[14]
Deborah A. Fields, Debora Lui, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2019. Teaching Computational Thinking with Electronic Textiles: Modeling Iterative Practices and Supporting Personal Projects in Exploring Computer Science. In Computational Thinking Education, Siu-Cheung Kong and Harold Abelson (eds.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 279–294.
[15]
Kiel M Gilleade and Alan Dix. 2004. Using frustration in the design of adaptive videogames. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology - ACE ’04, ACM Press, Singapore, 228–232.
[16]
Arthur C. Graesser and Sidney D'Mello. 2012. Emotions During the Learning of Difficult Material. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Elsevier, 183–225.
[17]
Idit Ed Harel and Seymour Ed Papert. 1991. Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.
[18]
Jason R. Harron and Joan E. Hughes. 2018. Spacemakers: A Leadership Perspective on Curriculum and the Purpose of K–12 Educational Makerspaces. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 50, 3 (July 2018), 253–270.
[19]
Anu Kajamaa and Kristiina Kumpulainen. 2019. Agency in the making: Analyzing students’ transformative agency in a school-based makerspace. Mind, Culture, and Activity 26, 3 (July 2019), 266–281.
[20]
Kristiina Kumpulainen and Anu Kajamaa. 2020. Sociomaterial movements of students’ engagement in a school's makerspace. Br J Educ Technol 51, 4 (July 2020), 1292–1307.
[21]
Adam V. Maltese, Amber Simpson, and Alice Anderson. 2018. Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity 30, (December 2018), 116–124.
[22]
Seymour Papert. 2002. Hard fun. Bangor Daily News 2, (2002). Retrieved from http://www.papert.org/articles/HardFun.html
[23]
Kimberly Sheridan, Erica Rosenfeld Halverson, Breanne Litts, Lisa Brahms, Lynette Jacobs-Priebe, and Trevor Owens. 2014. Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review 84, 4 (December 2014), 505–531.
[24]
Richard J. Stiggins. 2002. Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning. Phi Delta Kappan 83, 10 (June 2002), 758–765.
[25]
Vanessa W. Vongkulluksn, Ananya M. Matewos, Gale M. Sinatra, and Julie A. Marsh. 2018. Motivational factors in makerspaces: a mixed methods study of elementary school students’ situational interest, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. IJ STEM Ed 5, 1 (December 2018), 43.
[26]
Paul T. Wong. 1979. Frustration, exploration, and learning. Canadian Psychological Review/Psychologie canadienne 20, 3 (1979), 133–144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)The Confrustion Constellation: A New Way of Looking at Confusion and FrustrationCognitive Science10.1111/cogs.7003549:1Online publication date: 21-Jan-2025
  1. Frustration as an Opportunity for Learning: Review of Literature

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021: FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021 - An International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education
    June 2021
    148 pages
    ISBN:9781450389891
    DOI:10.1145/3466725
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Makerspaces
    2. frustration
    3. learning opportunities
    4. motivation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 35 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)The Confrustion Constellation: A New Way of Looking at Confusion and FrustrationCognitive Science10.1111/cogs.7003549:1Online publication date: 21-Jan-2025

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media