skip to main content
10.1145/3466933.3466940acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model for Projects Observatories: A Preliminary Study

Published: 08 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In the organizations and projects, the observation has been defined by the transparency construct in the recent literature. The development of tools to systematize transparency has presented as a challenge to organizations. In this sense, the observatories are presented as information systems that support the collection, organization, storage, analysis, and observation publications, providing transparency. Nowadays, it is possible to identify the existence of observatories related to the most variable themes, such as health, environment, social media, cities, web, among others. In addition to that, projects and their management may also benefit from the development of these observatories. The use of observatories in the most different areas of knowledge added a striking feature, typological diversity. There is not only one model of observatories; however, the diversity does not prevent from establishing guidelines that can guide these observatories. Before this scenario, this research aims to propose a model that contributes to the comprehension and the development of projects observatories. We developed a set of initial exploratory studies to achieve this research’s objective where ten projects were executed ten pilot projects of project observatories. In addition, we developed a systematic mapping of the literature on observatories. The initial exploratory studies and the systematic mapping of the literature gave rise to the preliminary version of the model for project observatories.

References

[1]
Luís A. Albornoz and Micael Herschmann. 2006. Os observatórios ibero-americanos de informação, comunicação e cultura: balanço de uma breve trajetória. Revista da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação (E-Compós) 7 (2006), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.v7i0.102
[2]
Renata Araujo. 2017. Information Systems and the Open World Challenges. In GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016 - 2026. Brazilian Computer Society (SBC), Chapter 4, 42–51.
[3]
Alessandra Duarte Batista, Roberto C. S. Pacheco, Kedma B. Duarte, Denilson Sell, and Marcelo André Marchezan. 2016. Observatórios de Competência. In VI Congresso Internacional de Conhecimento e Inovação (ciKi). Bogotá.
[4]
Alessandra Duarte Batista, Denilson Sell, Maria Angélica Jung Marques, and Roberto Pacheco. 2018. Aplicação De Observatório De Conhecimento No Desenvolvimento De Redes De Coprodução. In VII Congreso International de Conocimiento e Innovación (CiKi). Guadalajara.
[5]
Ethan S. Bernstein. 2017. Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Academy of Management Annals 11, 1 (2017), 217–266.
[6]
Jan Betta and Liudmila Boronina. 2018. Transparency in Project Management – from Traditional to Agile. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 56, Febm(2018), 446–449. https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-18.2018.103
[7]
Ian C. Brown. 2017. The DNA of Web Observatories. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southampton. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.04.020
[8]
Ian C. Brown, Wendy Hall, and Lisa Harris. 2014. Towards a taxonomy for web observatories. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. Seoul, Korea, 1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2579212
[9]
Claudia Cappelli. 2009. Uma Abordagem para Transparência em Processos Organizacionais Utilizando Aspectos. Ph.D. Dissertation. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
[10]
Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and James Herbsleb. 2013. Leveraging transparency. IEEE Software 30, 1 (2013), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2012.172
[11]
Leonhard Dobusch and Maximilian Heimstädt. 2017. Politics of Disclosure: Organizational Transparency as Multiactor Negotiation. Public Administration Review(2017), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12895.Politics
[12]
Steve Easterbrook, Janice Singer, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Daniela Damian. 2008. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer London, London, 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11
[13]
Murilo S. Gomes, Talita Rossari, Gabriel Ecker, Lidiane Visintin, and Antonio Pereira Candido. 2016. Uma ontologia de domínio no contexto de observatórios. In IX ONTOBRAS Seminário de Pesquisa em Ontologias do Brasil, Vol. 1862. Curitiba, PR, 203–208.
[14]
Maximilian Heimstädt. 2017. Openwashing: A decoupling perspective on organizational transparency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 125 (2017), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037
[15]
Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Amber Spackman Jones, David K. Stevens, David G. Tarboton, and Nancy O. Mesner. 2010. A sensor network for high frequency estimation of water quality constituent fluxes using surrogates. Environmental Modelling and Software 25, 9 (2010), 1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.012
[16]
Célio I. C. Rodrigues, Raffael C. Rodrigues, Nathalia Freitas de Menezes, and Igor Oliveira Vasconcelos. 2019. A Tecnologia da Informação como Viabilizadora da Divulgação Transparente e Eficaz de Dados Públicos. (2019), 124–125. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2019.7450
[17]
Ricardo Villasís Keever, Zuridahi Rubio Rojo, and Ana María Delgadillo Silva. 2017. Una década de observatorios urbanos: los nuevos retos. UVserva4(2017), 51–57.
[18]
Barbara Ann Kitchenham, David Budgen, and Pearl Brereton. 2016. Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. CRC Press, New York. 426 pages.
[19]
Mircea Lungu and Michele Lanza. 2010. The small project observatory - A tool for reverse engineering software ecosystems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol. 2. 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/1810295.1810356
[20]
Lirian Maria Meneghel and Edegar Luis Tomazzoni. 2012. A comunicação e a integração dos atores do turismo regional: o caso do observatório de turismo e cultura da serra gaúcha (OBSERVATUR). Revista Turismo Visão e Ação 14, 2(2012), 246 –260.
[21]
Vanessa T. Nunes, Claudia Cappelli, and Célia G. Ralha. 2017. Transparency in Information Systems. In I GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016 - 2026, Brazilian Computer Society (SBC)(Ed.). Chapter 7, 73–89.
[22]
Cristina Ortega and Roberto San Salvador del Valle. 2010. Nuevos retos de los observatorios culturales. Boletín GC: Gestión Cultural19 (2010), 1–15.
[23]
Viviane Masseran Antunes Parreiras and Adelaide Maria de Souza Antunes. 2013. Aplicação de Foresight e Inteligência Competitiva em um Centro de P&D Empresarial por meio de um Observatório de Tendências: desafios e benefícios. Revista Gestão & Conexões 1, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13071/regec.2317-5087.2012.1.1.3908.55-73
[24]
Thiago Duarte Pimentel. 2018. El Observatorio Económico y Social de Turismo. Revista Latino Americana de Turismologia (RELAT) 4, 1 (2018), 66–84.
[25]
PMI. 2018. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6ª editioned.). Project Management Institute (PMI). 756 pages.
[26]
Luis C. Rodríguez, Yessica L. Bonilla, and Gonzalo Ortiz. 2018. Observatorio de prácticas comunicativas: un escenario para la construcción colectiva. Comunicación 37, 37 (2018), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.18566/comunica.n37.a08
[27]
Marici Cristine Gramacho Sakata, Armando Malheiro da Silva, Edson Luiz Riccio, and Maria Ligia Capobianco. 2013. Construção do Observatório USP CONTECSI : Análise da dinâmica científica e impacto nacional e internacional de um congresso acadêmico. Prisma.com 20(2013), 1–41.
[28]
Nádia Solange Schmidt and Christian Luiz Silva. 2018. Observatório como instrumento de prospectiva estratégica para as Instituições de Ciência e Tecnologia (ICTs). Interações (Campo Grande) 19, 2 (2018), 153. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v19i2.1689
[29]
Antonio Leopoldino da Silva, Marinilse Netto, Esperidião Amin Helou Filho, and Paulo Maurício Selig. 2013. Observatórios de informação e conhecimento: discutindo bases conceituais e perspectivas de efetividade. In IX Congreso Nacional de Excelencia em gestão. Rio de Janeiro, 22.
[30]
Antonio Waldimir Leopoldino da Silva. 2014. Governança de Sistemas de Indicadores de Sustentabilidade em Processos de Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica sob Mediação da Gestão do Conhecimento. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
[31]
Louise Spiteri. 1998. A simplified model for facet analysis: Ranganathan 101. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 23, 1-2 (1998).
[32]
Ramine Tinati, Xin Wang, Thanassis Tiropanis, and Wendy Hall. 2015. Building a Real-Time Web Observatory. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 6 (2015), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2015.94
[33]
Celio Trois, Daniel Weingaertner, Diego Pasqualin, Edemir Maciel, Eduardo Almeida, Fabiano Silva, Hegler Tissot, Luis C.E. Bona, Marcos Castilho, Marcos Didonet, and Marcos Sunye. 2017. Transparency meets management: A monitoring and evaluating tool for governmental projects. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA. 1429–1435. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2017.17
[34]
D. Trzeciak. 2009. Modelo de observatório para arranjos produtivos locais. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC.
[35]
Max Van Kleek, Daniel Alexander Smith, Ramine Tinati, Kieron O’Hara, Wendy Hall, and Nigel R. Shadbolt. 2014. 7 Billion Home Telescopes: Observing Social Machines through Personal Data Stores. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. 915–920. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2578840
[36]
Jeferson K. M. Vieira, Jessyca L. P. Barbosa, Ivaldir H. Farias Junior, and Hermano P. Moura. 2020. Universal Observatory of Projects: Initial Studies. In 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Sevilla, Spain, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti49556.2020.9141001
[37]
Jeferson K M Vieira, Jessyca L P Barbosa, Ivaldir H De Farias Junior, and Hermano P De Moura. 2020. Observatories: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature. International Journal of Development Research 10, 9 (2020), 39869–39876.
[38]
Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268
[39]
Claes Wohlin and Aybüke Aurum. 2015. Towards a decision-making structure for selecting a research design in empirical software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 20, 6 (12 2015), 1427–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-014-9319-7
[40]
Vinicius Tohoru Yoshiura, Diego Bettiol Yamada, Felipe Carvalho Pellison, Inácia Bezerra De Lima, Ieda Pelogia Martins Damian, Rui Pedro Charters Lopes Rijo, João Mazzoncini De Azevedo Marques, and Domingos Alves. 2018. Towards a health observatory conceptual model based on the semantic web. Procedia Computer Science 138 (2018), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.019

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Model for Projects Observatories: A Preliminary Study
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SBSI '21: Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
        June 2021
        453 pages
        ISBN:9781450384919
        DOI:10.1145/3466933
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 08 July 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. observation
        2. observatories
        3. projects
        4. projects observatories
        5. transparency

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        SBSI '21

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 181 of 557 submissions, 32%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 56
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media