skip to main content
10.1145/3466933.3466963acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Work Like Ants! Atta 2.0: Dealing with Self-Organized Teams

Published:08 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional software engineering approaches were developed based on the old manufacturing process, in terms of roles, responsibilities, tasks, and hierarchy. Modern approaches, such as, Agile approaches, are based on a fusion of these traditional approaches and the Agile Manifesto, which changes the perspective of main software process objectives. These approaches are designed to encourage self-management, which may be challenging even in big or very small software companies. This paper proposes a software engineering complementary framework called Atta 2.0 (Atta 2), which is an approach inspired by a nature organization and aims to deal with the difficulties of self-organization issues. We performed a case study on a start-up company, that follows Scrum guidelines, has a very small team, and maintains several projects at the same time. As the outcome, we have success running the Atta 2 and obtained gains in terms of self-organization, structure, and visibility. Based on this we advocate that Atta 2 improved Sprint planning and execution, tasks creation and distribution, and slightly the quality of delivered artifacts. We also focus that Atta 2 helped to integrate new team members and to extract the best from the new ones and old team members. We advocate that Atta 2, may have value to the community, once it is a complementary option to aggregates value to well-known agile or traditional approaches. Thus, we concluded that Atta 2 can be used jointly with other management approaches, in order to promote the best-aggregated value.

References

  1. Alain Abran, James W Moore, Pierre Bourque, Robert Dupuis, and Leonard L Tripp. 2004. Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge: 2004 version SWEBOK. IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie Van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, 2001. The agile manifesto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniela S Cruzes, Tore Dyba, Per Runeson, and Martin Host. 2011. Case studies synthesis: Brief experience and challenges for the future. In 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE, 343–346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. JM de Abreu and JHC Delabie. 1986. Controle das formigas cortadeiras em plantios de cacau. Revista Theobroma 16(1986), 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Miguel Ecar, Fabio Kepler, and João Pablo S da Silva. 2018. Cosmic User Story Standard. In International Conference on Agile Software Development. Springer, 3–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. José V Hernández and K Jaffé. 1995. Dano econômico causado por populações de formigas Atta laevigata (F. Smith) em plantações de Pinus caribaea Mor. e elementos para o manejo da praga. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 24, 2 (1995), 287–298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harri Kaikkonen, Harri Haapasalo, and Kai Hänninen. 2018. Characteristics of self-managing teams in rapid product development projects. International Journal of Value Chain Management 9, 1 (2018), 1–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes.Archives of psychology(1932).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Alci E LOECK, Douglas Grützmacher, and Gustavo Storch. 2001. Distribuição geográfica de Atta sexdens piriventris Santschi, 1919, nas principais regiões agropecuárias do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Current Agricultural Science and Technology 7, 1 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Per Runeson and Martin Höst. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical software engineering 14, 2 (2009), 131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ian Sommerville. 2010. Software Engineering(9th ed.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Viktoria Stray, Nils Brede Moe, and Rashina Hoda. 2018. Autonomous agile teams: Challenges and future directions for research. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Agile Software Development: Companion. ACM, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Edward O Wilson. 1980. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 7, 2 (1980), 143–156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Marting Höst, Magnus C. Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 249 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. RONALD ZANETTI, GERALDO ANDRADE Carvalho, A Santos, ALAN Souza-Silva, and MAURÍCIO SEKIGUCHI Godoy. 2002. Manejo integrado de formigas cortadeiras. Lavras: UFLA (2002), 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Work Like Ants! Atta 2.0: Dealing with Self-Organized Teams
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SBSI '21: Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
            June 2021
            453 pages
            ISBN:9781450384919
            DOI:10.1145/3466933

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 July 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format