skip to main content
10.1145/3467707.3467723acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Non-invasive Grading System for Banana Tiers using RGB Imaging and Deep Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Food losses transpire at postharvest and processing operations in developing countries, commonly caused by inaccurate manual classification of horticultural crops. The modernization of agricultural facilities and emerging technologies in agriculture has provided solutions for such losses and even increased productivity in a short duration and with higher precision. A non-invasive classification of bananas is presented in this paper, which grades banana tiers into different categories using digital images of bananas applied with deep learning techniques. The main objective of this paper is to develop a tier-based grading system for clustered fruits such as bananas and classify them in terms of quality (export class, middle class, and reject class), maturity (green, turning yellow, yellow, and overripe), and size (small, medium, and large). The classification models for the different grading parameters are developed using transfer learning and a fine-tuned VGG16 Deep CNN architecture. The system was able to automate the assembly line-like process of classifying bananas with a satisfactory overall accuracy using only a minimal number of image samples. The non-invasive technique will also serve as a paradigm for classifying other clustered fruits or horticultural crops.

References

  1. Lotis E. Mopera. 2016. Food Loss in the Food Value Chain: The Philippine Agriculture Scenario. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture. p. 8-16. https://doi.org/10.11178/jdsa.11.8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhiguo Li and Colin Thomas. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of mechanical damage to fresh fruit. Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.12.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Perlita Aquino-Nuevo and Arnel Ramir Apaga. 2011. Technology Reducing Postharvest Losses and Maintaining Quality of Fruits and Vegetables (Philippines). 2011 AARDO Workshop on Technology 154-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tuan-Tang Le, Chyi-Yeu Lin, and Eduardo Jr Piedad.2019. Deep learning for noninvasive classification of clustered horticultural crops – A case for banana fruit tiers. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 156. 110922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.05.023Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Muhamad Farid Mavi, Zulkifli Husin, R. Badlishah Ahmad, Yasmin Mohd Yacob, Rohani Farook, Wei Keong Tan. 2019. Mango ripeness classification system using hybrid technique. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vol 14, No.2. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v14.i2.pp859-868Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Panmanas Sirisomboon, Suwanee Boonmung, Pimpen Pornchaloempong, and Manat Pithuncharurnlap. 2008. A Preliminary Study on Classification of Mango Maturity by Compression Test. International Journal of Food Properties. Vol. 11, Issue 1, Pages 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910701435430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yang Yu, Sergio A. Velastin, and Fei Yin. 2020. Automatic grading of apples based on multi-features and weighted K-means clustering algorithm. Information Processing in Agriculture, Volume 7, Issue 4, 2020, Pages 556-565, ISSN 2214-3173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.11.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Payman Moallem, Alireza Serajoddin, and Hossein Pourghassem. 2017. Computer vision-based apple grading for golden delicious apples based on surface features. Information Processing in Agriculture, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 33-40, ISSN 2214-3173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.10.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Santi Kumari Behera, Amiya Kumar Rath, and Prabira Kumar Sethy, 2020. Maturity status classification of papaya fruits based on machine learning and transfer learning approach, Information Processing in Agriculture, ISSN 2214-3173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.05.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Luiz Fernando Santos Pereira, Sylvio Barbon Jr., Nektarios A. Valous, and Douglas Fernandes Barbin. 2018. Predicting the ripening of papaya fruit with digital imaging and random forests. Comput. Electron. Agric. 145 (January), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xiangyu Zeng, Yu Miao, Saima Ubaid, Xiumin Gao, and Songlin Zhuang. 2020. Detection and classification of bruises of pears based on thermal images, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Volume 161, 2020, 111090, ISSN 0925-5214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.111090Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Florentino Bexiga, Daniela Rodrigues, Rui Guerra, António Brázioa, Tiago Balegas, Ana M. Cavaco, Maria Dulce Antunesa, José Valente de Oliveira. .2017. A TSS classification study of ‘Rocha’ pear (Pyrus communis L.) based on non-invasive visible/near infra-red reflectance spectra, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Volume 132, Pages 23-30, ISSN 0925-5214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.05.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nandan Thor. 2017. Applying machine learning clustering and classification to predict banana ripeness states and shelf life. Cloud Publ. Int. J. Adv. Food Sci. Technol. 2 (1), 20–25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasnida Saad, Ahmad Puad Ismail, Noriza Othman, Mohamad Huzaimy Jusoh, Nani Fadzlina Naim, and Nur Azam Ahmad. 2009. Recognizing the ripeness of bananas using artificial neural network based on histogram approach.2009 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIPA.2009.5478715Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Izzat Hafiz Hadfi and Zeratul Izzah Mohd Yusoh. 2018. Banana Ripeness Detection and Servings Recommendation System using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering. Vol 10, No 2-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Surya Prabha and J. Satheesh Kumar. 2015. Assessment of banana fruit maturity by image processing technique. J Food Sci Technol, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1188-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nur Badariah Ahmad Mustafa, Nurashikin Ahmad Fuad, Syed Khaleel Ahmed, Aidil Azwin Zainul Abidin, Zaipatimah Ali, Wong Bing Yit, and Zainul Abidin Md Sharrif. 2008. Image processing of an agriculture produce: Determination of size and ripeness of a banana. In International Symposium on Information Technology, ITSim 2008. (Vol. 1, pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631636Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Eduardo Jr Piedad, Julaiza I. Larada, Glydel J. Pojasc, and Laura Vithalie V. Ferrer. 2018. Postharvest classification of banana (Musa acuminata) using tier-based machine learning, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Volume 145,2018, Pages 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.06.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rosanna C. Ucat and Jennifer C. Dela Cruz. 2019. Postharvest Grading Classification of Cavendish Banana Using Deep Learning and Tensorflow. International Symposium on Multimedia and Communication Technology (ISMAC) 2019, Quezon City, Philippines, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/ICIT.2018.8352510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Naoshi Kondo. 2010. Automation on fruit and vegetable grading system and food traceability. Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 145–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2009.09.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Armacheska R. Mesa and John Y. Chiang. 2021. Banana Project Dataset, Mendeley Data, V1, http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/k4bf4n537s.1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. UNECE Codex Standard for Bananas. 2005. CODEX STAN 205-1997, AMD. 1-2005, Available online: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/agr/meetings/ge.01/document/Codex%20bananas%20E.pdf. (accessed on 1 November 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCAI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence
    April 2021
    498 pages
    ISBN:9781450389501
    DOI:10.1145/3467707

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format