skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468303acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Operational Service Strategy for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from the Airline Industry

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study explores the key determinants of the impact of product line strategy on airline industry services performance during the COVID-19 epidemic. The study extracted airline data from several online sources. The results suggested that the airlines used a product and service differentiation strategy to gain some market shares under the circumstance. In addition, using data from traveler reviews, text analysis techniques provide insightful information about service characteristics that differentiate positive and negative reviews. Results suggest that satisfied travelers seek sympathetic and responsiveness, while negative reviews suggest complaints of poor operational activities such as IT operations and flight cancellations.

References

  1. Deshpande, M. and Sarkar, A. (2010). BI and sentiment analysis. Business Intelligence Journal, 15(2), pp.41-49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kristensen, K. and Eskildsen, J. (2011) , June. The validity of the Net Promoter Score as a business performance measure. In Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (ICQR2MSE), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 970-974). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leisen Pollack, B. and Alexandrov, A. (2013). Nomological validity of the Net Promoter Index question. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2), pp.118-129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Atalık, Ö., Bakır, M., & Akan, Ş. (2019). The Role of In-Flight Service Quality on Value for Money in Business Class: A Logit Model on the Airline Industry. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hu, H. Y. (2018, June). Research on Customer Churn Prediction Using Logistic Regression Model. In International Conference on Intelligent and Interactive Systems and Applications (pp. 344-350). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellizzi, M. G., Eboli, L., Forciniti, C., & Mazzulla, G. (2018). Air transport passengers’ satisfaction: an ordered logit model. Transportation Research Procedia, 33, 147-154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bhat, V. N. (1995). A multivariate analysis of airline flight delays. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lapré, M. A., & Scudder, G. D. (2004). Performance improvement paths in the US airline industry: linking trade‐offs to asset frontiers. Production and Operations Management, 13(2), 123-134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jiang, Hongwei, and Yahua Zhang. "An investigation of service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty in China's airline market." Journal of air transport management 57 (2016): 80-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hapsari, R., Clemes, M. D., & Dean, D. (2017). The impact of service quality, customer engagement and selected marketing constructs on airline passenger loyalty. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Brochado, A., Rita, P., Oliveira, C., & Oliveira, F. (2019). Airline passengers’ perceptions of service quality: themes in online reviews. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsafarakis, S., Kokotas, T., & Pantouvakis, A. (2018). A multiple criteria approach for airline passenger satisfaction measurement and service quality improvement. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 61-75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R. and Zeithaml, V.A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of marketing research, 30(1), p.7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Reichheld, F.F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard business review, 81(12), pp.46-55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mussa, M. & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301-317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Moorthy, K. S. (1988). Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Science, 7(2), 141-169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Iyer, G. & Seetharaman, P.B. (2008). Too close to be similar: Product and price competition in retail gasoline markets. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(3), 205-234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Banker, R.D., Potter, G. & Schroeder, R.G. (1995). An empirical analysis of manufacturing overhead cost drivers, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 115-137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ramdas, K., & Sawhney, M. S. (2001). A cross-functional approach to evaluating multiple line extensions for assembled products. Management Science, 47(1), 22-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Netessine, S., & Taylor, T. A. (2007). Product line design and production technology. Marketing Science, 26(1), 101-117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Maxwell, W. L. (1964). The scheduling of economic lot sizes. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 11(2), 89-124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Zipkin, P. H. (1991). Computing optimal lot sizes in the economic lot scheduling problem. Operations Research, 39(1), 56-63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yang, J., Yan, H., & Taksar, M. I. (2000). Optimal production and setup scheduling: A one-machine, two-product system. Annals of Operations research, 98(1), 291-311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Vidal-Carreras, P. I., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., & Coronado-Hernandez, J. R. (2012). Economic lot scheduling with deliberated and controlled coproduction. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 396-404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format