skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468304acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identification of E-Maintenance Dominant Factor that Affect Maintenance Performance of High Rise Buildings

Published: 27 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In order to improve maintenance performance, several buildings have been implemented e-maintenance system. E-maintenance system itself is a combination of two elements of building maintenance, there are (a) management maintenance consisting of policy, guidelines, and Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), and (b) technology maintenance consisting of information system and Building Information Modeling (BIM). However, during its operational period, currently the implementation of e-maintenance system for high-rise building is considered not to be carried out effectively. In order to adress this concern, it is necessary to find out the factors of e-maintenance system of high rise building that affect the results of maintenance. This study proposes identification of e-maintenance system factors that affect maintenance performance of high-rise building and find out the dominant factor. This study combines the optimization factors of each of the e-maintenance components. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis which produces 26 factors which then tabulated and categorized to determine the dominant factors. The research resulted in five factor categories of e-maintenance system for high rise buildings that affect its maintenance performance, those are risk factor, operational factor, resources factor, corporate culture factor, and technology factor. The result of this study is suggested that the dominant factors of e-maintenance system for high rise buildings that affect the performance of its maintenance is risk factor.

References

[1]
T. Han and B. S. Yang, “Development of an e-maintenance system integrating advanced techniques,” Comput. Ind., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 569–580, 2006.
[2]
L. Yan, C. Lu, and N. Y. C. Andrew, “An agent-based platform for web-enabled equipment predictive maintenance,” Proc. - 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. Intell. Agent Technol. IAT’05, vol. 2005, pp. 132–135, 2005.
[3]
A. Shah Ali, “Cost decision making in building maintenance practice in Malaysia,” J. Facil. Manag., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 298–306, 2009.
[4]
N. I. Wardahni, L. S. Riantini, Y. Latief, and R. A. Machfudiyanto, “Identification of e-maintenance elements and indicators that affect maintenance performance of high rise building: A literature review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1007, no. 1, 2020.
[5]
I. M. Shohet, “Key performance indicators for maintenance of health-care facilities,” Facilities, vol. 21, no. August, pp. 5–12, 2003.
[6]
P. Muchiri, L. Pintelon, L. Gelders, and H. Martin, “Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 295–302, 2011.
[7]
J. D. Campbell, “Strategies for Excellence in Maintenance Management Section 3 Planning and Scheduling Resources,” 2015.
[8]
A. Garg and S. G. Deshmukh, “Maintenance management: Literature review and directions,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–238, 2006.
[9]
S. J. L. Chua, N. B. Zubbir, A. S. Ali, and C. P. Au-Yong, “Maintenance of high-rise residential buildings,” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 137–151, 2018.
[10]
S. H. Ding and S. Kamaruddin, “Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 76, no. 5–8, pp. 1263–1283, 2015.
[11]
M. Florkowski and J. Li, Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics, vol. 27, no. 6. 2020.
[12]
R. S. Velmurugan and T. Dhingra, Maintenance strategy selection and its impact in maintenance function: A conceptual framework, vol. 35, no. 12. 2015.
[13]
D. Oprea and G. Mesnita, “The information systems documentation-another problem for project management,” Manag. Inf. Digit. Econ. Issues Solut. - Proc. 6th Int. Bus. Inf. Manag. Assoc. Conf. IBIMA 2006, pp. 332–338, 2006.
[14]
Rifky Febrihanuddin Azis, “Manajemen Risiko Kebijakan Infrastruktur Pembangunan Di Institut Teknologi Sumatera,” Journalbalitbangdalampung.Org, vol. 8, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journalbalitbangdalampung.org/index.php/jip/article/view/180/139.
[15]
A. Cerezo-Narváez, A. Pastor-Fernández, M. Otero-Mateo, and P. Ballesteros-Pérez, Integration of cost and work breakdown structures in the management of construction projects, vol. 10, no. 4. 2020.
[16]
J. M. Simões, C. F. Gomes, and M. M. Yasin, “Changing role of maintenance in business organisations: Measurement versus strategic orientation,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3329–3346, 2016.
[17]
V. MEDAKOVIĆ and B. MARIĆ, “A model of management information system for technical system maintenance.,” Acta Tech. Corvininesis - Bull. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 85–90, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=131028257&lang=es&site=ehost-live.
[18]
K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, Management Information Systems Managing The digital Firm Thirteen Edition Global Edition (SIB). 2014.
[19]
J. W. Ross, C. M. Beath, and D. L. Goodhue, “Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 1998.
[20]
D. Ahn and H. Cha, “Integration of Building Maintenance Data in Application of Building Information Modeling (BIM),” J. Build. Constr. Plan. Res., vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 166–172, 2014.
[21]
S. Liu, B. Xie, L. Tivendal, and C. Liu, “Critical Barriers to BIM Implementation in the AEC Industry,” Int. J. Mark. Stud., vol. 7, no. 6, p. 162, 2015.
[22]
T. R. Devi and V. S. Reddy, “Work Breakdown Structure of the Project,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 683–686, 2012.

Index Terms

  1. Identification of E-Maintenance Dominant Factor that Affect Maintenance Performance of High Rise Buildings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Dominant factor
    2. E-maintenance
    3. High-rise buildings
    4. Maintenance performance

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    APCORISE 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 68 of 110 submissions, 62%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 26
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media