Marsella Khairunnisa
ABSTRACT
In order to improve maintenance performance, several buildings have been implemented e-maintenance system. E-maintenance system itself is a combination of two elements of building maintenance, there are (a) management maintenance consisting of policy, guidelines, and Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), and (b) technology maintenance consisting of information system and Building Information Modeling (BIM). However, during its operational period, currently the implementation of e-maintenance system for high-rise building is considered not to be carried out effectively. In order to adress this concern, it is necessary to find out the factors of e-maintenance system of high rise building that affect the results of maintenance. This study proposes identification of e-maintenance system factors that affect maintenance performance of high-rise building and find out the dominant factor. This study combines the optimization factors of each of the e-maintenance components. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis which produces 26 factors which then tabulated and categorized to determine the dominant factors. The research resulted in five factor categories of e-maintenance system for high rise buildings that affect its maintenance performance, those are risk factor, operational factor, resources factor, corporate culture factor, and technology factor. The result of this study is suggested that the dominant factors of e-maintenance system for high rise buildings that affect the performance of its maintenance is risk factor.
- T. Han and B. S. Yang, “Development of an e-maintenance system integrating advanced techniques,” Comput. Ind., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 569–580, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2006.02.009.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- L. Yan, C. Lu, and N. Y. C. Andrew, “An agent-based platform for web-enabled equipment predictive maintenance,” Proc. - 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. Intell. Agent Technol. IAT’05, vol. 2005, pp. 132–135, 2005, doi: 10.1109/IAT.2005.38.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Shah Ali, “Cost decision making in building maintenance practice in Malaysia,” J. Facil. Manag., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 298–306, 2009, doi: 10.1108/14725960910990044.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. I. Wardahni, L. S. Riantini, Y. Latief, and R. A. Machfudiyanto, “Identification of e-maintenance elements and indicators that affect maintenance performance of high rise building: A literature review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1007, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1007/1/012021.Google Scholar
- I. M. Shohet, “Key performance indicators for maintenance of health-care facilities,” Facilities, vol. 21, no. August, pp. 5–12, 2003, doi: 10.1108/02632770310460496.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Muchiri, L. Pintelon, L. Gelders, and H. Martin, “Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 295–302, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Campbell, “Strategies for Excellence in Maintenance Management Section 3 Planning and Scheduling Resources,” 2015.Google Scholar
- A. Garg and S. G. Deshmukh, “Maintenance management: Literature review and directions,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–238, 2006, doi: 10.1108/13552510610685075.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. J. L. Chua, N. B. Zubbir, A. S. Ali, and C. P. Au-Yong, “Maintenance of high-rise residential buildings,” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 137–151, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-09-2017-0038.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. H. Ding and S. Kamaruddin, “Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 76, no. 5–8, pp. 1263–1283, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Florkowski and J. Li, Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics, vol. 27, no. 6. 2020.Google Scholar
- R. S. Velmurugan and T. Dhingra, Maintenance strategy selection and its impact in maintenance function: A conceptual framework, vol. 35, no. 12. 2015.Google Scholar
- D. Oprea and G. Mesnita, “The information systems documentation-another problem for project management,” Manag. Inf. Digit. Econ. Issues Solut. - Proc. 6th Int. Bus. Inf. Manag. Assoc. Conf. IBIMA 2006, pp. 332–338, 2006.Google Scholar
- Rifky Febrihanuddin Azis, “Manajemen Risiko Kebijakan Infrastruktur Pembangunan Di Institut Teknologi Sumatera,” Journalbalitbangdalampung.Org, vol. 8, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journalbalitbangdalampung.org/index.php/jip/article/view/180/139.Google Scholar
- A. Cerezo-Narváez, A. Pastor-Fernández, M. Otero-Mateo, and P. Ballesteros-Pérez, Integration of cost and work breakdown structures in the management of construction projects, vol. 10, no. 4. 2020.Google Scholar
- J. M. Simões, C. F. Gomes, and M. M. Yasin, “Changing role of maintenance in business organisations: Measurement versus strategic orientation,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3329–3346, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1106611.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. MEDAKOVIĆ and B. MARIĆ, “A model of management information system for technical system maintenance.,” Acta Tech. Corvininesis - Bull. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 85–90, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=131028257&lang=es&site=ehost-live.Google Scholar
- K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, Management Information Systems Managing The digital Firm Thirteen Edition Global Edition (SIB). 2014.Google Scholar
- J. W. Ross, C. M. Beath, and D. L. Goodhue, “Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 1998.Google Scholar
- D. Ahn and H. Cha, “Integration of Building Maintenance Data in Application of Building Information Modeling (BIM),” J. Build. Constr. Plan. Res., vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 166–172, 2014, doi: 10.4236/jbcpr.2014.22015.Google Scholar
- S. Liu, B. Xie, L. Tivendal, and C. Liu, “Critical Barriers to BIM Implementation in the AEC Industry,” Int. J. Mark. Stud., vol. 7, no. 6, p. 162, 2015, doi: 10.5539/ijms.v7n6p162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. R. Devi and V. S. Reddy, “Work Breakdown Structure of the Project,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 683–686, 2012.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Identification of E-Maintenance Dominant Factor that Affect Maintenance Performance of High Rise Buildings
Recommendations
Development of an e-maintenance system integrating advanced techniques
Special issue: E-maintenanceIn recent years, globalization and fast growth of communication technologies, computer and information technologies have changed the pattern of maintenance. Accordingly, a new maintenance, e-maintenance has emerged and has been gradually replacing the ...
A framework for effective management of condition based maintenance programs in the context of industrial development of E-Maintenance strategies
This paper presents a framework and a template to clarify the concepts and structure behind a given condition-based maintenance solution.This paper discusses about the necessity of CBM management approaches in complex contest like E-Maintenance ...
Web services system for distributed technology upgrade within an e-maintenance framework
OTM'07: Proceedings of the 2007 OTM confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems - Volume Part INowadays, industrial maintenance is one of the most important tasks in the industry because its cost is too high, usually due to poor maintenance decisions. Traditionally, corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance are performed, but both of them,...
Comments