skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468315acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling for Services Evaluation of Trans Bus at Surabaya Based on User's Perspective

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transportation is one of the problems faced by many countries with a high population with limited urban areas and road capacity. Another problem with the transportation system is the poor quality of services. Surabaya is one of several most populated cities in Indonesia. According to data from the Central Statistics Agency in 2018, the population in Surabaya reached 2.89 million with a population density of 8,844 people per KM2. The Government already took action about this issue. They would like to build an urban transportation system which is the trans bus, namely Suroboyo Bus. This is a pilot project from the Government to reduce congestion in Surabaya by using plastic waste as innovation payment. To build a good urban transportation system, good services of quality is a must to be implemented. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate service quality in a measured, structured, and comprehensive way. SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) will be suited to this problem because it can accommodate the complexity of evaluation models with many constructs and indicators. Besides, SEM can provide results to the core of the research, so that researchers can determine the weight of each indicator. In the end, the researcher can provide accurate recommendations for improving the quality of services. There will be 350 respondents which are then processed through AMOS. A model is built using 28 indicators with 8 independent variables and 1 dependent variable (user satisfaction). Based on the calculation results, it shows that the model has met the assumptions and fit after the first modification was made. The output obtained is that 3 independent variables already had a positive influence on user satisfaction. Meanwhile, 5 other independent variables become input and suggestions for improvement to service providers. The five variables are connectivity, information, time, friendliness, and security.

References

  1. Nukyanto, D. P. 2019. Statistik Daerah Kota Surabaya. Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. No. Publication: 35780.1936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank. 2019. Asian Development Outlook 2019 Update. Metro Manila, Philippines http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/FLS190445-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. 2012. Structural Equation Modelling for Analysing Passengers Perceptions about Railway Services. University of Calabria, Italy. 96 -106. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.729.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Irfan, S. M, Kee, D. M. H., and Shahbaz, S. 2012. Service Quality and Rail Transport in Pakistan: A Passenger Perspective. COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, Pakistan and Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. 361 – 369. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.03.3044.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brakewood, C., Barbeau, S. and Watkins, K. 2014. An Experiment Evaluating The Impacts of Real-Time Transit Information on Bus Riders in Tampa, Florida. Department of Civil Engineering The City College of New York, Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida, and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology. 409-422. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Georgiadis, G., Politis, I., and Papaioannou, P. 2014. Measuring and Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Bus Public Transport System. Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. 84 – 91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.035.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Grisé, E., El-Geneidy, A. 2016. Evaluating the Relationship between Socially (dis)Advantage Neighborhoods and Customer Satisfaction of Bus Service In London, U.K. School of Urban Planning, McGill University, Québec, Canada. 166 – 175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang, Y., Cao, M., Liu, Y.,Ye, R., Gao, X., Ma, L. 2020. Public Transport Equity in Shenyang: Using Structural Equation Modelling. Hyder Consulting, School of Architecture and Cities, University of Westminster, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences. 1 – 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dilip, A., Devika, C.A., George, J.K., Winto, J.P., Rahul R. 2020. Suitability of Existing Public Bus Routes. Department of Civil Engineering, ASIET, India. e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 17, Issue 3 Ser. III (May - June 2020), PP 48-63. DOI: 10.9790/1684-1703034863.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adibah, A. N., and Manullang, O. R. 2020. The Assessment of BRT Trans Semarang Service Quality. University of Muhammadiyah Malang and Diponegoro University, Indonesia. In proceeding of 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences (2nd InCEAS). DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/771/1/012045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo, J. M. Del and Benitez, F. G. 2012. A Methodology for Modeling and Identifying Users Satisfaction Issues in Public Transport Systems Based on Users Surveys. Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Seville: Spain. 1104 – 1114. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.825.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wan, D., Kamga, C., Hao, W., Sugiura, A., and Beaton, E. B. 2016. Customer Satisfaction with Bus Rapid Transit: a Study of New York City Select Bus Service Applying Structural Equation Modeling. Department of Civil Engineering, City College of New York, City University of New York and Transit Development Group, New York City Department of Transportation, USA. DOI: 10.1007/s12469-016-0135-x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oña, J.d., Oña, R.d.,Eboli, L. and Mazzula, G. 2013. Perceived Service Quality in Bus Transit Service: A Structural Equation Approach. TRYSE Research Group, University of Granada, Department of Civil Engineering, Spain and University of Calabria, Department of Civil Engineering: Italy. 219 – 226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, L.T and Bentler, P.M. 2009. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Department of Psychology University of California, Santa Cruz and University of California, Los Angeles. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6:1, 1-55, DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Adeboye, N.O., Fagoyinbo, I.S., and Olatayo, T.O. 2014. Estimation of the Effect of Multicollinearity on the Standard Error for Regression Coefficients. Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Federal Polytechnic Ilaro and Department of Mathematical Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University. e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN:2319-765X. Volume 10, Issue 3 Ver. I (May-Jun. 2014), PP 00-00. DOI: 10.9790/5728-10411620Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghozali, I. 2014. Konsep dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 22. Badan Penerbit: Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling for Services Evaluation of Trans Bus at Surabaya Based on User's Perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      May 2021
      672 pages
      ISBN:9781450390385
      DOI:10.1145/3468013

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format