skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468322acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of Spare Part Classification Methodology Considering Maintainability, Criticality, and Inventory Management Aspects in The Oil Processing Industry

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Management of spare parts in maintenance activities is indispensable for several companies, especially the manufacturing industry. The insufficiency of spare part inventories, results in the potential of equipment breakdown which has an impact on costs for equipment downtime due to damage. Otherwise, inventory excess may result in high storage costs and dead stock of materials that have been unused up to a certain period. In addition, the company should be able to manage the inventory level of the spare parts so that their quality is maintained and to prevent a decline in quality; therefore, it is ready to use whenever the spare part is needed. Spare part management involves both the maintenance aspect and the inventory aspect because they are interrelated. In this research, we determine how to classify spare parts considering these two aspects. This classification will be divided into two parts; the first is the classification of spare parts based on the function of spare parts to the equipment and impact in terms of production, health, safety, and environment. The second part is multi-criteria classification using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the criteria of lead time, unit price, the probability of failure, and availability of equipment. The two parts are combined in a decision diagram to determine the final criticality of the spare part from all these aspects. The methodology was developed in one of the oil processing industries in Indonesia and can be implemented as a step in establishing inventory management policies. From the research results, it is known that the development of the methodology can obtain the criticality level of spare parts so that the priority of spare part supply in the warehouse can be determined.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Xi Chen, He Ren, Cees Bil, and Yongquan Sun. 2015. Integration of structural health monitoring with scheduled maintenance of aircraft composite structures. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 264-283. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2015.073525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S.V. Conceição, G.L.C. Da Silva, Dawei Lu, N.T.R. Nunes, and G.C. Pedrosa. 2015. A demand classification scheme for spare part inventory model subject to stochastic demand and lead time. Production Planning & Control, 1318-1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1033497Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Cavalieri, M. Garetti, M. Macchi, and R. Pinto. 2008. A decision-making framework for managing maintenance spare parts. Production planning & control, 379-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537280802034471Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Gopalakrishnan and A.K. Banerji. 2013. Maintenance and spare parts management. PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Janne Huiskonen. 2001. Maintenance spare parts logistics: Special characteristics and strategic choices. International journal of production economics, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00112-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. An Molenaers, Herman Baets, Liliane Pintelon, and Geert Waeyenbergh. 2012. Criticality classification of spare parts: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Dekker, M.J. Kleijn, and P.J. de Rooij. 1998. A spare parts stocking policy based on equipment criticality. International Journal of production economics, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00050-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eric Porras and Rommert Dekker. 2008. An inventory control system for spare parts at a refinery: An empirical comparison of different re-order point methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 101-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Catarina Teixeira, Isabel Lopes, and Manuel Figueiredo. 2018. Classification methodology for spare parts management combining maintenance and logistics perspectives. Journal of Management Analytics, 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2018.1436989Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Bacchetti, R. Plebani, N. Saccani, and A. Syntetos. 2010. Spare parts classification and inventory management: a case study. Salford Business School Working Papers Series, University of Salford Manchester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Stoll, R. Kopf, J. Schneider, and G. Lanza. 2015. Criticality analysis of spare parts management: a multi-criteria classification regarding a cross-plant central warehouse strategy. Production Engineering, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0602-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Puspitasari Andra Sukma, Amanda Amadea Sahara, and Agustina Eunike. 2019. Minimizing Corrective Maintenance Cost through Spare Parts Classification and Inventory Control. In 2019 1st International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System (ICOEMIS 2019), 444-450. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoemis-19.2019.59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S.M.Hatefi, S.A. Torabi, and P. Bagheri. 2014. Multi-criteria ABC inventory classification with mixed quantitative and qualitative criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 776-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.838328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Vincent Gaspersz. 1998. Production Planning and Inventory Control Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem Terintegrasi MRP II dan JIT Menuju Manufakturing 21. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta, Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan. 2006. ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Computers & operations research, 695-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mladen Bošnjaković. 2010. Multicriteria inventory model for spare parts. Tehnički vjesnik, 499-504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S.I. Gass and T. Rapcsák. 2004. Singular value decomposition in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00755-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Bevilacqua, F.E. Ciarapica, and G. Giacchetta. 2000. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Marcello Braglia, Andrea Grassi, and Roberto Montanari. 2004. Multi‐attribute classification method for spare parts inventory management. Journal of quality in maintenance engineering, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410526875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Development of Spare Part Classification Methodology Considering Maintainability, Criticality, and Inventory Management Aspects in The Oil Processing Industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      May 2021
      672 pages
      ISBN:9781450390385
      DOI:10.1145/3468013

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format