skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468325acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Component Criteria Framework for Selection of Aircraft Spare Parts Inventory Cooperation Strategy

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper will present about spare parts inventory strategies in the airline industry. As an operator, the airline should have strategies to fulfill requested parts in a timely manner. The strategies solo, ad-hoc, cooperative pooling, commercial pooling, and commercial leasing are commonly used. The aim of this paper is to find out which criteria are considered important for selecting each of strategies. Total 9 criteria were identified through literature review and discussion with experts. In this paper, the preference value of all criteria which were obtained from the survey to whom have expertise in aircraft spare parts management were then analyzed with the best-worst method to prioritize and rank the criteria for each type of spare parts inventory strategies. The present study provides valuable research implications which can be used as a framework in deciding the criteria of aircraft parts for spare parts inventory management.

References

  1. Iata, 2015. 2015 IATA Global Passenger Survey. Retrieved Oct 19, 2020 from https://www.iata.org/contentassetsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jani Kilpi, Juuso Toyli, Ari Vepsalainen. 2008. Cooperative strategies for the availability service of repairable aircraft components. Elsevier B.V, 0925- 5273. https://doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kinnison, H., 2004. Aviation Maintenance management. McGraw Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Regattieri, M. Gamberi, R. Gamberini, R. Manzini. 2005. Managing lumpy demand for aircraft spare parts. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.06.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marcello Braglia, Andrea Grassi, Roberto Montanari. 2004. Multi-attribute classification method for spare parts inventory management. Emerald. DOI 10.1108/13552510410526875Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Iata, 2015. Best Practices for Component Maintenance Cost Management. IATA. Montreal. CanadaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jingyao Gu, Guoqing Zhang, Kevin W. Li. 2014. Efficient aircraft spare parts inventory management under demand uncertainty. Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.09.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Iata, 2015. Guidance Material and Best Practices for Inventory Management. IATA. Montreal. CanadaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jafar Rezaei. 2014. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Elsevier Ltd, 0305-0483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Manivel Palanisamy, Arivazhagan Pugalendhi, Rajesh Ranganathan. 2020. Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best–worst method (BWM). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05110-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartanto Wong, Dirk Van Oudheusden, Dirk Cattrysse, 2006. Cost allocation in spare parts inventory pooling. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2006.01.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Albert F. Lowas III, Frank W. Ciarallo. 2015. Reliability and operations: Keys to lumpy aircraft spare parts demands. Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.09.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Keivanpour, D. Ait Kadi, 2019. The Effect of “Internet of Things” on Aircraft Spare Parts Inventory Management. Elsevier Ltd. Doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.556Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format