skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468329acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding of Variables that Creates Cash Flow Dynamics for the Sustainable Financing of Construction Project

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cash flow is one of the crucial things for the success of a construction project. Several components of cash flow, including advance payment, retention, payment term, capital, work progress, have an impact on project finances so that they shall be planned and controlled by the contractor. Therefore, it is essential to understand the interconnectivity dynamics between these cash-flow components within the project's context. This paper develops a conceptual model using a causal loop diagram to highlight project cash flow challenges in construction. By using an industrial building construction project as a case study, all the components may illustrate how they interact with each other and gain insights to develop a quantitative model.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

APCORISE_2021_Presentation_Paper_38.mp4

mp4

83.2 MB

References

  1. Akhmad Hidayatno, Andri D. Setiawan, Armand O. Moeis, I Made Wikananda Supartha, Irvanu Rahman, and Eddie Widiono. 2020. Investigating Policies on Improving Household Rooftop Photovoltaics Adoption in Indonesia. Renewable Energy, Vol. 156, pp. 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.106Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessandro Ancarani, Calogero Guccio, and Ilde Rizzo. 2016. The Role of Firms’ Qualification in Public Contracts Execution: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 554-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-04-2016-B006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alfred M. Chitongo, and Leon Pretorius. 2017. Engineering Consultant Project Cash Flow Controls: An Empirically-Supported System Dynamics Conceptual Model. In Proceedings of Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) ’17: Technology Management for Interconnected World. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Elisabeth Viles, Natalia Carolina Rudeli, and Adrian Santilli. 2020. Causes of Delay in Construction Projects: A Quantitative Analysis. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2019-0024Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gary D. Holt, Paul O. Olomolaiye, and Frank C. Harris. 1995. A Review of Contractor Selection Practice in the U.K. Construction Industry. Building and Environment, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(95)00008-TGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hong-Long Chen, William J. O'Brien, and Zohar J. Herbsman. 2005. Assessing the Accuracy of Cash Flow Models: The Significance of Payment Conditions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(669)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hyung K. Park, Seung H. Han, and Jeffrey S. Russell. 2005. Cash Flow Forecasting Model for General Contractors Using Moving Weights of Cost Categories. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp. 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:4(164)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. International Federation of Consulting Engineers. 1999. Conditions of Contract for Construction: for Building and Engineering Works Designed by the Employer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Masoud Mohammad Sharifi and Morteza Bagherpour. 2015. Optimizing Cash-Flow-at-Risk in Construction Projects: A Cost Reduction Approach. Periodica Polytechnica. Civil Engineering, Vol. 60, Issue 3, pp. 337-344. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7884Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Regulation no 14. 2020. Standards and Guidelines for Procurement of Construction Services Through Providers. Republic of Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Regulation no 31. 2015. Standards and Guidelines for Procurement of Construction Work & Consulting Services. Republic of Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohamed M. Marzouk, Ahmed A. El Kherbawy, and Mostafa Khalifa. 2013. Factors influencing sub-contractors selection in construction projects. Housing and Building National Research Center Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.05.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ng Ghim Hwee, Robert L. K. Tiong. 2002. Model on cash flow forecasting and risk analysis for contracting firms. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, Issue 5, pp. 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00037-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Presidential Regulation no 16. 2018. Government Procurement of Goods/Services. Republic of Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Qingbin Cui, Makarand Hastak, and Daniel Halpin. 2010. Systems Analysis of Project Cash Flow Management Strategies. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003702484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tarek Zayed and Yaqiong Liu. 2014. Cash Flow Modeling for Construction Projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 170-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2012-0082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wenhua Hou, Xing Liu, and Deqiang Chen. 2011. Payment Problems, Cash Flow and Profitability of Construction Project: A System Dynamics Model. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 1266- 1272. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055891Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Will A.H. Thissen and Warren E. Walker. 2013. Public Policy Analysis: New Developments. Springer Science & Business Media, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4602-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding of Variables that Creates Cash Flow Dynamics for the Sustainable Financing of Construction Project

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      May 2021
      672 pages
      ISBN:9781450390385
      DOI:10.1145/3468013

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format