skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468340acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conceptual Design Assessment Method for Collaborative CAD System

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer Aided Design (CAD) technology has been developed for years and is used extensively in the detail design phase. Unfortunately, CAD is still unable to fully support the collaborative design activity or the early design phases of the design process, such as the conceptual design phase. Due to the high creativity needed in the conceptual design phase, there will usually be a number of different ideas and there is a need to converge the different designs into one design that can be further elaborated into the detail design phase. On the other hand, finding an optimal design is difficult in this phase as the designs usually do not have sufficient detail to be assessed quantitatively. The problem is even more pronounced in collaborative conceptual design, as the number of designs will increase and arriving at an agreement for the best design without a proper assessment method is hard to do. This paper will introduce a conceptual design assessment method that can be used in a collaborative design situation. The method uses a combination of Hurwicz criterion and an estimated range of the product function fulfillment to determine the best design. A case study will also be used to illustrate the use of the method. The method shows a potential to be used in a CAD system designed to support the collaborative conceptual design phase.

References

  1. Probst, L., Frideres, L, Pedersen, B., Lide, S. (2015): Collaborative Economy: Collaborative production and the maker economy. European UnionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Goel, A. K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M. (2012): Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative – Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design. Computer Aided Design, 44, 879-900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chen, X., Gao, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, S. (2012): Multi-level assembly model for top-down design of mechanical products. Computer Aided Design, 44, 1033-1048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., Pardasani, A. (2002): Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends. Computer Aided Design, 34, 981-996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Vuletic, T., Duffy, A., Hay, L., McTeague, C., Pidgeon, L., Grealy, M. (2018): The challenges in computer supported conceptual engineering design. Computers in Industry, 95, 22–37Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tiwari, V., Jain, P. K., & Tandon, P. (2016). Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chin, K-S., Wong, T.N., (1996) Knowledge-based Evaluation for the Conceptual Design Development of Injection Molding Parts. Engineering Application Artificial Intelligence, 9 (4), 359 – 376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kim, Y.S., Kim, K.-Y. (2012): DCR-based causal design knowledge evaluation method and system for future CAD applications. Computer Aided Design, 44, 947-960Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Louhichi, B., Rivest, L. (2014): Maintaining consistency between CAD elements in collaborative design using association management and propagation. Computers in Industry, 65, 124-135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eltaief, A., Louhichi, B., Remy, S. (2018): Associations management and change propagation in the CAD assembly. Computers in Industry, 98, 134–144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andreadis, G., Fourtounis, G., Bouzakis K. (2015): Collaborative design in the era of cloud computing. Advances in Engineering Software, 81, 66-72Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Moldovan, C.C., Staturetu, I., (2016): A virtual prototyping system research and implementation in a collaborative PLM environment. Procedia Technology, 22, 1006-1013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Martinez-Maldonado, R., Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., Thompson, K., Hernandez-Leo, D., Dimitriadis, Y., Prieto, L.P., Wardak, D. (2017): Supporting collaborative design activity in a multi-user digital design ecology. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 327-342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Komoto, H.,Tomiyama, T. (2012): A framework for computer-aided conceptual design and its application to system architecting of mechatronic products. Computer Aided Design, 44, 931-946Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Khan, S., Tuncer, B. (2019): Gesture and speech elicitation for 3D CAD modeling in conceptual design. Automation in Construction, 106, 102847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mukherjee, A., Liu, C.R. (1997): Conceptual Design, Manufacturability Evaluation And Preliminary Process Planning Using Function-Form Relationships In Stamped Metal Parts. Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 13 (3), 253-270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Clayton, M.J., Kunz, J.C., Fischer, M.A. (1996): Rapid Conceptual Design Evaluation Using a Virtual Product Model. Engineering Application Artificial Intelligence, 9 (4), 439 – 451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Delgado-Maciel, J., Cortes-Robles, G., Sanchez-Ramirez, C., Garcia-Alcaraz, J., Mendez-Contreras, J.M. (2020): The evaluation of conceptual design through dynamic simulation: A proposal based on TRIZ and system Dynamics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Weyrich, M., Klein, P., Steden, F. (2014): Reuse of modules for mechatronic modeling and evaluation of manufacturing systems in the conceptual design and basic engineering phase. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic ControlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chami, M., Bruel, J.M. (2015): Towards an Integrated Conceptual Design Evaluation of Mechatronic Systems: The SysDICE Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 51, 650–659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Moulianitis, V.C., Zachiotis, G.-A.D., Aspragathos, N.A. (2018): A new index based on mechatronics abilities for the conceptual design evaluation. Mechatronics, 49, 67–76Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. de Silva, C.W., Behbahani, S. (2013): A design paradigm for mechatronic systems. Mechatronics, 23, 960–966Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Akay, D., Kulak, O., Henson, B., (2011): Conceptual design evaluation using interval type-2 fuzzy information axiom. Computers in Industry, 62, 138–146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Couturier, P., Imoussaten, A. (2015): A qualitative method for evaluation in conceptual design. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48-3, 721–726Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Liu, W., Tan, R., Cao, G., Zhang, Z., Huang, S., Liu, L. (2019): A proposed radicality evaluation method for design ideas at conceptual design stage. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 132, 141–152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shah, J.J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Smith, S.M. (2003): Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24 (2), 111-134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Chan, J., Dow, S.P., Schunn, C.D. (2015): Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies, 36 (C), 31-58Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ismail, I.N., Halim, K.A., Sahari, K.S.M., Anuar, A., Jalal, M.F.A., Syaifoelida, F., Eqwan, M. R., (2016): Design and Development of Platform Deployment Arm (PDA) For Boiler Header Inspection at Thermal Power Plant by Using the House of Quality (HOQ) Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 105, 296 – 303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hurwicz, L. (1951): The Generalised Bayes Minimax Principle: A Criterion for Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Cowles Comission Discussion Paper, 355, 7p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wen, M., Iwamura, K. (2008): Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion. European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 627–635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format