skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468341acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulation Modeling and Performance Analysis of Production Schedule of Polymer Dispersion Plant with Limited Storage Tank

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Scheduling is a crucial point in the manufacturing process of Polymer Dispersion in a Polymer Dispersion Plant, especially for a plant that has a limited amount of storage tank. The optimization of scheduling is needed to avoid any bottleneck and achieve the optimum flow time and production cost by simulation modeling with Discrete Event Simulation. The best scenario on assigning and sequencing the product to be produced within the horizon of time can be observed. In this study, we analyze scheduling performance by testing all factors with two criteria: average product flow time and the cost of production. We conduct three phases process in this frame fork. In the first phase, we create the design of experiments to state the pre-defined process factor that affects the performance criteria. We make a simulation model of the Polymer dispersion plant based on the actual data and the second phase. The last phase calculates the aggregate of two performance criteria with Grey Relational Analysis to determine the best scenario. Based on the analysis in this study, among the other factors, the quantity rule and the reaction time rule have the most significant effect on the performance of production scheduling in the chemical plant, which the Polymer Dispersion Plant represents.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Video_submission_subagiyo.mp4

mp4

21.9 MB

References

  1. Kiran, D. R. (2019) Production Planning and Control: A Comprehensive Approach, Elsevier Science & Technology, ProQuest E-book Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5790849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker KR (1974) Introduction to sequencing and scheduling, Wiley, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dominic, P. D. D., Kaliyamoorthy, S., & Kumar, M. S. (2004). Efficient dispatching rules for dynamic job shop scheduling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(1–2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1534-5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stevenson, M., Hendry, L. C., & Kingsman, B. G. (2005).the applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry. International Journal of Production Research, 43(March 2005), 869–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754042000298520Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashby, J. R., & Uzsoy, R. (1995). Scheduling in a Single-Stage Production System. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14(4), 290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andradóttir, S., Healy, K. J., Withers, D. H., Nelson, B. L., Watson, E. F., Medeiros, D. J., & Sadowski, R. P. (1997). Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, 765–772Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Krige, D., Bekker, J., & Schutte, C. (2009). Simulation Based Online Scheduling in A Make To Order Job Shop. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(November 2009), 205–217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ahmed, I., & Fisher, W. W. (1992). Due Date Assignment, Job Order Release, and Sequencing Interaction in Job Shop Scheduling. Decision Sciences, 23(3), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1992.tb00409.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Tsai, C. H., Chang, G. T., & Li, R. K. (1997). Integrating order release control with due-date assignment rules. International Journal of Production Research, 35(12), 3379–3392. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497194138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jayamohan, M. S., & Rajendran, C. (2000). New dispatching rules for shop scheduling: A step forward. International Journal of Production Research, 38(October 2014), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400189301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sharma, P., & Jain, A. (2015). Performance analysis of dispatching rules in a stochastic dynamic job shop manufacturing system. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 10(4), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sousa, P., & Moreira, M. (2007). Performance Analysis of Job-Shop Production Systems under Different Order Release Control Parameters. World Congress on Engineering, II, 2–7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu, H. L., Huang, G. Q., & Yang, H. D. (2011). Integrating order review/release and dispatching rules for assembly job shop scheduling using a simulation approach. International Journal of Production Research, 49(February 2015), 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903524490Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sabuncuoglu, I., & Karapinar, H. Y. (1999). Analysis of order review/release problems in production systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00248-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Newman, W. R., & Maffei, M. J. (1999). Managing the job shop: simulating the effects of flexibility, order release mechanisms and sequencing rules. Integrated Manufacturing Systems,10(5),266–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069910285247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Paul, M., Sridharan, R., & Radha Ramanan, T. (2015). An Investigation of Order Review/Release Policies and Dispatching Rules for Assembly Job Shops with Multi Objective Criteria. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.234Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wagner, B. J., & Ragatz, G. L. (1994). The impact of lot splitting on due date performance. Journal of Operations Management, 12(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90003-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Baykasoǧlu, A., Göçken, M., & Unutmaz, Z. D. (2008). New approaches to due date assignment in job shops. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Chang, F. C. R. (1994). A study of factors affecting due-date predictability in a simulated dynamic job shop. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 13(6), 393– 400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6125(95)90063-QGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cheng, T. C. E., & Jiang, J. (1998). Job shop scheduling for missed due-date performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 34(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00317-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Vinod, V., & Sridharan, R. (2011). Simulation modeling and analysis of due-date assignment methods and scheduling decision rules in a dynamic job shop production system. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.08.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Faizul, H., & Ziaul, H. (1995). The sensitivity of rule combinations for scheduling in a hybrid job shop. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510080562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Vinod, V., & Sridharan, R. (2008). Scheduling a dynamic job shop production system with sequence-dependent setups: An experimental study. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ekren, B. Y., & Ornek, A. M. (2008). A simulation based experimental design to analyze factors affecting production flow time. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,16(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Winston, W. L. (Indiana U. (2004). Operations Research (Fourth Ed). Thomson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., Sadowski, D.A., (1998), "Simulation with Arena (including Arena Academic Version on CD-ROM)", Assembly Automation, Vol. 18 No. 4. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2116/10.1108/aa.1998.03318dad.0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments (Fifth Edit). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuo, Y., Yang, T. and Huang, G.W. (2008) “The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55, 80–93Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format