skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468347acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Relief Supply Control Model for Prolonged Natural Disasters with Uncertain Demand

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The fulfillment of relief goods for disaster victims during the emergency response is one of the most important issues to be solved in the humanitarian logistics world. However, some disaster events facing emergency response time in years, such as prolonged volcano eruption. It makes the victims will stay at the evacuation post in an indeterminate time with the uncertain relief goods demand. This condition makes the related government has to prepare the logistics in years. This paper will describe and formulate such a problem in the stochastic inventory control model for a multiple-item single-location inventory system and will be optimized using Sample Average Approximation and Monte Carlo simulation as the method. We will demonstrate using the case of simultaneous eruption disaster in Mt. Sinabung. The numerical result shows that the proposed model can produce a cost reduction and the inventory service level will reach more than 99%, wherein the reality, the service level is always less than 95%.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

video.mp4

mp4

26.7 MB

References

  1. Benita M. Beamon and Stephen A. Kotleba. 2006. Inventory modelling for complex emergencies in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/13675560500453667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Benita M. Beamon and Stephen A. Kotleba. 2006. Inventory management support systems for emergency humanitarian relief operations in South Sudan. The International Journal of Logistics Management 17 (2) 187–212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. David F. Pyke, Douglas J. Thomas, and Edward Allen Silver. 2016. Inventory and Production Management in Supply Chains. Florida: CRC PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Emmett J. Lodree Jr., Kandace N. Ballard, and Chang H. Song. 2012. Pre-positioning hurricane supplies in a commercial supply chain. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(4), 291–305. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2012.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Emmett J. Lodree Jr. and Selda Taskin. 2009. Supply chain planning for hurricane response with wind speed information updates. Computers & Operations Research Volume 36, Issue 1 pages 2–15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eren Erman Ozguven and Kaan Ozbay. 2013. A secure and efficient inventory management system for disasters. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies page 171–196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gina Galindo Pacheco and Rajan Batta. 2016. Forecast-driven model for prepositioning supplies in preparation for a foreseen hurricane. Journal of the Operational Research Society 67 pages 98–113Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jane Bullock and George Haddow. 2006. Introduction to emergency management. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: ElsevierGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jessica H. McCoy and Margaret L. Brandeau. 2011. Efficient stockpiling and shipping policies for humanitarian relief: UNHCR's inventory challenge. OR Spectrum 33 pages 673–698Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Laura Consuelos Salas, Manuel Robles Cárdenas, and Muhong Zhang. 2012. Inventory policies for humanitarian aid during hurricanes. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences Volume 46 Issue 4 page 272–280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohammad S. Roni, Mingzhou Jin, and Sandra D. Eksioglu. 2015. A hybrid inventory management system responding to regular demand and surge demand. Omega volume 52 page 190–200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohammad S. Roni, Sandra D. Eksioglu, Mingzhou Jin, and Saleh Mamun. 2016. A hybrid inventory policy with split delivery under regular and surge demand. International Journal of Production Economics Volume 172 pages 126–136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rubel Das and Shinya Hanaoka. 2014. Relief inventory modelling with stochastic lead-time and demand. European Journal of Operational Research Volume 235, Issue 3, pages 616–623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sari Bahagiarti Kusumayudha, Puji Lestari, and Eko Teguh Paripurno. 2018. Eruption Characteristic of the Sleeping Volcano, Sinabung, North Sumatera, Indonesia, and SMS Gateway for Disaster Early Warning System. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 50(1) pages 70-77. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.17574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Selda Taskin and Emmett J. Lodree Jr. 2011. A Bayesian decision model with hurricane forecast updates for emergency supplies inventory management. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (6) pages 1098–1108Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Shao-Long Hu, Chuan-Feng Han, and Ling-Peng Meng. 2017. Stochastic optimization for joint decision making of inventory and procurement in humanitarian relief. Computers & Industrial Engineering. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tito Homem-de-Mello and Güzin Bayraksan. 2014. Monte Carlo sampling-based methods for stochastic optimization. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(1), 56–85. doi:10.1016/j.sorms.2014.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Riki Kawase, Junji Urata, and Takamasa Iryo. 2019. Optimal Control Strategy for Relief Supply Considering Information and Demand Uncertainty after a Major Disaster. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 31-38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wang Chi Cheung and David Simchi-Levi. 2019. Sampling-Based Approximation Schemes for Capacitated Stochastic Inventory Control Models. Mathematics of Operations Research, Volume 42, No. 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jefri Susetio. 2016. ‘Sudah Dua Pekan Kiriman Logistik Terhenti untuk Sembilan Posko Pengungsi Sinabung’. Tribunnews.com, 27 February 2016, accessed 3 April 2021, < https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2016/02/27/sudah-dua-pekan-kiriman-logistik-terhenti-untuk-sembilan-posko-pengungsi-sinabung.>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Issha Harruma. 2017. ‘Logistik untuk Pengungsi Gunung Sinabung Makin Menipis’. Republika.co.id, 3 August 2017, accessed 3 April 2021. <ttps://www.republika.co.id/berita/ou3xp3361/logistik-untuk-pengungsi-gunung-sinabung-makin-menipis>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alexander Shapiro. 2003. Monte Carlo Sampling Approach to Stochastic Programming. ESAIM: PROCEEDINGS, 65-73Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Detlev Reiter. 2008. The Monte Carlo Method, an Introduction. In Computational Many-Particle Physics (page. 63-78). Heidelberg: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robin Schmidt, Matthias Voigt, Michele Pisaroni, Fabio Nobile, Penelope Leyland, Jordi Pons-Prats and Gabriel Bugeda. 2018. General Introduction to Monte Carlo and Multi-level Monte Carlo Methods. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, 265–278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format