ABSTRACT
The cement industry has a crucial role in infrastructure development during an economic growth process, but they are considered a threat to sustainability. It is reflected in the increase and its relationship with high energy consumption and pollution of the environment. Around 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are accounted for by the cement industry alone. The Indonesian government must address this issue by exploring policies that drive producers to implement the green manufacturing principle. This study aims to conceptualize the systemic impact of policies in green manufacturing for the cement industry. The study results are described in diagram of causal loop to build model that would better understand cement industry variables that support Indonesia's sustainable aspects.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Robi Kurniawan and Shunsuke Managi. 2018. Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: an Assesment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54:3, 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1450962.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Costanza, Rudolf de Groot, Paul Sutton, Sander van der Ploeg, Sharolyn J. Anderson, Ida Kubiszewski, Stephen Farber, and R. Kerry Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, Volume 26, 152-158, ISSN 0959-3780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zahra Jokar and Alireza Mokhtar. 2018. Policy making in the cement industry for CO2 mitigation on the path way of sustainable development- A system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.286Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. G. Olivier and Jeroen A.H.W. Peters. 2020. Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google Scholar
- Frank Zeman. 2009. Oxygen combustion in cement production. Energy Procedia, No. 1, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.027Google ScholarCross Ref
- SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.sdg2030indonesia.org/Google Scholar
- Volker Hoenig and Robin Harass. Evaluation of the energy performance of cement kilns in the context of co-processing. European Cement Research Academy (ECRA)Google Scholar
- John Pius John. 2017. An Investigation for Energy Sustainability in Cement Industries in Tanzania: The Case of Mbeya Cement. ProQuest Number: 27610402Google Scholar
- César Valderrama, Ricard Granados, José Luis Cortina, Carles M. Gasol, Manel Guillem, and Alejandro Josa. 2012. Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study. 25(none), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.055Google Scholar
- M.J. Nichola, R. Clift, V. Azapagic, F.C. Walker, and D.E. Porter. 2000. Determination of “Best Available Techniques” for integrated pollution prevention and control: a life cycle approach. Trans. IChemE 78, 193-203.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Deja, A. Uliasz-Bochenczyk, and E. Mokrzycki. 2010. CO2 emissions from Polish cement industry. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 583-588.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Hasanbeig, A. Menke, C. L. Price, 2010. The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1509e1518.Google Scholar
- J.A. Moya, N. Pardo, and A. Mercier. 2011. The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1207-1215Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Schneider, M. Romer, M. Tschudin, and H. Bolio. 2011. Sustainable cement production present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 642-650Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen Li, Zuoren Nie, Suping Cui, Xianzheng Gong, Zhihong Wang, Xiance Meng. 2014. The life cycle inventory study of cement manufacture in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 72, 204-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.048 0959-6526/Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Desrochers. 2008. Did the invisible hand need a regulatory glove to develop a green thumb. Conference on Entrepreneurship, and Innovation – Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, 17–20 June, Copenhagen, Cbs, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Qinghua Zhu and Joseph Sarkis. 2006. An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, Vol. 5 pp.472–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irene Henriques and Perry Sadorsky. 1996. An environmentally responsive firm. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 30, No. 0026, pp.381–395. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0026Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dinesh Seth, R.L. Shrivastava, and Sanjeev Shrivastava. 2016. An empirical investigation of critical success factors and performance measures for green manufacturing in cement industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 1076-1101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2016-0049Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanjeev Shrivastava and R.L. Shrivastava. 2017. A systematic literature review on green manufacturing concepts in cement industries.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management Vol. 34 No.1, pp. 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2014-0028Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ricci, U. 1930. Die “Synthetische Okonomie” von Henry Ludwell Moore. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1: 649–668Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schultz, H. 1930. Der Sin der Statistischen Nachfragen. Veröffentlichungen der Frankfurter. Gesellschaft fur Konjunkturforschung 10. Kurt Schroeder: BonnGoogle Scholar
- Goodwin, RM. 1951. The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles. Econometrica 19: 1–17Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. B. Sweeney and J. Sterman. 2000. Bathtub Dynamics: Initial Results of a Systems Thinking Inventory. Syst. Dyn. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 249–286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Navid Ghaffarzadegan and Amir T. Tajrishi. 2010. Economic transition management in a commodity market: the case of the Iranian cement industry, 26(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.438Google Scholar
- Bert Enserink, Leon Hermans, Pieter Bots, Joop Koppenjan, Jan Kwakkel, and Wil Thissen. 2010. Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems. Eleven International Publishing, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- D. H. Kim. 1992. Guidelines for Drawing Causal Loop Diagrams. Syst. Thinker, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5-6.Google Scholar
- A. D. Basiago. 1999. Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. Environmentalist, vol. 19, pp. 145–161.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Exploring the Variables Interactions for Cement Industry Policies to Support Sustainable Development Aspect in Indonesia through Green Manufacturing
Recommendations
A Sustainable Manufacturing Measurement Model for Indonesian Cement Industry
APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems EngineeringEnvironmental and social issues are critical problems currently being discussed in the world. The United Nations introduced Sustainable Development Global (SDGs). Point 12 of the SDGs states that Companies must consider sustainable production methods as ...
A Study on Green Manufacturing in a Car Battery Manufacturing Plant
This study presents an environmental manufacturing system analysis for companies looking for the benefits of environmental management in achieving high productivity levels. When the relationship between environmental costs and manufacturing decisions is ...
Strategy of Green Logistics and Sustainable Development
ICIII '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering - Volume 01In the 21st century, humanity faces three crises which are population explosion, environmental degradation and shortage of resources. So green Logistics has been drawn greater attention. As an important part of sustainable development, green Logistics ...
Comments