skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468349acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the Variables Interactions for Cement Industry Policies to Support Sustainable Development Aspect in Indonesia through Green Manufacturing

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The cement industry has a crucial role in infrastructure development during an economic growth process, but they are considered a threat to sustainability. It is reflected in the increase and its relationship with high energy consumption and pollution of the environment. Around 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are accounted for by the cement industry alone. The Indonesian government must address this issue by exploring policies that drive producers to implement the green manufacturing principle. This study aims to conceptualize the systemic impact of policies in green manufacturing for the cement industry. The study results are described in diagram of causal loop to build model that would better understand cement industry variables that support Indonesia's sustainable aspects.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Robi Kurniawan and Shunsuke Managi. 2018. Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: an Assesment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54:3, 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1450962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Robert Costanza, Rudolf de Groot, Paul Sutton, Sander van der Ploeg, Sharolyn J. Anderson, Ida Kubiszewski, Stephen Farber, and R. Kerry Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, Volume 26, 152-158, ISSN 0959-3780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zahra Jokar and Alireza Mokhtar. 2018. Policy making in the cement industry for CO2 mitigation on the path way of sustainable development- A system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. G. Olivier and Jeroen A.H.W. Peters. 2020. Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank Zeman. 2009. Oxygen combustion in cement production. Energy Procedia, No. 1, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.sdg2030indonesia.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Volker Hoenig and Robin Harass. Evaluation of the energy performance of cement kilns in the context of co-processing. European Cement Research Academy (ECRA)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. John Pius John. 2017. An Investigation for Energy Sustainability in Cement Industries in Tanzania: The Case of Mbeya Cement. ProQuest Number: 27610402Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. César Valderrama, Ricard Granados, José Luis Cortina, Carles M. Gasol, Manel Guillem, and Alejandro Josa. 2012. Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study. 25(none), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.055Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M.J. Nichola, R. Clift, V. Azapagic, F.C. Walker, and D.E. Porter. 2000. Determination of “Best Available Techniques” for integrated pollution prevention and control: a life cycle approach. Trans. IChemE 78, 193-203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Deja, A. Uliasz-Bochenczyk, and E. Mokrzycki. 2010. CO2 emissions from Polish cement industry. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 583-588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Hasanbeig, A. Menke, C. L. Price, 2010. The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1509e1518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J.A. Moya, N. Pardo, and A. Mercier. 2011. The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1207-1215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Schneider, M. Romer, M. Tschudin, and H. Bolio. 2011. Sustainable cement production present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 642-650Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chen Li, Zuoren Nie, Suping Cui, Xianzheng Gong, Zhihong Wang, Xiance Meng. 2014. The life cycle inventory study of cement manufacture in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 72, 204-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.048 0959-6526/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Desrochers. 2008. Did the invisible hand need a regulatory glove to develop a green thumb. Conference on Entrepreneurship, and Innovation – Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, 17–20 June, Copenhagen, Cbs, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Qinghua Zhu and Joseph Sarkis. 2006. An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, Vol. 5 pp.472–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Irene Henriques and Perry Sadorsky. 1996. An environmentally responsive firm. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 30, No. 0026, pp.381–395. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dinesh Seth, R.L. Shrivastava, and Sanjeev Shrivastava. 2016. An empirical investigation of critical success factors and performance measures for green manufacturing in cement industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 1076-1101. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2016-0049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sanjeev Shrivastava and R.L. Shrivastava. 2017. A systematic literature review on green manufacturing concepts in cement industries.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management Vol. 34 No.1, pp. 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2014-0028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ricci, U. 1930. Die “Synthetische Okonomie” von Henry Ludwell Moore. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1: 649–668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Schultz, H. 1930. Der Sin der Statistischen Nachfragen. Veröffentlichungen der Frankfurter. Gesellschaft fur Konjunkturforschung 10. Kurt Schroeder: BonnGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwin, RM. 1951. The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles. Econometrica 19: 1–17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. L. B. Sweeney and J. Sterman. 2000. Bathtub Dynamics: Initial Results of a Systems Thinking Inventory. Syst. Dyn. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 249–286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Navid Ghaffarzadegan and Amir T. Tajrishi. 2010. Economic transition management in a commodity market: the case of the Iranian cement industry, 26(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.438Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Bert Enserink, Leon Hermans, Pieter Bots, Joop Koppenjan, Jan Kwakkel, and Wil Thissen. 2010. Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems. Eleven International Publishing, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. H. Kim. 1992. Guidelines for Drawing Causal Loop Diagrams. Syst. Thinker, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. D. Basiago. 1999. Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. Environmentalist, vol. 19, pp. 145–161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Variables Interactions for Cement Industry Policies to Support Sustainable Development Aspect in Indonesia through Green Manufacturing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      May 2021
      672 pages
      ISBN:9781450390385
      DOI:10.1145/3468013

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format