skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468636acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Risk Based Creative Design Framework: Integrating Risk Assessment and Design Thinking Approach on Small to Medium Sized Batik Enterprises

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Textile Industries have been one of the most contributing Industries to Indonesia's non-oil and gas exports from Central Java Province. Batik craftsmen are still susceptible to some of the occupational working risks such as Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorder (WMSD) and low back pain. This research aim was to design supportive equipment to reduce the risk of WMSD on batik tulis craftsmen in small and medium enterprises. This research use design thinking which has five steps and integrates risk assessment into empathize, define, and ideate phase. This research's risk assessment was done based on expert judgments from the interview and discussion with batik tulis craftsmen and stakeholders of the industry. Evaluation of 5 experts of work safety and 1 academic for each risk and each work process. Results of the expert's evaluations are processed using the Pareto method and then bow-tie analysis. The ergonomic factor of the tools calculated using the posture evaluation index (PEI). Results of the study showed that the highest risk activities are happening in the putihan, lorot, and soga step therefore designing better gawangan, chair, and plangkan recommended to reduce the risk.

CCS CONCEPTS • Human-Centered Computing • Interaction Design • Interaction design process and method • User centered design

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Agusti, N. 2012. Perancangan Ulang Ruang dan Peralatan Kerja Dengan Pendekatan Ergonomi Bagi Pembatik Tulis Pada Pengrajin Batik Tulis X. Theses. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2018. Manajemen risiko – Pedoman. SNI 8616:2018 ISO 31000:2018. ICS 03.100.01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, T. and Wyatt, J. (2010) Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 30–5. Available at http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_ for_social_innovation?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium= twitter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clean Batik Initiative Centre, “Bahan Kimia Berbahaya dalam Pembuatan Batik”, (Dangerous Chemicals in the Making of Batik), German-Indonesia Chamber of Industry and Commerce, (2011), http://cleanbatik.com/index.php?id=207Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clean Batik Initiative Centre, “Pedoman Penanganan Zat-zat Kimia, Tindakan Pencegahan dan Pertolongan Pertama”, (Guidelines for Handling Chemical Substances, First Precautions and First Aid), German-Indonesia Chamber of Industry and Commerce, (2011), http://cleanbatik.com/index.php?id=211Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clean Batik Initiative Centre, “Ho-2 Proses Pembuatan Batik”, (Ho-2 Batik Making Process), German-Indonesia Chamber of Industry and Commerce, (2011), http://cleanbatik.com/index.php?id=207Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Interaction Design Foundation. (2020). 5 stages in the design thinking process. https:// www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process Accessed 19 February 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ismail, T., Wiyantoro, L. S., & Muchlish, M. (2012). Strategy, interactive control system and national culture: a case study of Batik Industry in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 33-38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2016. Modul Bahan Ajar Cetak Farmasi. Pusdik SDM Kesehatan Badan Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan. Sri Rejeki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Hasil Utama RISKESDAS 2018. https://kesmas.kemkes.go.id/assets/upload/dir_519d41d8cd98f00/files/Hasil-riskesdas-2018_1274.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of product innovation management, 32(6), 925-938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations management, 21(2), 193-203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Owen, C. (2007) Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Risk Management Standard AS/NZS 4360 (1999) Risk Management Standard AS/NZS 4360, Standards Association of Australia, Sydney.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. SK Menperin, Surat Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian Indonesia No.19/M/I/1986 Industry Classification, Ministry of Industry Republic of Indonesia, (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sunder M, V., Mahalingam, S., & Krishna M, S. N. (2020). Improving patients’ satisfaction in a mobile hospital using lean six sigma–a design-thinking intervention. Production Planning & Control, 31(6), 512-526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Indonesian Batik, https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/indonesian-batik-00170 accessed on 5 April 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. World Health Organisation Scientific Group. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Geneva: WHO; 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zheng, D.L. (2018). Design thinking is abidextrous. Management Decision, 56, 736-756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format