Alprianto Zainuddin
ABSTRACT
The selection of an EPC Contractor in Procurement for Indonesia's electricity system faces several challenges, especially for strategic projects such as transmission and substations. The procurement of goods/services in the electricity sector considers several evaluation criteria such as technical experience, administrative requirements, prices, and how the provider has met the applicable provisions in Indonesia. This research aimed to design a conceptual model to determine the EPC Tender Process Criteria for Electricity Construction by using an experimental design approach to measure the value of the 4 (four) main criteria used in the evaluation and actual implementation of EPC contractors. This conceptual model included stakeholders involved as executors of tenders or policy-makers directly related to achieving organizational goals. The data processing method used the Multicriteria decision-making method (MCDM) such as the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the Promethee Method.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Vidia, E., Perancangan Model Pemilihan Kontraktor Proyek Kontruksi Di Kelompok Kerja Unit Layanan Pengadaan Kabupaten Tulungagung. 2016, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.Google Scholar
- Watt, D., B. Kayis, and K. Willey, Identifying key factors in the evaluation of tenders for projects and services. International Journal of Project Management, 2009. 27(3): p. 250-260.Google Scholar
- Dachyar, M. and G.A. Sijabat. Designing Model of Spare Parts Supplier Selection in Power Plants Using AHP-PROMETHEE Method. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 2019.Google Scholar
- Hanane, A., O. Brahim, and F. Bouchra. An ANP-PROMETHEE model for supplier selection and a case study. in 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM). 2015. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cengiz, A., , A multi-criteria decision model for construction material supplier selection. Procedia Engineering, 2017. 196: p. 294-301.Google Scholar
- Watt, D., B. Kayis, and K. Willey, The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. International journal of project management, 2010. 28(1): p. 51-60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hosseini Nasab, H. and M. Mirghani Ghamsarian, A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making model for contractor prequalification. Journal of Decision Systems, 2015. 24(4): p. 433-448.Google Scholar
- Micheli, G.J. and E. Cagno, The role of procurement in performance deviation recovery in large EPC projects. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 2016. 8: p. 1847979016675302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zala, M.I. and R.B. Bhatt. An approach of contractor selection by Analytical Hieirarchy Process. in National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology, 13th-14th May. 2011.Google Scholar
- Banaitiene, N. and A. Banaitis, Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2006. 12(4): p. 276-282.Google Scholar
- Topcu, Y.I., A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and environment, 2004. 39(4): p. 469-481.Google Scholar
- El-Sawalhi, N., D. Eaton, and R. Rustom, Contractor pre-qualification model: State-of-the-art. International journal of project management, 2007. 25(5): p. 465-474.Google ScholarCross Ref
- El Wardani, M.A., J.I. Messner, and M.J. Horman, Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 2006. 132(3): p. 230-238.Google Scholar
- Alptekin, O. and N. Alptekin. Analysis of criteria influencing contractor selection using TOPSIS method. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2017. IOP Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Singh, D. and R.L. Tiong, A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection. Journal of construction engineering and management, 2005. 131(1): p. 62-70.Google Scholar
- Mahdi, I.M., , A multi‐criteria approach to contractor selection. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 2002.Google Scholar
- Hatush, Z. and M. Skitmore, Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: an additive model. Building and environment, 1998. 33(2-3): p. 105-115.Google Scholar
- Ang, G., M. Groosman, and N. PM Scholten, Dutch performance-based approach to building regulations and public procurement. Building Research & Information, 2005. 33(2): p. 107-119.Google Scholar
- Pongpeng, J. and J. Liston, TenSeM: a multicriteria and multidecision-makers' model in tender evaluation. Construction Management & Economics, 2003. 21(1): p. 21-30.Google Scholar
- Widodo, B.E. and U. Ciptomulyono, PEMILIHAN KONTRAKTOR UNTUK JASA KONSTRUKSI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP STUDI KASUS DI PROYEK PLN SELECTION OF CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BY USING AHP CASE STUDY IN PROJECT PLN.Google Scholar
- Kusuma, D.A., Model Penilaian Kontraktor Pada Proyek Ketenagalistrikan Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Fuzzy TOPSIS. 2017, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.Google Scholar
- van der Meer, J., , Multi-criteria decision analysis and quality of design decisions in infrastructure tenders: a contractor's perspective. Construction management and economics, 2020. 38(2): p. 172-188.Google Scholar
- Chai, J., J.N. Liu, and E.W. Ngai, Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert systems with applications, 2013. 40(10): p. 3872-3885.Google Scholar
- Aguezzoul, A., Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods. Omega, 2014. 49: p. 69-78.Google Scholar
- Waris, M., , An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for sustainable procurement of construction equipment: Multicriteria-based decision framework for Malaysia. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019. 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fong, P.S.-W. and S.K.-Y. Choi, Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction management and economics, 2000. 18(5): p. 547-557.Google Scholar
- Pangaribuan, P. and A. Beniyanto. SAW, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE Method as a Comparison Method in Measuring Procurement of Goods and Services Auction System. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. IOP Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheng, E.W. and H. Li, Contractor selection using the analytic network process. Construction management and Economics, 2004. 22(10): p. 1021-1032.Google Scholar
- Aulia, R.E., Analisis Proses Pelaksanaan Lelang Pada Pemilihan Pelaksana Proyek Dengan Metode Ahp Dan Promethee (Studi Kasus: PT PJB UP CIRATA). 2015, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.Google Scholar
- Dotoli, M., N. Epicoco, and M. Falagario, Multi-Criteria Decision Making techniques for the management of public procurement tenders: A case study. Applied Soft Computing, 2020. 88: p. 106064.Google Scholar
- Saad, S.M., N. Kunhu, and A.M. Mohamed, A fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decision-making model for procurement process. International journal of logistics systems and management, 2016. 23(1): p. 1-24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Afolayan, A.H., B.A. Ojokoh, and A.O. Adetunmbi, Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection. Scientific African, 2020. 9: p. e00471.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zavadskas, E.K., Z. Turskis, and J. Tamošaitiene, Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2008. 9(3): p. 181-187.Google Scholar
- Mimović, P. and A. Krstić, Application of multi-criteria analysis in the public procurement process optimization. Economic Themes, 2016. 54(1): p. 103-128.Google Scholar
- Zavadskas, E.K., , Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW‐G and TOPSIS grey techniques. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2010. 11(1): p. 34-55.Google Scholar
- Colin, A. and J. Andrew, Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev, 2013. 47(1): p. 79-86.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A Conceptual Model for Contractor Assessment System in the Electricity Project with Tender
Recommendations
Procurement Auctions for Differentiated Goods
We consider two mechanisms to procure differentiated goods: a sealed-bid buyer-determined auction and a dynamic-bid price-based auction with bidding credits. The sealed-bid buyer-determined auction is analogous to the “request for quote” procedure ...
Budget Feasible Procurement Auctions
We consider a simple and well-studied model for procurement problems and solve it to optimality. A buyer with a fixed budget wants to procure, from a set of available workers, a budget feasible subset that maximizes her utility: Any worker has a private ...
Improving Successful A+B Procurement Auctions with Negotiations
HICSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesIn A+B procurement auctions the buyer's utility is linear and the bidders' utility is assumed to be quasi-linear. If this assumption is met, then a successful auction may conclude with an efficient winning bid which maximizes both the buyer's utility ...
Comments