Gerardo R. Jodi
ABSTRACT
∗Occupational accidents and diseases are directly related to reduced work capacity, premature retirement, or death. Even-though many occupational safety and health management systems (OSHMS) have proven to be effective under controlled conditions, their implementation in practice is often complicated. It may not work as expected, primarily when referring to office–based workplaces. The present study aims to develop a conceptual model to understand better system variables’ interconnection based on multi-actor perspectives. The related stakeholders are the leading policymakers and OSH actors directly connected with the organization's goal. A conceptual model would help further develop this study with a quantitative model to measure the impacts of various scenarios for improvement.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- I. I. Ibrahim, S. M. Noor, N. Nasirun, and Z. Ahmad, “Safety in the office: Does it matter to the staff?”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 730–740, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.076.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- P. N. Zivich, A. S. Gancz, and A. E. Aiello, “Effect of hand hygiene on infectious diseases in the office workplace: A systematic review”, American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 46, pp. 448–455, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Minister Regulation Number 48 of 2016. (2016, Sept. 28). Occupational Safety And Health Standards. [Online]. Available:http://kesjaor.kemkes.go.id/documents/ PMK_No._48_ttg_Standar_Keselamatan_dan_Kesehatan_Kerja_Perkantoran_.pdf.Google Scholar
- Y. Latief, A. Suraji, L. Sagita, and R. A. Machfudiyanto, “Identification of Stakeholders to Establishing Construction Safety Culture in Indonesia”, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 258 (02005), pp. 1–4, 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201925802005.Google Scholar
- O. A. W. T. Van de Riet, “Policy analysis in a multi-actor policy settings: Navigating between negotiated nonsense & superfluous knowledge”, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty Technology Policy and Management, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, Netherlands, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c406a7ca-e15a-4b62-b5c7-bc64a05fcac6.Google Scholar
- B. Enserink, L. Hermans, J. Kwakkel, W. Thissen, J. Koppenjan, and P. Bots, Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems. The Hague, Netherlands: Lemma, 2010.Google Scholar
- L. M. Hermans, A. C. Naber, and B. Enserink, “An approach to design long-term monitoring and evaluation frameworks in multi-actor systems—A case in water management”, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 35, pp. 427–438, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.01.006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. I. J. M. Zwetsloot, “Developments and debates on OHSM system standardisation and certification”, in Systematic Occupational Safety & Health Management: Perspectives on an International Development, K. Frick, P. L. Jensen, M. Quinlan, and T. Wilthagen, Eds. Oxford, UK: Pergamon-Elsevier, pp. 391–412, 2000.Google Scholar
- L. S. Robson, J. A. Clarke, K. Cullen, A. Bielecky, C. Severin, P. L. Bigelow, E. Irvin, A. Culyer, and Q. Mahood, “The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review”, Safety Science, vol. 45, pp. 329–353, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Gallagher, E. Underhill, and M. Rimmer, “Occupational safety and health management systems in Australia: barriers to success”, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, vol. 1 (2), pp. 67–81, 2003, doi: 10.1080/14774003.2003.11667637.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Mohammadfam, M. Kamalinia, M. Momeni, R. Golmohammadi, Y. Hamidi, and A. Soltanian, “Evaluation of the quality of occupational health and safety management systems based on key performance indicators in certified organizations”, Safety and Health at Work, vol. 8, pp. 156–161, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.09.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Podgórski, “Measuring operational performance of OSH management system – A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators”, Safety Science, vol. 73, pp. 146–166, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Sklad, “Assessing the impact of processes on the Occupational Safety and Health Management System's effectiveness using the fuzzy cognitive maps approach”, Safety Science, vol. 117, pp. 71–80, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Benders, H. Doorewaard, and E. Poutsma, “Modern socio-technology: Set by De Sitter”, in Work Teams: Past, Present, and Future, M. M. Beyerlein, Eds. Dordrecht, NLD: Springer, pp. 169–180, 2000, doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. P. M. Veeke, G. Lodewijks, and J. A. Ottjes, The Delft Systems Approach: Analysis and Design of Industrial Systems. Dordrecht, NLD: Springer, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-177-0.Google Scholar
- P. Carayon, “The balance theory and the work system model …twenty years later”, Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 25 (5), pp. 313–327, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10447310902864928.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Pasmore, S. Winby, S. A. Mohrman, and R. Vanasse, “Reflections: Sociotechnical systems design and organization change”, Journal of Change Management, vol. 19 (2), pp. 67–85, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14697017.2018.1553761.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Rasmussen, “Human factors in a dynamic information society: where are we heading?”, Ergonomics, vol. 43 (7), pp. 869–879, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Borys, “Seeing the Wood from the Trees: A systems approach to OH&S management”, in Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems: Proceedings of the First National Conference, Sydney, Australia, pp. 151–172, 2000.Google Scholar
- A. Rizzo, A. Pasquini, P. Nucci, and S. Bagnara, “SHELFS: Managing critical issues through experience feedback”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol. 10 (1), pp. 83–98, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Leveson, Engineering a Safer World. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. M. Kleiner, L. J. Hettinger, D. M. DeJoy, Y. H. Huang, and P. E. D. Love, “Sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe work systems”, Ergonomics, vol. 58 (4), pp. 635–649, 2015, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(200024)10:1<83::AID-HFM5>3.0.CO;2-D.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. K. Markkanen, “Occupational Safety and Health in Indonesia”, Philippines, ILO Subregional Office for South-East Asia and The Pasific, Working Paper 9, April 2004. Accessed: Jan 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ilo.int/ wcmsp5/groups/public/—asia/—ro-bangkok/ —ilo-manila/documents/ publication/wcms_126058.pdf.Google Scholar
- Y. Mahendradhata, L. Trisnantoro, S. Listyadewi, P. Soewondo, T. Marthias, P. Harimurti, and J. Prawira, The Republic of Indonesia Health System Review in Health Systems in Transition, vol. 7, No.1. New Delhi, India: Asia Pacific Observatory, 2017.Google Scholar
- ILO, Actuarial study on the reform of the Indonesian BPJS Ketenagakerjaan: technical report. Jakarta: ILO, 2017. Accessed: Dec. 5, 2020. [Online]. Available:https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—asia/—ro-bangkok/—ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/ wcms_571382.pdf.Google Scholar
- S. Hakro and L. Jinshan, “Workplace employees’ annual physical checkup and during hire on the job to increase health-care awareness perception to prevent disease risk: A work for policy implementable option globally”, Safety and Health at Work, vol. 10, pp. 132–140, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.08.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Pawlowska, “Using lagging and leading indicators for the evaluation of occupational safety and health performance in industry”, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 21 (3), pp. 284–290, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081769.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Becker, A. Becker, and W. Salabun, “Construction and use of the ANP decision model taking into account the experts'competence”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 112, pp. 2269–2279, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.145.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Hopkins, “A Corporate Dilemma: To be a Learning Organisation or to Minimise Liability,” Journal of Occupational Health and Safety: Australia and New Zealand, vol. 22 (3), pp. 251–259, 2006.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Conceptual Model of Occupational Safety and Health Management System in Office-Based Workplace
Recommendations
Designing for Workplace Safety: Exploring Interactive Textiles as Personal Alert Systems
TEI '20: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionDespite various safety regulations and procedures, work accidents remain a significant problem in the global process industry and the Swedish steel industry. To address personal safety and safety culture, wearable alert systems were prototyped and ...
Wearable technology as a solution for workplace safety
MUM '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous MultimediaOccupational accidents cause physical harm to impacted employees and financial harm to employers. The most effective protection against occupational accidents is the proper usage of personal protective equipment (PPE). A huge variety of wearable sensors ...
Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Applications and A System Planning Model
AbstractOccupational health and safety management systems that can be audited sustainably have been started to be required both in our country and in the world, due to work accidents in recent years. The goal of these management systems are to ensure ...
Comments