skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468644acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crude Oil Production Recovery Strategies for Upstream Sectors on Offshore Indonesia: A Conceptual Model

Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crude oil is one of Indonesia's most significant revenue from its export. However, crude oil is also a burden in import spending to fulfill the high demand for its derivative product, fuel oil. This issue is driven by the decline of crude oil production and sluggish upstream activities to replace the depleted oil reserves, which are also affected by low crude oil prices in the market. The upstream oil activities such as exploration and exploitation mostly operated on onshore instead of offshore, so the offshore’ undeveloped oil reserves are still vast and promising. Therefore, there is an urgency to set the crude oil production recovery strategies by focusing on the offshore upstream sector. However, the offshore upstream macro processes are complex and dynamic, need a holistic view to understand their structure, causal relationship, and behavior over time. This study proposes a conceptual model based on the System Dynamics approach to comprehend those dynamic complexities. It will be modeled through one of the biggest and oldest offshore oil companies in Indonesia as a representative to produce the strategies. The conceptual model shows that the exploration sectors should be more prioritized to ensure the sustainability of exploitation activities and crude oil production recovery in the future.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Secretariat General of National Energy Council. Indonesia Energy Outlook 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2021 from https://www.esdm.go.id/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Richard Dutu. 2016. Challenges and Policies in Indonesia's Energy Sector. Energy Policy 98 (Nov. 2016), 513–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mahmood Shafiee, Isaac Animah, Babakalli Alkali, and David Baglee. 2018. Decision support methods and applications in the upstream oil and gas sector. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 173 (Feb. 2019), 1173-1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.050Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Special Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Activities of Indonesia. Annual Report 2019: Increase Investment Towards 1 Million BOPD Production. Retrieved October 20, 2020 from https://www.skkmigas.go.id/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. I Ketut Gunarta and F. A. Putri. 2018. Valuating Indonesian upstream oil management scenario through system dynamics modelling. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 337 (2018), 012045. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/337/1/012045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Shashi Shekhar Prasad Singh, Jatin R. Agarwal, and Nag Mani. 2019. Offshore Operations and Engineering (1st. ed.). Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Erdina Arianti and Abd Ghofur. 2019. Decommissioning Technology of Post-Operational Fixed Offshore Platform. Inovtek Polbeng 9, 2 (Nov. 2019), 271. DOI: 10.35314/ip.v9i2.1040.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Muhammad Imran Khan. 2016. Falling Oil Prices: Causes, Consequences and Policy Implication. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 149 (Jan. 2017), 409-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.048Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanjib Chowduri and K. C. Sahu. 1992. A system dynamics model for the Indian oil and gas exploration/exploitation industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 42, 1 (Aug. 1992), 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(92)90073-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jay W. Forester. 1994. System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review. 10, 2-3 (1994), 245-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Wight, H. Friestad, I. Anderson, P. Wicaksono and C. H. Reminton. 1997. Exploration history of the offshore Southeast Sumatra PSC, Java Sea, Indonesia. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 126 (1997), 121-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1997.126.01.10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. James W. Amyx, Daniel M. Bass Jr, Robert L. Whiting. 1960. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering Physical Properties. McGraw-Hill Book Company, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jon Gluyas and Richard Swarbick. 2004. Petroleum Geoscience. Blackwell Science Ltd, Maiden, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ahmad Abdul Azizurrofi and Dian Permatasari Mashari. 2018. Designing Oil and Gas Exploration Strategy for The Future National Energy Sustainability Based on Statistical Analysis of Commercial Reserves and Production Cost in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Energy 1, 1 (Feb. 2018), 66-81. DOI: 10.33116/ije.v1i1.14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. William L. Lahey and Thomas L. Leschine. 1983. Evaluating the risk of offshore oil development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 4, 3-4 (Dec. 1983), 271-286. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(83)80040-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alphonsus Fagan. 1991. An Introduction to the Petroleum Industry. Department of Mines and Energy, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Key Changes from the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS 2007) to the PRMS 2018. Retrieved November 14, 2020 from https://www.spe.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tarek Ahmed and Paul D. McKinney. 2005. Advance Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier Inc, Burlington, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Havard Devold. 2006. Oil and Gas Production Handbook: An introduction to oil and gas production. ABB ATPA Oil and Gas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Behdad Kiani, Saeed Mirzamohammadi, and Seyed Hossein Hosseini. 2010. A Survey on the Role of System Dynamics Methodology on Fossil Fuel Resources Analysis. International Business Research 3, 3 (Jul. 2010). DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v3n3p84Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ukauku Ikwan, Wumi Iledare, Joseph Ajienka, and Adewale Dosunmu. 2018. System Dynamic Modelling for Forecasting Crude Oil Reserves and Production Capacity: A Case Study of Nigeria. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition SPE-193463-MS (Aug. 2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/193463-MS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jianzhong Xiao, Jinhua Cheng, Jun Shen, and Xiaolin Wang. 2017. A System Dynamics Analysis of Investment, Technology and Policy that Affect Natural Gas Exploration and Exploitation in China. Energies 10, 2 (Jan. 2017), 154. DOI: 10.3390/en10020154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andranik S. Akopov. 2012. Designing of Integrated System-Dynamics Models for an Oil Company. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 45, 4 (Dec. 2012), 220-230. DOI: 10.1504/IJCAT.2012.051122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mohammadhussein Rafieisakhaei and Babak Barazandeh. 2017. A System Dynamics Approach on Oil Market Modeling with Statistical Data Analysis. SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference SPE-184040-MS (Mar. 2017). DOI: 10.2118/184040-MSGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. John D. Sterman. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw Hill Higher Education, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Donella H. Meadows. 2008. Thinking in systems. Earthscan, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bert Enserink, Leon Hermans, Pieter Bots, Joop Koppenjan, Jan Kwakkel, and Wil Thissen. 2010. Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems. Eleven International Publishing, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wil A. H. Thissen and Warren E. Walker. 2013. Public Policy Analysis: New Development. Springer, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Crude Oil Production Recovery Strategies for Upstream Sectors on Offshore Indonesia: A Conceptual Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
      May 2021
      672 pages
      ISBN:9781450390385
      DOI:10.1145/3468013

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format