Ryanda G. Away
ABSTRACT
The transportation demand in urban areas is driven by high mobility needs. However, in urban areas such as Jakarta, people propensity to use private transportation rather than public transportation even though modern public transportation is available. Consequently, the continued increase in the modal share of private vehicles was a matter of concern in the context of public transport services and the number of users. This paper wants to address this concern holistically by using the system dynamics approach. System dynamics is being used to developing a conceptual model of the dynamic complexity in Jakarta's transportation sector. By capturing the elements involved in the transportation system, this study also aims to capture key factors that may play significant roles in increasing services and the number of users. Such a holistic view could provide insights for possible effective measures that the government can take. The system diagram revealed the system's key components and stakeholders that involved in the transportation system in Jakarta. The Improvement of accessibility facilities and travel restrictions for private transport users is key points that need to be addressed properly to develop policy.
Actor
Responsibility
Problem Perception
Objectives
Sources of program funding
Feasibility of funding program
Funding allocation for propper program
Ministry of Environment and Forestry
Healthy living environment
High growth rate of private vehicle users
Emission reduction
National Police
Traffic control
High growth rate of private vehicle users
Reducing traffic accident & congestion
- “Indonesia Population Projection 2010-2035”. BPS, BAPPENAS & UNFPA. [Online]. Available https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/10/19/78d24d9020026ad95c6b5965/proyeksi-penduduk-indonesia-2015-2045-hasil-supas-2015.html. [Accessed February 2021].Google Scholar
- “Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis Kendaraan (unit) di Provinsi DKI Jakarta”. Badan Pusat Statistik DKI Jakarta. [Online]. Available:https://jakarta.bps.go.id/indicator/17/786/1/jumlah-kendaraan-bermotor-menurut-jenis-kendaraan-unit-di-provinsi-dki-jakarta.html. [Accessed February 2021].Google Scholar
- “Rencana Induk Transportasi Jabodetabek (RITJ)”. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perhubungan. [Online]. Available https://ppid.dephub.go.id/fileupload/informasi-berkala/laporan_RITJ.pdf. [Accessed February 2021].Google Scholar
- Anable, J. 2005. ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying Travel Behaviour Segments Using Attitude Theory. Transport Policy, 12(1), 65–78. doi:10.1016/jtranpol.2004.11.004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anable, J., & Gatersleben, B. 2005. All Works and No Play? The Roles of Instrumental and Affective Factors in Work and Leisure Journeys by Different Travel Modes. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 163–181. doi:10.1016/jtra.2004.09.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bajracharya, A., 2016. Public transportation and private car: a system dynamics approach in understanding the mode choice. Int. J. Syst. Dyn. Appl. 5 (2), 1e18. doi: 10.4018/IJSDA.2016040101.Google Scholar
- Beirao, G., & Cabral, J. A. S. 2007. Understanding Attitudes Towards Public Transport and Private Car: A Qualitative Study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478–489. doi:10.1016/jtranpol.2007.04.009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dargey, J. M. 2001. The Effect of Income on Car Ownership: Evidence of Asymmetry. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, 35(9), 807–821. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00018-5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. 2012. Performance Indicators for an Objective Measure of Public Transport Service Quality. European Transport, 51(3), 1825–3997.Google Scholar
- Hagman, O., 2003. Mobilizing meanings of mobility: car users’ constructions of the goods and bads of car use. Transportation Research Part D 8 (1), 1–9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Garling, T., 2002. Effects of economic disincentives on private car use. Transportation 29 (4), 349–370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jensen, M., 1999. Passion and heart in transport—a sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transport Policy 6 (1), 19–33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lai, W. T., & Chen, C. F. 2011. Behavioural Intentions of Public Transit Passengers – The Roles of Service Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318–325. doi:10.1016/j. tranpol.2010.09.003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Segment Sterman, J., 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Steg, L. 2005. Car Use: Lust and Must. Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Motives for Car Use. Transportation Research, 39(2), 147–162. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001.Google Scholar
- Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Slotegraaf, G. 2001. Instrumental-Reasoned and Symbolic-Affective Motives for using a Motor Car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4(3), 151–169. doi:10.1016/ S1369-8478(01)00020-1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- STIMULUS 1999. Segmentation for transport in markets using latent user psychological structures. Transport Research Fourth Framework Programme, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Who Are the Users of Digital Public Services?: A Critical Reflection on Differences in the Treatment of Citizens as ‘Users’ in e-government Research
Electronic ParticipationAbstractDespite the importance of citizens as users of digital public services, e-government research has not explicitly considered different perspectives on citizens as users of said services. This paper sets out to explore the possible variations in ...
Public and municipal services register: a back office system for one stop shop e-services portal in Russian federation
dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging TimesPublic and Municipal Services Register (PMSR) is a Master Data Management System which implements specific business rules for more than 480 Russian public services. Through PMSR public services description and implementation is provided by all federal ...
The Internet Users’ Opinions on Public E-Services: Empirical Analysis
ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernancePublic services are one of the most dynamically developing areas of the state's functioning, which is confirmed by the systematically increasing number of e-services and their users in individual countries. For more than 25 years, Poland has been ...
Comments