skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468660acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feasibility Study of Biomass Power Generation System Using Comparison Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Waste treatment becomes one of the world's concentrations for improving sustainability in the energy sector in both developed and developing countries. Indonesia is one of the developing countries that conduct waste management for becoming a country with a sustainable environment. Waste management is a very important implementation system for upcoming on the excess supply of waste. Population growth is one of the factors that cause an increased supply of waste in some cities in Indonesia. Therefore to give a good impact, waste management needs to be done by local government or municipal governments. In its implementation, the governor established a policy to select the technology to manage waste by appropriate methods to determine the technology. Waste projection of Pematangsiantar City about 42,608,487 kg per year is used as base data in case study management of waste that will be formulated on the biomass power generation. This study, implementing comparison methods on the assessment of appropriate technology to solve the waste problem of the city using better technology. The selected waste treatment technology in this study are incinerator, pyrolysis, and anaerobic biodigester technology. The results show that the technology of anaerobic biodigester is feasibly applied based on the value of payback period (PP) for 4.1 years, average rate return (ARR) for 3.08%, and average produces the lowest carbon dioxide in 1,273.48 Gg per years.

References

  1. S. Safril,  F. Sumasto, M. Wirandi, and F. Imansuri, “Simulation of generate value for development of biomass plants in Indonesia: a feasibility study Simulation of generate value for development of biomass plants in Indonesia: a feasibility study,” 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/885/1/012026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. A. S. Abd Kadir, C. Y. Yin, M. Rosli Sulaiman, X. Chen, and M. El-Harbawi, “Incineration of municipal solid waste in Malaysia: Salient issues, policies and waste-to-energy initiatives,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 24, pp. 181–186, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Avinash A. Patil, Balasaheb B. Patil, and Amol A. Kulkarni, “Waste To Energy By Incineration,” J. Comput. Technol., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 2278 – 3814, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Buonanno and L. Morawska, “Ultrafine particle emission of waste incinerators and comparison to the exposure of urban citizens,” Waste Manag., vol. 37, pp. 75–81, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. M. Huang, W. F. Yang, H. W. Ma, and Y. R. Song, “The potential of recycling and reusing municipal solid waste incinerator ash in Taiwan,” Waste Manag., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 979–987, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Larrain , “Economic performance of pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste: Open-loop versus closed-loop recycling,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 270, p. 122442, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Miandad, M. A. Barakat, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. Rehan, and A. S. Nizami, “Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste: A review,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 102, pp. 822–838, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Elkhalifa, T. Al-Ansari, H. R. Mackey, and G. McKay, “Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 144, no. January, pp. 310–320, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. M. Mahmudul, M. G. Rasul, D. Akbar, R. Narayanan, and M. Mofijur, “A comprehensive review of the recent development and challenges of a solar-assisted biodigester system,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 753, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. O. W. Awe, Y. Zhao, A. Nzihou, D. P. Minh, and N. Lyczko, “A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 267–283, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. M. Sianturi, “Evaluasi Terhadap Pengelolaan Sampah Dalam,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 240–254, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. N. Kinyua, J. Zhang, F. Camacho-Céspedes, A. Tejada-Martinez, and S. J. Ergas, “Use of physical and biological process models to understand the performance of tubular anaerobic digesters,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 107, pp. 35–44, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2015.11.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S.Safril, B. Suyitno, and S. Harahap, “Desain Dan Eksperimen Biodigester Anaerobik Sampah Organik Sebagai Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Sampah (Pltsa) Di Kabupaten Tegal,” Teknobiz.Univpancasila.Ac.Id, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 115–120, [Online]. Available: http://teknobiz.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/12345/article/view/163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Safril, “Optimasi Desain Kombinasi Agitator pada Anaerobic Buffled Reactor Biomass,” JTERA (Jurnal Teknol. Rekayasa), vol. 4, no. 1, p. 125, 2019, doi: 10.31544/jtera.v4.i1.2019.125-130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. D. Nixon, D. G. Wright, P. K. Dey, S. K. Ghosh, and P. A. Davies, “A comparison assessment of waste incinerators in the UK,” Waste Manag., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2234–2244, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. D. Anuar Sharuddin, F. Abnisa, W. M. A. Wan Daud, and M. K. Aroua, “A review on pyrolysis of plastic wastes,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 115, pp. 308–326, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. I. Ahmad , “Pyrolysis study of polypropylene and polyethylene into premium oil products,” Int. J. Green Energy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 663–671, 2015, doi: 10.1080/15435075.2014.880146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format