skip to main content
10.1145/3468013.3468671acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapcoriseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IoT Learning for Electrical Engineering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Abstract—The primary aim of this Paper is to outline results and to summarize research findings on IoT learning that increase learning opportunities and give more positive impact to Electrical Engineering education especially on machines and sensor in physical object communicating with each other. IoT learning tries to enhance the learning patterns variety or how the ways people access and manage information to acquire knowledge by using smart technology which in our case is a NodeMCU and Arduino. The successful experiences build confidence to open wider subject of innovations in education 4.0 as it is discussed in the paper. It is expected that the current results motivate and support the running electronics and telematics education to be optimized in reliability and effectiveness by using more structure and direct approach in digital learning technology.

References

  1. S. Chong, G. T. Pan, J. Chin, P. L. Show, T. C. K. Yangand C. M. Huang,Integration of 3D Printing and Industry 4.0 into Engineering Teaching, MDPI Journal Sustainability, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Nagy, J. Oláh, E. Erdei, D. Máté and J. Popp, The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain. MDPI Journal Sustainability, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. A. Basset, G. Manogaran, M. Mohamed and E. Rushdy, Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision-making process, Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Bayani, M. Loaiza and K. Leiton, Internet of Things (IoT) Advantages on E-Learning in The Smart Cities, International Journal of Development Research, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Porkodi and B. Velumani, The Internet of Things (IoT) Applications and Communication Enabling Technology Standards: An Overview, International Conference on Intelligence Computing Applications, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Poudel, Internet of Things: Underlying Technologies,Interoperability, and Threats to Privacy and Security, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Hozdić, Smart factory for industry 4.0: A review, International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Wang, D. Li, J. Wan and C. Zhang, Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. G. Paronda, An Exploratory Study on Uber, GrabCar, and Conventional Taxis in Metro, Sustainable Built Design, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Ijaz, M. Grau, L. Zhang and A. Mohamed, Enabling Massive IoT in 5G and beyond Systems: PHY Radio Frame Design Considerations, IEEE Access, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. M. Müller, D. Kiel and K. I. Voigt, What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability, Sustainable Built Design, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. S. Jalali, J. P. Kaiser, M. Siegel, and S. Madnick, The Internet of Things (IoT) Promises New Benefits And Risks: A Systematic Analysis of Adoption Dynamics of IoT Products, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hezron and B. Bitzer, Web-based learning for power engineering, 42nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Bitzer and Hezron, Applications of web-based learning for power engineering in the world, 44th International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Bitzer and Hezron, E-Learning for Power Systems, 5th International Conference on Deregulated Electricity Market issues in South-Eastern Europe, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K. Umachandran, I. Jurcic, D. F. James, M. M. T. Said and A. A. Rashid, Gearing up education towards Industry 4.0, International Journal of Computers and Technology, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. L. S. Dalenogare, G. B. Benitez, N. F. Ayala and A. G. Frank, The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. G. Antunes, A. Pinto, P. Reis and C. Henriques, Industry 4.0: a challenge of competition, DOI: 10.29352/mill0206.08.0015, 2018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. K. D. Pramanik, S. Pal and P. Choudhury, Beyond Automation: The Cognitive IoT. Artificial Intelligence Brings Sense to the Internet of Things, Cognitive Computing for Big Data Systems Over IoT, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. O. Vermesan and P. Friess, Internet of Things Applications - From Research and Innovation to Market Deployment, River Publishers Series in Communication, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Suciu, G. Todoran, A. Vulpe, V. Suciu, C. Butca and R. Cheveresan, Cloud Computing and Validated Learning for Accelerating Innovation in IoT, International Conference E-Learning, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. V. Nedeva and S. Dineva, New learning innovations with Web 4.0, International Conference on Virtual Learning, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Moubaiddin, N. Obeid and F. Shawarbeh ,Using Intelligence Agents in e-Learning, International Journal on Information, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. M. Iqbal, M. Farhan, S. Jabbar, Y. Saleem and S. Khalid, Multimedia based IoT-centric smart framework for eLearning paradigm, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Al-Khannak, B. Bitzer and Hezron, Grid computing by using multi agent system technology in distributed power generator, 42nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. M. A. E. Khaddar and M. Boulmalf, Smartphone: The Ultimate IoT and IoE Device,Smartphones from an Applied Research Perspective, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Kamilaris and A. Pitsillides, Mobile Phone Computing and the Internet of Things: A Survey, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. Aldowah1, S. U. Rehman, S. Ghazal and I. N. Umar, Internet of Things in Higher Education: A Study on Future Learning, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. T. Oliveira, M. Thomas and M. Espadanal, Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors, Journal Information and Management Elsevier, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. A. Fernández, D. Peralta, F. Herrera and J. M. Benítez, An Overview of E-Learning in Cloud Computing, Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (LTEC'12), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. F. Almeida, Concept and Dimensions of Web 4.0, International Journal of Computers and Technology, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. H. Mäenpää, S. Tarkoma, S. Varjonen and A. Vihavainen, Blending Problem- and Project-Based Learning in Internet of Things Education: Case Greenhouse Maintenance, 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. K. Harish, D. Megha, M. Shuklambari, K. Amit and C. K. Jambotkar, Pick and Place Robotic Arm Using Arduino, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR), 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Outseal, Buku Instruksi Outseal PLC 1.0.1, http://www.outseal.com/web/data/uploads/download/Buku%20Istruksi%20Outseal%20Studio%20Versi%201_0_1.pdf, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. N. Zlatanov, Arduino and Open Source Computer Hardware and Software, IEEE Computer Society, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. E. Park, A. P. d. Pobil, and S. J. Kwon, The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Cities: Technology Roadmap-oriented Approaches, MDPI Journal Sustainability, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. T. Thaker, ESP8266 based implementation of wireless sensor network with Linux based web-server, Symposium on Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. M. L. Beníteza, T. D. Drysdaleb, S. Hadfieldc and M. I. Maricar, Prototype for Multidisciplinary Research in the context of the Internet of Things, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    APCORISE '21: Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering
    May 2021
    672 pages
    ISBN:9781450390385
    DOI:10.1145/3468013

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate68of110submissions,62%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format