skip to main content
10.1145/3469595.3469601acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Hey Google, Can You Help Me Learn?

Published:27 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this provocation, we discuss the capacities and limitations of using commercially available smart speakers like Amazon Echo and Google Home to support informal learning. Bridging theories in self-regulated learning (SRL) and metacognition, we discuss whether smart speakers can (1) help learners to learn on their own and (2) help learners to learn better. We evaluate the current applications of smart speakers on learning and suggest future directions to harness smart speakers as learning partners in informal learning.

References

  1. Vincent Aleven, Ido Roll, Bruce Mclaren, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2010. Automated, Unobtrusive, Action-by-Action Assessment of Self-Regulation During Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System. Educational Psychologist 45: 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517740Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Frank Bentley, Chris Luvogt, Max Silverman, Rushani Wirasinghe, Brooke White, and Danielle Lottridge. 2018. Understanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3: 91:1-91:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264901Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cynthia Breazeal. 2003. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3: 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michelene T. H. Chi, Nicholas De Leeuw, Mei-Hung Chiu, and Christian Lavancher. 1994. Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science 18, 3: 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eugene Cho. 2019. Hey Google, Can I Ask You Something in Private? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 258:1-258:9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Leigh Clark, Nadia Pantidi, Orla Cooney, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Justin Edwards, Brendan Spillane, Christine Murad, Cosmin Munteanu, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2019. What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300705Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David A Cook. 2007. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clinical Medicine 7, 1: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.7-1-37Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Scotty D. Craig, Jeremiah Sullins, Amy Witherspoon, and Barry Gholson. 2006. The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning. Cognition and Instruction 24, 4: 565–591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, and Rein Ove Sikveland. 2019. Progressivity for voice interface design. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’19), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Arthur Graesser and Danielle McNamara. 2010. Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language. Educational Psychologist 45, 4: 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jeffrey A. Greene and Roger Azevedo. 2010. The Measurement of Learners’ Self-Regulated Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes While Using Computer-Based Learning Environments. Educational Psychologist 45, 4: 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Thomas D. Griffin, Benjamin D. Jee, and Jennifer Wiley. 2009. The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition 37, 7: 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.1001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lucy Handley. 2019. More than 50% of people use voice assistants to “ask fun questions.” Here's what else they do. CNBC. Retrieved March 27, 2020 from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/26/what-do-people-use-smart-speakers-for-asking-fun-questions.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Saj-Nicole A. Joni and Elliot Soloway. 1986. But My Program Runs! Discourse Rules for Novice Programmers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2, 1: 95–125. https://doi.org/10.2190/6E5W-AR7C-NX76-HUT2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hyunhoon Jung, Hee Jae Kim, Seongeun So, Jinjoong Kim, and Changhoon Oh. 2019. TurtleTalk: An Educational Programming Game for Children with Voice User Interface. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Asher Koriat. 1997. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126, 4: 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. Lane and Kurt Vanlehn. 2003. Coached Program Planning: Dialogue-Based Support for Novice Program Design. SIGCSE Bulletin (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry Lieberman and Ted Selker. 2003. Agents for the User Interface. MIT Press: 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mollie McKillop, Brett R South, Anita Preininger, Mitch Mason, and Gretchen Purcell Jackson. 2021. Leveraging conversational technology to answer common COVID-19 questions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 28, 4: 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Oussama Metatla, Alison Oldfield, Taimur Ahmed, Antonis Vafeas, and Sunny Miglani. 2019. Voice User Interfaces in Schools: Co-designing for Inclusion with Visually-Impaired and Sighted Pupils. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 378:1-378:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Janet Metcalfe. 2009. Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study. Current directions in psychological science 18, 3: 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ali Montag. 2018. Here's what people actually ask Amazon's Alexa. CNBC. Retrieved March 8, 2020 from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/26/study-what-people-actually-ask-amazons-alexa.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nasim Motalebi, Eugene Cho, S. Shyam Sundar, and Saeed Abdullah. 2019. Can Alexa be your Therapist? How Back-Channeling Transforms Smart-Speakers to be Active Listeners. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW ’19), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Chelsea Myers, Anushay Furqan, Jessica Nebolsky, Karina Caro, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Patterns for How Users Overcome Obstacles in Voice User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 6:1-6:7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christi Olson. 2016. Just say it: The future of search is voice and personal digital assistants. Retrieved March 26, 2020 from https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/just-say-it-future-search-voice-personal-digital-assistants/1392459?utm_source=website&utm_medium=socialGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Christi Olson and Kelli Kemery. The 2019 Voice Report. Microsoft Advertising. Retrieved April 14, 2021 from https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en-us/insights/2019-voice-reportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 640:1-640:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Asad Raza, Hameedullah Kazi, and Muhammad Ali Nizamani. 2016. Metacognitive Mathematics Tutor: Mathematics Tutoring System with Metacognitive Strategies. International Journal of Computer Applications 153, 4: 21–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Gregory Schraw. 2010. Measuring Self-Regulation in Computer-Based Learning Environments. Educational Psychologist 45, 4: 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Alex Sciuto, Arnita Saini, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jason I. Hong. 2018. “Hey Alexa, What's Up?”: A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’18), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Keith W. Thiede and John Dunlosky. 1999. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 4: 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jinping Wang, Hyun Yang, Ruosi Shao, Saeed Abdullah, and S. Shyam Sundar. 2020. Alexa as Coach: Leveraging Smart Speakers to Build Social Agents that Reduce Public Speaking Anxiety. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376561Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. David A. Wiley and Erin K. Edwards. 2002. Online Self-Organizing Social Systems: The Decentralized Future of Online Learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 3, 1: 33–46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rainer Winkler, Matthias Söllner, Maya Lisa Neuweiler, Flavia Conti Rossini, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2019. Alexa, Can You Help Us Solve This Problem? How Conversations With Smart Personal Assistant Tutors Increase Task Group Outcomes. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sports Facts | Google Assistant. Retrieved April 2, 2021 from https://assistant.google.com/services/a/uid/000000479dfb1490?hl=en-USGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nutrition Facts | Google Assistant. Retrieved April 2, 2021 from https://assistant.google.com/services/a/uid/000000cd6ebcb199?hl=en-USGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Dialogflow. Google Cloud. Retrieved March 28, 2021 from https://cloud.google.com/dialogflowGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Create a Trivia Action using templates | Actions on Google Templates. Google Developers. Retrieved March 28, 2021 from https://developers.google.com/assistant/templates/triviaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Hey Google, Can You Help Me Learn?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CUI '21: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces
      July 2021
      262 pages
      ISBN:9781450389983
      DOI:10.1145/3469595

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 July 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate34of100submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format