skip to main content
10.1145/3469877.3497694acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deep Reinforcement Learning and Docking Simulations for autonomous molecule generation in de novo Drug Design

Published:10 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In medicinal chemistry programs, it is key to design and make compounds that are efficacious and safe. In this study, we developed a new deep Reinforcement learning-based compounds molecular generation method. Because chemical space is impractically large, and many existing generation models generate molecules that lack effectiveness, novelty and unsatisfactory molecular properties. Our proposed method-DeepRLDS, which integrates transformer network, balanced binary tree search and docking simulation based on super large-scale supercomputing, can solve these problems well. Experiments show that more than 96 of the generated molecules are chemically valid, 99 of the generated molecules are chemically novelty, the generated molecules have satisfactory molecular properties and possess a broader chemical space distribution.

References

  1. [1]Jing Y, Bian Y, Hu Z, et al. Deep learning for drug design: an artificial intelligence paradigm for drug discovery in the big data era. AAPS J 2018; 20(3): 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1988; 28(1): 31–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]Xia X, Hu J, Wang Y, et al. Graph-based generative models for de novo drug design. Drug Discov Today Technol 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]Arús‑Pous J et al. Randomized SMILES strings improve the quality of molecular generative models. J Cheminform 11(1):71. https ://doi.org/10.1186/s1332 1‑019‑0393‑0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5]Bjerrum EJ (2017) SMILES enumeration as data augmentation for neural network modeling of molecules. arXiv :1703.07076 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07076. Accessed 19 Feb 2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL (1989) SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29(2):97–101. https ://doi.org/10.1021/ci000 62a008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7]M. H. S. Segler, T. Kogej, C. Tyrchan, and M. P. Waller, “Generating focused molecule libraries for drug discovery with recurrent neural networks,” ACS Cent. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8]X. Yang, J. Zhang, K. Yoshizoe, K. Terayama, and K. Tsuda. ChemTS: An Efficient Python Library for de novo Molecular Generation. ArXiv e-prints, Sept. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]M. Olivecrona, T. Blaschke, O. Engkvist, and H. Chen. Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Cheminformatics, 9(1):48, Sep 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10]Popova, M.; Isayev, O.; Tropsha, A. Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design. Science Advances 2018, 4, No. eaap7885.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] G. Lima Guimaraes, B. Sanchez-Lengeling, C. Outeiral, P. L. Cunha Farias, and A. AspuruGuzik. Objective-Reinforced Generative Adversarial Networks (ORGAN) for Sequence Generation Models. ArXiv e-prints, May 2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]B. Sanchez-Lengeling, C. Outeiral, G. L. Guimaraes, and A. Aspuru-Guzik. Optimizing distributions over molecular space. An Objective-Reinforced Generative Adversarial Network for Inverse-design Chemistry (ORGANIC). ChemRxiv e-prints, 8 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] E. Putin et al., “Adversarial threshold neural computer for molecular de novo design,” Mol. Pharm., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 4386–4397, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14]M. J. Kusner, B. Paige, and J. M. Hernández-Lobato. Grammar Variational Autoencoder. arXiv e-prints:1703.01925, March 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]Arus-Pous, J.; Blaschke, T.; Ulander, S.; Reymond, J.-L.; Chen, H.; Engqvist, O. Exploring the GDB-13 chemical space using deep generative models. J. Cheminformatics 2019, 11, 20-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Olivecrona, M.; Blaschke, T.; Engquist, O.; Chen, H. Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning. J. Cheminformatics 2017, 9, 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Brooks, W. H.; Guida, W. C.; Daniel, K. G. The significance of chirality in drug design and development. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2011,11, 760-70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] O’Boyle, N.; Dalke, A. DeepSMILES: An adaptation of SMILES for use in machine-learning of chemical structures. DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.7097960.v1. (accessed: 2019-06-07).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Stephen Heller, Alan McNaught, Stephen Stein, Dmitrii Tchekhovskoi, and Igor Pletnev. InChI - the worldwide chemical structure identifier standard. Journal of Cheminformatics, 5(1):7, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20]Robin Winter, Floriane Montanari, Frank Noé, and DjorkArné Clevert. Learning continuous and data-driven molecular descriptors by translating equivalent chemical representations. Chemical Science, 10(6):1692–1701, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] De Cao N, Kipf T. MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. In: ICML 2018 workshop on Theoretical Foundations and Applications of Deep Generative Models, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]W. Jin, R. Barzilay, and T. Jaakkola. Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04364, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]Gómez-Bombarelli R, Wei JN, Duvenaud D, et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Central Science 2018; 4(2): 268–76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]Kusner MJ, Paige B, Hernández-Lobato JM. Grammar variational autoencoder. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2017, 1945–54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]Dai H, Tian Y, Dai B, et al. Syntax-directed variational autoencoder for molecule generation. In: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]Simonovsky M, Komodakis N. Graphvae: T owards generation of small graphs using variational autoencoders. In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, 2018,412–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27]Li Y, Vinyals O, Dyer C, et al. Learning deep generative models of graphs. In: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF, et al. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2017, 1263–72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]You J, Ying R, Ren X, et al. GraphRNN: Generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2018, 5708–17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]Popova M, Shvets M, Oliva J, et al. MolecularRNN: Generating realistic molecular graphs with optimized properties arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13372. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z. Multi-objective de novo drug design with conditional graph generative model. J. Cheminformatics 2018, 10, 33-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]Arjovsky, M.; Chintala, S.; Bottou, L. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2017, 214-223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Zhou, Z.; Kearnes, S.; Li, L.; Zare, R. N.; Riley, P. Optimization of molecules via deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08678 (accessed: 2019-06-07).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]Ståhl N, Falkman G, Karlsson A, Mathiason G, Boström J. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multiparameter Optimization in de novo Drug Design. J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jul 22;59(7):3166-3176. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00325. Epub 2019 Jul 5. PMID: 31273995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deep Reinforcement Learning and Docking Simulations for autonomous molecule generation in de novo Drug Design
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MMAsia '21: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia
          December 2021
          508 pages
          ISBN:9781450386074
          DOI:10.1145/3469877

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 January 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate59of204submissions,29%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format