skip to main content
10.1145/3469951.3469953acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesipmvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Automatic Calibration Method for Kerf Angle in Wafer Automated Optical Inspection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

To improve the accuracy of kerf angle, an automatic calibration method for kerf angle in wafer automated optical inspection is presented. First, the error model of inspection system is established and system angle deviations are calibrated. Next, normalized positioning-based the kerf edges of interest in multiple images are extracted. Then, the coordinate transformation considering the system angle deviation compensation is performed. Finally, the kerf edge line is fitted based on the least squares method to obtain the kerf angle and the kerf angle can be automatically calibrated by rotating the stage. The experimental results show that the kerf angle obtained is relatively stable by coordinate transformation of multiple images to enhance the information of kerf edge and the accuracy of kerf angle can reach within 0.02 degree. Besides, the kerf angle is more sensitive to the system angle deviation and the result is basically a linear increase.

References

  1. Abd Al Rahman M, Mousavi A. A Review and Analysis of Automatic Optical Inspection and Quality Monitoring Methods in Electronics Industry. IEEE Access, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen X, Chen J, Han X, A Light-Weighted CNN Model for Wafer Structural Defect Detection. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 24006-24018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Li H F, Pao D, Jayakumar R. Improvements and systolic implementation of the Hough transformation for straight line detection. Pattern Recognition, 1989, 22(6): 697-706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. York D. Least-squares fitting of a straight line. Canadian Journal of Physics, 1966, 44(5): 1079-1086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. York D. Least squares fitting of a straight line with correlated errors. Earth and planetary science letters, 1968, 5: 320-324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu X, Song L, Shen S, Parallel Hough transform-based straight line detection and its FPGA implementation in embedded vision. Sensors, 2013, 13(7): 9223-9247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bergues G J, Schürrer C, Brambilla N. Straight Line Detection Through Sub-pixel Hough Transform. Intelligent Computing-Proceedings of the Computing Conference. Springer, Cham, 2019: 1129-1137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Krystek M, Anton M. A least-squares algorithm for fitting data points with mutually correlated coordinates to a straight line. Measurement science and technology, 2011, 22(3): 035101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang J, Wang J, Shao J, Image recognition of icing thickness on power transmission lines based on a least squares Hough transform. Energies, 2017, 10(4): 415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Xue B, Tong N. DIOD: Fast and efficient weakly semi-supervised deep complex ISAR object detection. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019, 49(11): 3991-4003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Xue B, Tong N. Real-world ISAR object recognition using deep multimodal relation learning. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2019, 50(10): 4256-4267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Xue B, Yi W, Jing F, Complex ISAR target recognition using deep adaptive learning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 97: 104025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Li X, Li J, Hu X, Line-CNN: End-to-End Traffic line detection with line proposal unit. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 21(1): 248-258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pei S C, Horng J H. Circular arc detection based on Hough transform. Pattern recognition letters, 1995, 16(6): 615-625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1979, 9(1): 62-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Suzuki S. Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, 1985, 30(1): 32-46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IPMV '21: Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Image Processing and Machine Vision
    May 2021
    87 pages
    ISBN:9781450390040
    DOI:10.1145/3469951

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format