skip to main content
10.1145/3470716.3470734acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicieiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of Water Filtration System Through Water Quality Testing Using Fuzzy Logic

Published:14 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Physicochemical parameters of water that have passed through the water filtration system cannot be tested without proper evaluation and measuring tools. The study uses a system with a device that has an array of sensors that measures the pH, turbidity, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids of the pre- and post-filtered water. The water quality standards of filtered water were used as the basis for the fuzzy logic algorithm to define the effectiveness of filtered rainwater and tap water. In getting a probability value of 0.96, it shows that there is a significant difference with the pre-filtered and post-filtered parameter values of rainwater and tap water. Based on the evaluation using fuzzy logic, it also shows that the pre-filtered water has changed into a more acceptable value after the filtration process. With the laboratory testing results to test the accuracy of the device, a probability value of 0.97 was able to calculate, which denotes no significant difference between the measured values of the device with the laboratory result.

References

  1. World Health Organization, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edition, incorporating the 1st addendum. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. B. G. Ibarra , “Water quality monitoring system using 3g network,” J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng., vol. 10, no. 1–13, pp. 15–18, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Das and P. C. Jain, “Real-time water quality monitoring system using Internet of Things,” 2017 Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Electron. COMPTELIX 2017, pp. 78–82, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. D. De Guzman, F. A. M. Josue, M. J. S. Raynes, and M. A. C. Purio, “Feedback Control and Monitoring System for a Potable Rainwater and Groundwater Harvester,” IEEE Reg. 10 Annu. Int. Conf. Proceedings/TENCON, vol. 2018-Octob, no. October, pp. 1657–1662, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Max, E. Weiss, and G. R. Hierz, “SmartCoast: A Wireless Sensor Network for water quality Monitoring,” Proc. - Conf. Local Comput. Networks, LCN, no. April 2014, pp. 919–926, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. M. T. Qadri, M. A. Islam, A. Raza, M. R. Shalaby, and R. A. Sheikh, “Physico-chemical analysis, classification of ground water, and impact of water quality on the health of people in Khushab City, Pakistan,” IET Conf. Publ., vol. 2018, no. CP750, pp. 5–8, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. A. Arockiaraj and E. R. Nagarajan, “Determination of physico-chemical parameter and trace metal contents of drinking water samples in Tiruchirappalli, India,” 2nd Int. Conf. Curr. Trends Eng. Technol. ICCTET 2014, pp. 174–179, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. M. Taghoy and J. F. Villaverde, “A Fuzzy Logic Approach for the Determination of Cavendish Banana Shelf Life,” IEEE Reg. 10 Annu. Int. Conf. Proceedings/TENCON, vol. 2018-Octob, no. October, pp. 2467–2472, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Haiyunnisa, H. S. Alam, and T. I. Salim, “Design and implementation of fuzzy logic control system for water quality control,” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Autom. Cogn. Sci. Opt. Micro Electro-Mechanical Syst. Inf. Technol. ICACOMIT 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 98–102, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. A. Padilla , “ZigBee and Power Line Communications interconnectivity applied to fuzzy logic controlled automated lighting system,” Proc. - 6th IEEE Int. Conf. Control Syst. Comput. Eng. ICCSCE 2016, no. November, pp. 430–434, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. R. Bhakare and S. S. Mathurkar, “Real time embedded system for assessment of potable water quality,” IEEE Int. Conf. Power, Control. Signals Instrum. Eng. ICPCSI 2017, pp. 1393–1397, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Indu and J. J. Choondal, “Modeling, development & analysis of low cost device for water quality testing,” 2016 IEEE Annu. India Conf. INDICON 2016, pp. 1–6, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. F. L. Valiente , “Internet of things (IOT)-based mobile application for monitoring of automated aquaponics system,” 2018 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Inf. Technol. Commun. Control. Environ. Manag. HNICEM 2018, pp. 1–6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. A. E. Latina, D. H. L. Baking, J. E. S. Fernandez, A. D. R. Guevarra, and R. J. R. Rastrullo, “Development of Device under Test ( DUT ) Board of LM741 Op-amp IC for Test Development and Measurement track of Mapua University.”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. N. Yumang, C. C. Paglinawan, E. C. Garcia, and L. C. M. Andrada, “Optimization of Vehicle Speed Calculation on Raspberry Pi Using Sparse Random Projection,” 2018 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Inf. Technol. Control. Environ. Manag., pp. 1–6, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIEI '21: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations
    April 2021
    145 pages
    ISBN:9781450389488
    DOI:10.1145/3470716

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format