skip to main content
10.1145/3471274.3471286acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageshp3cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Research on multi link data diversion of power wireless heterogeneous network based on improved nsga-2

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

with the diversification of power services and the access of mass terminals, different services have different QoS requirements, large bandwidth, low delay and low cost. In this regard, the power heterogeneous network parallel transmission technology is used to improve the power business transmission capacity, and data diversion is an important problem of parallel transmission. The minimum transmission delay model and cost model of wireless heterogeneous network are established. Combined with the improved nsga-2 algorithm, the multi-objective function model is solved. The results show that the improved nsga-2 algorithm can quickly solve the Pareto optimal solution and the optimal data transmission parameters of each link.

References

  1. H. Yang, Y. Zhang, W. Ding and Z. Zhang, "Initial Attitude Acquisition of Star Sensor based on NSGA2-LM Hybrid Optimization Algorithms," 2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), 2019, pp. 1206-1210, doi: 10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yun Lin.(2021).Test configuration method based on E-dominant NSGA2. Journal of Physics: Conference Series(1),. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1754/1/012146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Qing Li,,Xiuying Wang & Xiaofeng Zhang.(2018).A Scheduling Method Based on NSGA2 for Steelmaking and Continuous Casting Production Process. IFAC PapersOnLine(18),. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Laurent Lemarchand,,Damien Massé,,Pascal Rebreyend,... & Alessandra Oppio.(2018).Multiobjective Optimization for Multimode Transportation Problems. Advances in Operations Research(),. doi:10.1155/2018/8720643..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. J. Perez, "M-SPOT: A Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for Node Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks," 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2018, pp. 264-269, doi: 10.1109/WAINA.2018.00096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyukmin Son, Sanghoon Lee, Soo-Chang Kim. Soft Load Balancing Over Heterogeneous Wireless Networks[J].IEEE Transactionson Vehieular Technology, 2018, 57(4): 2632-2638.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Louha Kuheli, Jun Jung Hyun, Agrawal Dharma P. Exploring Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Networks by Rate Distribution[C]. 2008 IEEE International Performanc Computing and Communications Conferenee, IPCCC 2018, Austin, TX, United States, 2018:427-432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu Tingrui,Li Xin,Tan Liguo,Song Shenmin. A novel adaptive greedy strategy based on Gaussian mixture clustering for multiobjective optimization[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation,2021,61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Xuemin Ma,Jingming Yang,Hao Sun,Ziyu Hu,Lixin Wei. Multiregional co-evolutionary algorithm for dynamic multiobjective optimization[J]. Information Sciences,2021,545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hassan N. Noura,Reem .Melki,Rouwaida. Secure MIMO D2D communication based on a lightweight and robust PLS cipher scheme[J]. Wireless Networks,2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wen-jun LIU & Bin CHEN.(2019).Complex Network Community Detection by Improved Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm..(eds.)Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information Technology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ITEEE 2019)(pp.112-116).DEStech Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jing Xiao,,Jing-Jing Li,,Xi-Xi Hong,... & Jesus Medina.(2018).An Improved MOEA/D Based on Reference Distance for Software Project Portfolio Optimization. Complexity(),. doi:10.1155/2018/3051854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jing Xiao,,Jing-Jing Li,,Xi-Xi Hong,... & Jesus Medina.(2018).An Improved MOEA/D Based on Reference Distance for Software Project Portfolio Optimization. Complexity(),. doi:10.1155/2018/3051854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Li, Y. Du, X. Ma and S. Huang, "A 3-param network secletion algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks," 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2017, pp. 392-396, doi: 10.1109/ICCSN.2017.8230142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Feng, L. Guomin and G. Wenrong, "Heterogeneous Network Resource Allocation Optimization Based on Improved Bat Algorithm," 2018 International Conference on Sensor Networks and Signal Processing (SNSP), 2018, pp. 55-59, doi: 10.1109/SNSP.2018.00020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Z. Zhang, F. Liu and Z. Zeng, "The cell zooming algorithm for energy efficiency optimization in heterogeneous cellular network," 2017 9th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 2017, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/WCSP.2017.8171171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. P. and M. S. S., "Traffic Control in 5G Heterogenous Network," 2019 International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking (ViTECoN), 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ViTECoN.2019.8899759.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. A. Hasnat, S. T. A. Rumee, M. A. Razzaque and M. Mamun-Or-Rashid, "Security Study of 5G Heterogeneous Network: Current Solutions, Limitations & Future Direction," 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), 2019, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ECACE.2019.8679326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Xu, C. Qiu, A. Guo and C. Zhao, "Access control for software-defined heterogeneous wireless access network," 2016 16th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), 2016, pp. 520-524, doi: 10.1109/ISCIT.2016.7751686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Wu, M. Wang, B. Ma and K. Chen, "Heterogeneous Networks Topology Optimization Based on Simulated Annealing Algorithm," 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), 2020, pp. 2074-2078, doi: 10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9084791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    HP3C '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on High Performance Compilation, Computing and Communications
    June 2021
    71 pages
    ISBN:9781450389648
    DOI:10.1145/3471274

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format