ABSTRACT
The increasing use of artificial intelligence technologies in several areas of knowledge highlights the need to design solutions for people with different backgrounds and skills. Since data collection to use such technologies and obtain reliable results is still a challenge, the statistical technique of Design of Experiments (DOE) can be applied to address this issue gathering less biased and more balanced data. However, to apply DOE effectively is required a high level of specific statistical knowledge, making difficult for most people to use the technique. In this paper we discuss the design and evaluation of a software prototype for people to apply DOE without statistical knowledge. The results of prototype tests reveal that some technical terms are difficult to understand, even when explained. Despite this, results also show that real-life examples were helpful for participants understand concepts related to DOE. We hope our results can inspire Human-Computer Interaction community to design solutions for artificial intelligence technologies, making it more accessible for people from different fields. We believe this multidisciplinary approach contributes to solve real people's needs.
- 2014. Planejamento de Experimentos (DOE). Retrieved Jun 03, 2021 from http://www5.eesc.usp.br/portaldeconhecimentos/index.php/por/Conteudo/Planejamento-de-Experimentos-DOEGoogle Scholar
- Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 1 (1994), 49--59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brasil. 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Retrieved May 30, 2021 from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htmGoogle Scholar
- Bruce G. Buchanan. 2005. A (very) brief history of artificial intelligence. AI Magazine 26, 4 (2005), 53--60. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1848Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abel W. de Albuquerque, José R. Santos, Gilson Moura Filho, and Ligia S. Reis. 2013. Plantas de cobertura e adubação nitrogenada na produção de milho em sistema de plantio direto. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental [online] 17, 7 (2013), 721--726. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000700005Google Scholar
- Fabiani de Souza, Claudinei Martins, and Suelen Silva. 2017. Usability, Accessibility and Affectibility in CPqD. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Joinville, Brazil) (IHC 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160504.3160583Google ScholarDigital Library
- Angela Dean, Daniel Voss, and Danel Draguljić. 1999. Design and Analysis of Experiments (2 ed.). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52250-0Google Scholar
- Elaine C. S. Hayashi, Julián E. Gutiérrez Posada, Vanessa R. M. L. Maike, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2016. Exploring New Formats of the Self-Assessment Manikin in the Design with Children. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (São Paulo, Brazil) (IHC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 27, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3033701.3033728Google ScholarDigital Library
- Microsoft. 2001. For 10 Years, Microsoft Publisher Helps Small Business Users 'Do More Than They Thought They Could'. Retrieved May 28, 2021 from https://news.microsoft.com/2001/10/15/for-10-years-microsoft-publisher-helps- small-business-users-do-more-than-they-thought-they-could/Google Scholar
- Jakob Nielsen. 2001. Success Rate: The Simplest Usability Metric. Retrieved May 31, 2021 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/success-rate-the-simplest-usability-metric/Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 2004. Emotional Design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Adroaldo Guimarães Rossetti, Francisco das Chagas Vidal Neto, Dheyne Silva Melo, Luiz Augusto Lopes Serrano, Fernando José Hawerroth, Carlos Alberto Kenji Taniguchi, Marlon Vagner Valentim Martins, Francisco Xavier de Souza, and Marlos Alves Bezerra. 2017. Orientações para instalação, condução e avaliação de experimentos de campo. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical-Documentos (INFOTECA-E) (2017). Retrieved Jun 07, 2021 from https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1079923/orientacoes-para-instalacao-conducao-e-avaliacao-de-experimentos-de-campoGoogle Scholar
- Willy Vandenbrande. 2005. Design of Experiments For Dummies. Quality Progress 38 (apr 2005), 59--65. Retrieved Jun 04, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296026895_Design_of_experiments_for_dummiesGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Making Design of Experiments (DOE) accessible for everyone: Prototype design and evaluation
Recommendations
Accessible EPUB: Making EPUB 3 Documents Universal Accessible
Computers Helping People with Special NeedsAbstractCurrent document standards have the characteristic that they can only serve one group of users under the aspect of vision (sighted, visually impaired or blind reader). Wouldn’t it be nice if one documentformat could combine all properties in one ...
Making "making" accessible
IDC '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenAssistive technologies empower individuals to accomplish tasks they might not be able to do otherwise. Unfortunately, a large percentage of assistive devices that are purchased (35% or more) end up unused or abandoned [8], leaving many people with ...
eReader interface design for page-turning
HCI '18: Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction ConferenceThere remain numerous unanswered questions regarding how to design eReaders that are effective for the range of reading purposes required by readers. This broad research area requires the attention of HCI, design, and reading researchers alike. This ...
Comments