skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484362acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Communication and Personality: how COVID-19 government chatbots express themselves

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the COVID-19 pandemic, governments have used applications to help citizens to be informed about the disease. Some applications use chatbots, which despite the advances, still represent challenges for researchers and designers in the domain of human-computer interaction (HCI). Therefore, this paper aims to evaluate three Brazilian government chatbots focused on COVID-19, considering two perspectives: communication (which involves communicability and language) and personality. For this, we used the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) to evaluate the chatbots' communicability and best practice guidelines for evaluating the chatbots' language and personality. As a result, we show that chatbots make little use of communicability strategies. In addition, they do not convey personality traits. We also discussed the relationship between personality and the designer's self-expression, making room for potential future work in the area. The research contributes to the extent that the study of COVID-19 chatbots in the current pandemic scenario is important and presents a methodology for assessing the language and personality of chatbots.

References

  1. Mauricio Agudelo, Eduardo Chomali, Jesus Suniaga, Georgina Nunez, Valeria Jordan, Fernando Rojas, Jorge Negrete, Jorge Bravo, Paula Bertolini, Raúl Katz, and others. 2020. Las oportunidades de la digitalización en América Latina frente al COVID-19. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson N. Alves. 2019. Autoexpressão do designer do Nubank: um estudo de caso no aplicativo. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso. Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Quixadá, Brazil. In Portuguese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aggeliki Androutsopoulou, Nikos Karacapilidis, Euripidis Loukis, and Yannis Charalabidis. 2019. Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots. Government Information Quarterly 36, 2 (2019), 358--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Naomi Aoki. 2020. An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 37, 4 (2020), 101490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gopi Battineni, Nalini Chintalapudi, and Francesco Amenta. 2020. AI Chatbot design during an epidemic like the novel coronavirus. In Healthcare, Vol. 8. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg and Asbjørn Følstad. 2018. Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations. Interactions 25, 5 (2018), 38--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Zoraida Callejas, Ramón López-Cózar, Nieves Ábalos, and David Griol. 2011. Affective conversational agents: the role of personality and emotion in spoken interactions. In Conversational agents and natural language interaction: Techniques and effective practices. IGI Global, 203--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Heloisa Candello and Claudio Pinhanez. 2016. Designing Conversational Interfaces. Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais-IHC (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ana Paula Chaves and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2020. How Should My Chatbot Interact? A Survey on Social Characteristics in Human-Chatbot Interaction Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2020), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ministério da Saúde. 2020. Coronavírus: o que você precisa saber e como prevenir o contágio. https://coronavirus.saude.gov.br. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Luciana da Silveira Espindola and Milene Selbach Silveira. 2017. Self-expression and discourse continuity in a multilevel EUD environment: The case of moodle. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 40 (2017), 36--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kate Daley, Ines Hungerbuehler, Kate Cavanagh, Heloísa Garcia Claro, Paul Alan Swinton, and Michael Kapps. 2020. Preliminary evaluation of the engagement and effectiveness of a mental health chatbot. Frontiers in digital health 2 (2020), 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Antonella De Angeli, Graham I Johnson, and Lynne Coventry. 2001. The unfriendly user: exploring social reactions to chatterbots. In Proceedings of the international conference on affective human factors design, london. Citeseer, 467--474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Centro de Operações de Emergência em Saúde Pública. 2020. Plano de contingência do Estado de São Paulo para infecção humana pelo novo coronavírus-2019-nCoV. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Secretaria de Saúde do Estado de Sergipe. 2020. Plano de contingência estadual para infecção humana pelo novo coronavírus 2019-nCoV. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Secretaria de Saúde do Estado do Ceará. 2020. Plano estadual de contingência para resposta às emergências em saúde pública: novo coronavírus (2019-nCoV). (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarisse Sieckenius De Souza. 2005. The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarisse Sieckenius De Souza, Carla Faria Leitão, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Elton José Da Silva. 2006. The semiotic inspection method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian symposium on Human factors in computing systems. 148--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Clarisse S De Souza, Raquel O Prates, and Simone DJ Barbosa. 1999. A method for evaluating software communicability. Monografias em Ciência da Computação. Departamento de Informática. PUC-RioInf 1200, 1 (1999), 11--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohji Dohsaka, Ryota Asai, Ryuichiro Higashinaka, Yasuhiro Minami, and Eisaku Maeda. 2014. Effects of conversational agents on activation of communication in thought-evoking multi-party dialogues. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 97, 8 (2014), 2147--2156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Ramtin Attar.2009. A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 649--658.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sviatlana Hoehn and Kerstin Bongard. 2020. Heuristic Evaluation of COVID-19 Chatbots. Proceedings of CONVERSATIONS 2020 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lia Maulia Indrayani, Rosaria Mita Amalia, and Fauzia Zahira Munirul Hakim. 2020. Emotive Expressions on Social Chatbot. Jurnal Sosioteknologi 18, 3 (2020), 509--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mohit Jain, Pratyush Kumar, Ramachandra Kota, and Shwetak N Patel. 2018. Evaluating and informing the design of chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 895--906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yanran Li, Hui Su, Xiaoyu Shen, Wenjie Li, Ziqiang Cao, and Shuzi Niu. 2017. Dailydialog: A manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03957 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Helena Lindgren, Esteban Guerrero, and Rebecka Janols. 2017. Personalised persuasive coaching to increase older adults' physical and social activities: a motivational model. In International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Springer, 170--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Andreas Lommatzsch. 2018. A next generation chatbot-framework for the public administration. In International Conference on Innovations for Community Services. Springer, 127--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Theodora A Maniou and Andreas Veglis. 2020. Employing a chatbot for news dissemination during crisis: Design, implementation and evaluation. Future Internet 12, 7 (2020), 109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist 52, 5 (1997), 509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. Affective conversational interfaces. In The Conversational Interface. Springer, 329--357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Adam S Miner, Liliana Laranjo, and A Baki Kocaballi. 2020. Chatbots in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. NPJ digital medicine 3, 1 (2020), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingrid T.Monteiro. 2015. Autoexpressão e engenharia semiótica do usuário-designer. Ph.D. Thesis. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In Portuguese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Luana Müller, Milene Selbach Silveira, and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2015. Mine, Yours, Ours: Examples Reuse and the Self-Expression of Programming Students. In Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 30, 10 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3148456.3148486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Nicolas Munsch, Alistair Martin, Stefanie Gruarin, Jama Nateqi, Isselmou Abdarahmane, Rafael Weingartner-Ortner, and Bernhard Knapp. 2020. A benchmark of online COVID-19 symptom checkers. medRxiv (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Raquel O Prates, Clarisse S De Souza, and Simone DJ Barbosa. 2000. Methods and tools: a method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces. interactions 7, 1 (2000), 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Peter Salovey and John D Mayer. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality 9, 3 (1990), 185--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Anna-Maria Seeger and Armin Heinzl. 2018. Human versus machine: Contingency factors of anthropomorphism as a trust-inducing design strategy for conversational agents. In Information systems and neuroscience. Springer, 129--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuva Lunde Smestad and Frode Volden. 2018. Chatbot personalities matters. In International Conference on Internet Science. Springer, 170--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Pol Pérez Sust, Oscar Solans, Joan Carles Fajardo, Manuel Medina Peralta, Pepi Rodenas, Jordi Gabaldà, Luis Garcia Eroles, Adrià Comella, César Velasco Muñoz, Josuè Sallent Ribes, and others. 2020. Turning the crisis into an opportunity: digital health strategies deployed during the COVID-19 outbreak. JMIR public health and surveillance 6, 2 (2020), e19106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Navid Tavanapour, Mathis Poser, and E. Bittner. 2019. Supporting the Idea Generation Process in Citizen Participation - toward an Interactive System with a Conversational Agent as Facilitator. In ECIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. James A Thorson and FC Powell. 1993. Sense of humor and dimensions of personality. Journal of clinical Psychology 49, 6 (1993), 799--809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Francisco AM Valério, Tatiane G Guimarães, Raquel O Prates, and Heloisa Candello. 2017. Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users. In Proceedings of the xvi brazilian symposium on human factors in computing systems. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. WHO. 2020. Coronavirus. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus. (2020). Accessado: 05-05-2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. WHO. 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report 51. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200311-sitrep-51-covid-19.pdf. (2020). Accessado: 05-05-2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Marvin Zuckerman, D Michael Kuhlman, Jeffrey Joireman, Paul Teta, and Michael Kraft. 1993. A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of personality and social psychology 65, 4 (1993), 757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Communication and Personality: how COVID-19 government chatbots express themselves

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            October 2021
            523 pages
            ISBN:9781450386173
            DOI:10.1145/3472301

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate29of77submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader