skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484367acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing MoLIC's Applicability to Model the interaction of Conversational Agents: A case study on ANA Chatbot

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Intelligent conversational agents, such as chatbots, are becoming increasingly popular in different domains of use. The use of this kind of technology offers challenges and opportunities for the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) area, because it is based on natural language conversations, and it can present different degrees of intelligence and autonomy. One of these challenges is to investigate whether the existing design techniques are adequate to model this kind of agent. Semiotic Engineering relies on MoLIC, which is a tool used in the design phase to model interaction and communication between a system and its users. Therefore, a raised question is whether MoLIC would be able to model conversational agents. In this sense, the goal of this work is to present the emerging results of a research that seeks to analyze the MoLIC's applicability to model the interaction of conversational agents, through a case study on Chatbot ANA. The results show that MoLIC can model the conversation, according to some adaptations and that some points can be extended in the tool. The contributions of this study focus on (1) broadening the knowledge of the HCI community about the MoLIC's applicability to model this kind of technology and (2) directing the IHC community towards new initiatives that aim to adapt MoLIC to model conversational agents.

References

  1. Simone D. J. Barbosa and Bruno S. da Silva. 2007. Designing human-computer interaction with MoLIC diagrams-a practical guide. Monografias em Ciência da Computação 12 (2007): 12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Simone D. J. Barbosa and Bruno S. da Silva. 2014. Design da interação humano-computador com MoLIC. Livro dos Tutoriais do XIII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais. pp 109--138Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniela M. Vieira Barros, and Aníbal M. Guerreiro. 2019. Novos desafios da educação a distância: programação e uso de Chatbots. Revista Espaço Pedagógico. 26, 2 (maio 2019), 410 - 431. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5335/rep.v26i2.8743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ana Paula de Carvalho, Fabrício Horácio Sales Pereira, Oto Braz Assunção, Amanda Fernandes Pereira, and Raquel Oliveira Prates. 2019. An analysis of MoLIC's consolidation. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 1--15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3357155.3358461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Asbjørn Følstad and Petter Bae Brandtzæg. 2017. Chatbots and the new world of HCI. interactions 24, 4 (July-August 2017), 38--42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3085558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Laranjo, Liliana, Adam G. Dunn, Huong Ly Tong, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Jessica Chen, Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian et al. "Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, no. 9 (2018): 1248--1258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Natália Oliveira, Allan Costa, Diovanni Araujo, and Carlos Portela. 2019. HelpCare: Um Protótipo de ChatBot para o Auxílio do Tratamento de Doenças Crônicas. In Anais do XIX Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Aplicada à Saúde, junho 11, 2019, Niterói, Brasil. SBC, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 282--287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbcas.2019.6263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Francisco A. M. Valério, Tatiane G. Guimarães, Raquel O. Prates, and Heloisa Candello. 2017. Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 1--10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3160504.3160544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Meyer von Wolff, R., Hobert, S., & Schumann, M. (2019). How May I Help You? State of the Art and Open Research Questions for Chatbots at the Digital Workplace. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, 8-11 January, 95--104. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing MoLIC's Applicability to Model the interaction of Conversational Agents: A case study on ANA Chatbot

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2021
      523 pages
      ISBN:9781450386173
      DOI:10.1145/3472301

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate29of77submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader