skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484372acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Omotenashi: A study about the cultural adaptation of an intelligent agent on Blip

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The development and use of intelligent agents are currently growing vertiginously. This growth has raised awareness of big technology companies that launched platforms that ease chatbot development. However, chatbots still fail to meet users' social expectations associated with cultural values imbued during the chatbot development (concerned or not with anthropomorphic topics). In literature, nowadays, there is a lack of research on culture in chatbot building platforms, primarily focusing on non-programmers. This research investigates interactive resources for cultural adaptation on the Blip Builder platform based on Semiotic Engineering. We evaluate the Blip communicability using the Semiotic Inspection Method combined with the Cultural Viewpoint Metaphors, followed by an autoethnography step in the design process of a conversational agent based on Omotenashi, a Japanese cultural characteristic. The main results indicate that the platform offers opportunities that enable cultural adaptation, mainly improving the adaptation of the chatbot behavior to the Omotenashi properties. But also convey some barriers for cultural expression.

References

  1. M Al-Saleh and Daniela Romano. 2015. Culturally Appropriate Behavior in Virtual Agents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg and Asbjørn Følstad. 2018. Chatbots. Interactions 25, 5 (Aug. 2018), 38--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Breazeal, J. Gray, and M. Berlin. 2009. An Embodied Cognition Approach to Mindreading Skills for Socially Intelligent Robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research 28 (2009), 656--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mohammad Yaqub Chaudhary. 2019. AUGMENTED REALITY, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND THE RE-ENCHANTMENT OF THE WORLD. Zygon® 54, 2 (May 2019), 454--478. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12521Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhifa Chen, Yichen Lu, Mika P. Nieminen, and Andrés Lucero. 2020. Creating a Chatbot for and with Migrants. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395495Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. JTB Corp. 2018. JAPAN Trip Navigator. http://www.jtb.co.jp/inbound/appli/index.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sally Jo Cunningham and Matt Jones. 2005. Auto ethnography. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on Computer-human interaction making CHI natural - CHINZ '05. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073943.1073944Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Dale. 2016. The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering 22 (2016), 811--817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Luciana Cardoso de Castro Salgado, Carla Faria Leito, and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2012. A Journey Through Cultures: Metaphors for Guiding the Design of Cross-Cultural Interactive Systems. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Renato Fontoura de Gusmão Cerqueira, Luiz Marques Afonso, Rafael Rossi de Mello Brandão, and Juliana Soares Jansen Ferreira. 2016. Software Developers as Users. Springer International Publishing. 49-125 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42831-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza and Carla Faria Leitão. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 2, 1 (Jan. 2009), 1--122. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00173ed1v01y200901hci002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Carla Faria Leitão, Raquel Oliveira Prates, Silvia Amélia Bim, and Elton José da Silva. 2010. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1-2 (Jan. 2010), 22--40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nick Degens, Gert Jan Hofstede, Samuel Mascarenhas, André Silva, Ana Paiva, Felix Kistler, Elisabeth Andre, Aleksandra Swiderska, Eva Krumhuber, Arvid Kappas, Colette Hume, Lynne Hall, and Ruth Aylett. 2013. Traveller - Intercultural training with intelligent agents for young adults.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Catia Maria Dias Ferreira, Luciana C. de Castro Salgado, and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2014. Avaliação Da Metacomunicação Da Cultura Com Participação de UsuáRios de Sistemas Multiculturais. In Proceedings of the 13th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil) (IHC '14). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, BRA, 61--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Clifford Geertz. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Charles J. Kacmar Jane M. Carey. 2010. Cultural and Language Affects on Technology Acceptance and Attitude: Chinese Perspectives. International Journal of Information Technology (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin Kang and Lewen Wei. 2020. Promises of Anthropomorphism in Virtual Coaches: Current Research and Future Directions. Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan. 2020. Development of An e-commerce Sales Chatbot. In 2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT, IoT and AI (HONET). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/honet50430.2020.9322667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sebastian Krause, Mikhail Kozhevnikov, Eric Malmi, and Daniele Pighin. 2017. Redundancy Localization for the Conversationalization of Unstructured Responses. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, Saarbrücken, Germany, 115--126. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Andrés Lucero. 2018. Living Without a Mobile Phone. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrés Lucero, Audrey Desjardins, Carman Neustaedter, Kristina Höök, Marc Hassenzahl, and Marta E. Cecchinato. 2019. A Sample of One. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Mascarenhas, A. Paiva, D.M. Degens, J. McBreen, and G.J. Hofstede. 2011. How should I say this? Agents with culturally-appropriate verbal communication styles. Workshop on Culturally Motivated Virtual Characters (CMVC 2011) held at conference IVA (Intelligent Virtual Agents) 2011; Conference date: 15-09-2011 Through 17-09-2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Samuel Mascarenhas, Rui Prada, Ana Paiva, and Gert Jan Hofstede. 2013. Social Importance Dynamics: A Model for Culturally-Adaptive Agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 325--338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mateus Monteiro, Luciana Salgado, Flavio Seixas, and Rosimeire Santana. 2019. Co-design de um Agente Inteligente Conversacional para melhora da saúde de idosos. In Anais Estendidos do XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais. SBC, 27--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mateus Monteiro, Luciana Salgado, Flávio Seixas, and Rosimere Santana. 2020. Co-designing Strategies to Provide Telecare Through an Intelligent Assistant for Caregivers of Elderly Individuals. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 149--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kyo-Joong Oh, Dongkun Lee, Byungsoo Ko, and Ho-Jin Choi. 2017. A Chatbot for Psychiatric Counseling in Mental Healthcare Service Based on Emotional Dialogue Analysis and Sentence Generation. In 2017 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/mdm.2017.64Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ana Paiva, Iolanda Leite, Hana Boukricha, and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2017. Empathy in Virtual Agents and Robots: A Survey. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7, 3, Article 11 (Sept. 2017), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sara Perez-Soler, Sandra Juarez-Puerta, Esther Guerra, and Juan de Lara. 2021. Choosing a Chatbot Development Tool. IEEE Software (2021), 0--0. https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2020.3030198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Luis Rodriguez-Gil, Javier Garcia-Zubia, Pablo Orduna, Aitor Villar-Martinez, and Diego Lopez-De-Ipina. 2019. New Approach for Conversational Agent Definition by Non-Programmers: A Visual Domain-Specific Language. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 5262--5276. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2883500Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pavel Smutny and Petra Schreiberova. 2020. Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education 151 (2020), 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mark Srite. 2006. Culture as an Explanation of Technology Acceptance Differences: An Empirical Investigation of Chinese and US Users. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1 (Nov. 2006). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v14i1.4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Cicilia Suryawati, Isnin Ainie, and Ni Sarmi. 2019. The Application of Omotenashi in Japanese-Conceptualized Company in East Java. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st Asian Conference on Humanities, Industry, and Technology for Society, ACHITS 2019, 30-31 July 2019, Surabaya, Indonesia. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-7-2019.2287612Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Miwane Umewaka, Ryohei Suzuki, and Takashi Iba. 2020. Omotenashi Design Patterns. In 9th Asian Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (AsianPLoP 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Isaac Wang, Lea Buchweitz, Jesse Smith, Lara-Sophie Bornholdt, Jonas Grund, Jaime Ruiz, and Oliver Korn. 2020. Wow, You Are Terrible at This!. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383652.3423887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Langxuan Yin, Timothy Bickmore, and Dharma E. Cortés. 2010. The Impact of Linguistic and Cultural Congruity on Persuasion by Conversational Agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 343--349. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_36Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Shuo Zhou, Zhe Zhang, and Timothy Bickmore. 2017. Adapting a Persuasive Conversational Agent for the Chinese Culture. In 2017 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture and Computing). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/culture.and.computing.2017.42Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Omotenashi: A study about the cultural adaptation of an intelligent agent on Blip

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2021
      523 pages
      ISBN:9781450386173
      DOI:10.1145/3472301

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate29of77submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader