skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484376acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wearable device in the form of glasses to assist the visually impaired in detecting obstacles

Published:18 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data from the World Health Organization show that all over the world, 39 million people are blind and 246 million have low vision. In Brazil, according to research from the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics, half a million people are blind. In this context, social inclusion and development of accessibility tools help these people with mobility problems. However, there are difficulties in the identification of obstacles localized above the waist-level, like walls, columns, street lamps, tree branches, and others. These obstacles aren't easily identified by common canes used by visually impaired people and, as a result, accidents are very common. Therefore, we present a prototype version of a wearable device in the form of glasses that detects obstacles localized above the waist-level, with the help of an infrared sensor, a position sensor to prevent the generation of false positives or negatives, and a Kalman filter to smooth noise. Furthermore, we have an Android app available and we made experiments in both the lab and usability tests. Finally, the proposed technology reached 93% sensibility and 95% specificity.

References

  1. Simone Barbosa and Bruno Silva. 2010. Interação humano-computador. Elsevier Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rita BERSCH and José C TONOLLI. 2006. Introdução ao conceito de Tecnologia Assistiva e modelos de abordagem da deficiência. Bengala Legal (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fábio Lopes Brezolin, Guilherme Santos, João Cândido de Lima, Maurício Zanella, Rafael Rieder, and Ana Carolina B De Marchi. 2017. Evaluating the Performance of Wearable Tecassist Device using Aural and Tactile Feedbacks. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sylvain Cardin, Daniel Thalmann, and Frédéric Vexo. 2007. A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people. The Visual Computer 23, 2 (2007), 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leire Francés-Morcillo, Paz Morer-Camo, María Isabel Rodríguez-Ferradas, and Aitor Cazón-Martín. 2020. Wearable Design Requirements Identification and Evaluation. Sensors 20, 9 (2020), 2599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Vivian Genaro Motti and Kelly Caine. 2014. Understanding the wearability of head-mounted devices from a human-centered perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international symposium on wearable computers. 83--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Camila Guerra, Carlos A. Ferreira, Gabriel Vasconcelas, Letícia Saraiva, Marcelo Martins, Paulo A. Aguilar, and Roberta Dutra. 2018. Smart glasses: óculos inteligente para deficientes visuais. In Tecnologia Assistiva - Pesquisa e Conhecimento II (1 ed.). Fausto Orsi Medola e Luis Carlos Paschoarelli, Canal 6 Editora, 207--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. IBGE. 2010. Censo Demográfico, características gerais da população, religião e pessoas com deficiência. Rio de Janeiro 29 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlos A. Ferreira Jr., Hugo Duarte, Letícia S. Chaves, Marcelo M. da Silva, David S. Oliveira, and Paulo Aguilar. 2017. Smart Glasses: óculos inteligente para deficientes visuais. Retrieved Aug 1, 2021 from https://www.quixada.ufc.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Encontros-Universit%C3%A1rios-2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A Melo, Lara Schibelsky Godoy Piccolo, Ismael Mattos Andrade Ávila, and C Tambascia. 2009. Usabilidade, acessibilidade e inteligibilidade aplicadas em interfaces para analfabetos, idosos e pessoas com deficiência. Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais. 9 (2009). https://bityli.com/7BnI6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Amanda Meincke Melo. 2014. Acessibilidade e inclusão digital. Livro dos Tutoriais do XIII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais (2014), 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Amanda Meincke Melo and M Cecília C Baranauskas. 2005. Design e avaliação de tecnologia web-acessível. In Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Vol. 25. 1500--1544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vivian Genaro Motti and Kelly Caine. 2014. Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 58. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1820--1824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ayat A Nada, Mahmoud A Fakhr, and Ahmed F Seddik. 2015. Assistive infrared sensor based smart stick for blind people. In 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI). IEEE, 1149--1154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. World Health Organization et al. 2011. World report on disability 2011. World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sandra Regina Costa Pereira. 2018. Orientação e Mobilidade para Cegos: relevância do atendimento desde a infância até a universidade. Technical Report. INSTITUTO ITARD. https://bityli.com/yxCHqGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Louis Pizzarello, Adenike Abiose, Timothy Ffytche, Rainaldo Duerksen, R Thulasiraj, Hugh Taylor, Hannah Faal, Gullapali Rao, Ivo Kocur, and Serge Resnikoff. 2004. VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: a global initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness. Archives of ophthalmology 122, 4 (2004), 615--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandra Souza Rodrigues and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2019. Uma revisão sobre acessibilidade no desenvolvimento de Internet das Coisas: oportunidades e tendências. Revista de Sistemas e Computação-RSC 9, 1 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp, and Jennifer Preece. 2013. Design de Interação. Bookman Editora.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Joselito Santos and Tatiana Cristina Vasconcelos. 2018. ACESSIBILIDADE COMO FATOR DE INCLUSÃO ÀS PESSOAS COM DEFICIÊNCIA. REIN-REVISTA EDUCAÇÃO INCLUSIVA 2, 1 (2018), 35--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlos Alberto Silva and André Pimenta Freire. 2018. Inspeção da Acessibilidade de Aplicativos Móveis Utilizando Software Leitor de Telas. In Anais Estendidos do XVII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais (Belém). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. https://doi.org/10.5753/ihc.2018.4174Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wallace Ugulino and Hugo Fuks. 2015. Landmark identification with wearables for supporting spatial awareness by blind persons. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 63--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R Weishaln. 1990. Orientation and mobility in the blind children. New York: Englewood Cliffs (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Greg Welch, Gary Bishop, et al. 1995. An introduction to the Kalman filter. (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Wearable device in the form of glasses to assist the visually impaired in detecting obstacles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        October 2021
        523 pages
        ISBN:9781450386173
        DOI:10.1145/3472301

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 October 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate29of77submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader