skip to main content
10.1145/3472410.3472443acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Innovations in Doctoral Students Education and Training

Published:07 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper summarizes the experience gained so far from the training of doctoral students at the University of Ruse. An innovative web-based system, developed to support doctoral education, is presented. The system has been tested in real-world conditions during a period of more than five years, with full-time and part-time students enrolled in different professional fields at the University of Ruse. Innovative environments, methods and technologies used for doctoral training in pandemic conditions are discussed. Positive results were reported from the conducted experimental research and surveys.

References

  1. Santos, P., & Patrício, M. T. 2020. Academic culture in doctoral education: are companies making a difference in the experiences and practices of doctoral students in Portugal?. Academic culture in doctoral education: are companies making a difference in the experiences and practices of doctoral students in Portugal?, (15), 685-704. https://doi.org/10.28945/4665Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nerad, M. 2020. Governmental Innovation Policies, Globalisation, and Change in Doctoral Education Worldwide: Are Doctoral Programmes Converging? Trends and Tensions. In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 43-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Schlee, W., Hall, D. A., Canlon, B., Cima, R. F., de Kleine, E., Hauck, F., ... & Cederroth, C. R. 2018. Innovations in doctoral training and research on tinnitus: The European School on Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Research (ESIT) Perspective. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 9, 447. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00447Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettmann, J., Thompson, K., Padykula, N., & Berzoff, J. 2009. Innovations in doctoral education: Distance education methodology applied. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29(3), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230903018397Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (Eds.). 2014. Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1105942Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Meschitti, V. 2019. Can peer learning support doctoral education? Evidence from an ethnography of a research team. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1427711Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Berry, S. 2017. Building community in online doctoral classrooms: Instructor practices that support community. Online Learning, 21(2), n2. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V21I2.875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Zlatarov, P., Ivanova, G., Baeva, D., Antonova, D. 2018. Adaptive Software System for Optimization of the Admission and Management Process for Doctoral Students. In Proceedings of the Computational Methods in Systems and Software (pp. 323-332). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00184-1_30Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zlatarov, P., Ivanova, G., & Baeva, D. 2019. A web-based system for personalized learning path tracking of doctoral students. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), IEEE. pp. 773-778. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8757071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Zlatarov, P., Ivanova, G., Ibryamova, E., & Baeva, D. 2018. A user-centered software system for admission optimization and education process management for Ph. D. students. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Vol. 2, 144-151. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-18-090Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Deshpande, Anant. 2017. Faculty best practices to support students in the ‘virtual doctoral land’." Higher Education for the Future 4.1 12-30.https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631116681211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Maor, D., Ensor, J. D., & Fraser, B. J. 2016. Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: A review of research of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Welch, S. 2017. Virtual mentoring program within an online doctoral nursing education program: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2016-0049Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Innovations in Doctoral Students Education and Training

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CompSysTech '21: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
      June 2021
      230 pages
      ISBN:9781450389822
      DOI:10.1145/3472410

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format