ABSTRACT
E-learning has never been so proliferated as it was and still is at a time of global Covid-19 pandemic when higher education institutions globally were forced to switch to fully online education. The strengths and weakness of e-learning have long been discussed in the literature. Most of the claimed strengths depend on an appropriate pedagogy approach with a combination of relevant technologies. At the same time the limitations are mainly associated with the technological issues arising in the context of e-learning. Teachers' perspectives on the benefits and limitations of e-learning are seriously affected by a number of factors, such as their digital competences and experience in e-learning. The study of these factors and their effect on teachers’ perspectives could support the increase of the objectivity of teachers’ evaluation and attitudes towards e-learning in general. Thus this research aimed to identify the impact of experience of Sofia University (SU) academic staff in forced introduction of online education on their views and perspectives about e-learning and its strengths and limitations in particular. The research method was an online survey, conducted at the end of the academic 2019/2020 with 383 teachers from all 16 SU faculties. The paper focused on three main aspects – 1) teachers’ experience in online education before and during pandemic; 2) teachers’ views on strengths and weaknesses of e-learning; and 3) the impact of their experience on their views. Findings from data analysis revealed the existence of statistical dependencies between the experience in e-learning and the digital competencies of teachers before the pandemic, on the one hand, and different aspects of the online teaching during the pandemic, such as: the choice of e-learning environment; the ratio of synchronous / asynchronous forms of online learning; the frequency and variety of using e-resources in teaching and in supporting students’ self-preparation; the tools and forms of e-assessment, on the other hand. It appeared that far more negative attitudes are formed in inexperienced teachers, which in turn has affected their assessments of benefits and limitations that quality e-learning provides for students - they did not recognize the strengths of e-learning proven in theory and practice and exaggerated its negative aspects. Thus conclusions imposed that the forced introduction of online education has enriched the experience of teachers in this form of education, but also has discredited its quality from their perspective.
- Laura Czerniewicz, 2020. What we learnt from ‘going online' during university shutdowns in South Africa. PhilOnEdTech, https://philonedtech.com/what-we-learnt-from-going-online-during-university-shutdowns-in-south-africa/Google Scholar
- Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC). 2021. Networked Learning: Inviting Redefinition. Postdigit Sci Educ 3, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00167-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles Hodges, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust, and Aaron Bond. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27 March. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 10 April 2021.Google Scholar
- Roumiana Peytcheva-Forsyth, Lyubka Aleksieva, and Blagovesna Yovkova. 2018. The impact of technology on cheating and plagiarism in the assessment – The teachers’ and students’ perspectives,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol: 2048, issue:1, pp. 020037-1 - 020037-10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082055.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Goodyear. 2001. Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines, Deliverable 9 (Volume 3 of the Final Report to JCALT)Google Scholar
- George P. Connick (Ed.). 2020. The Distance Learner's Guide. Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications. 1999. (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ) ISBN:0-13-939513-X. Companion Website: http://www.prenhall.com/dlguideGoogle Scholar
- Mirjana M. Radović-Marković. 2010. Advantages and disadvantages of e-learning in comparison to traditional forms of learning, Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 10(2), 289-298Google Scholar
- Valentina Arkorful and Nelly Abaidoo. 2015. The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 12. No. 1. ISSN 1550-6908Google Scholar
- Pankaj Srivastava. 2018, Advantages & Disadvantages of E-Education & E-Learning, Journal of Retail Marketing & Distribution Management, Vol. 2, Issue, 03. 22-27, Dec, 2018Google Scholar
- Manijeh Sadeghi. 2019. A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations, International Journal of Research in English Education (2019) 4:1Google Scholar
- Ana Paula Martinho, Paula Vaz-Fernandes, Carla Padrel de Oliveira, Paula Bacelar-Nicolau, and Ulisses Miranda Azeiteiro, Sandra Caeiro. 2016. Strengths and Weaknesses of an E-learning Program in Environmental Sciences at Universidade Aberta, Portugal. In: Leal Filho W., Pace P. (eds) Teaching Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32928-4_4Google Scholar
- Nicole M. Wagner, Khaled Hassanein, and Milena M. Head. 2008. Who is responsible for E-learning in Higher Education? A Stakeholders’ Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 26-36.)Google Scholar
- Priyanka Gautam, 2020. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Online Learning, eLearning Basics, https://elearningindustry.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-online-learningGoogle Scholar
- Rashmi Sharma. 2020. Online Learning – Strengths and Weaknesses; https://www.schoolnow.in/online-learning-strengths-and-weaknesses/Google Scholar
- Tim Roberts and Joanne M. McInnerney. 2007. Seven Problems of Online Group Learning (and Their Solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 257-268.Google Scholar
- Amber D. Dumford and Angie L. Miller. 2018. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput High Educ 30, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Sarah-Jane Gregory and Jason Michael Lodge. 2015. Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education, Distance Education, 36:2, 210-230, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adele Bezuidenhout. 2015. Implications for academic workload of the changing role of distance educators, Distance Education, 36:2, 246-262, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.10550555Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roumiana Peytcheva-Forsyth and Lyubka Aleksieva. 2021. Forced Introduction of e-Assessment During COVID-19 Pandemic: How Did the Students Feel About That? (Sofia University Case), AIP Conference Proceedings, vol: 2333, 050013 (2021), pp. 050013-1 - 020037-11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041862Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stafford Global. 2020. What's the difference between Online Learning and Distance Learning? Retrieved May 19, 2021: https://www.staffordglobal.org/articles-and-blogs/whats-the-difference-between-online-and-distance-learning/Google Scholar
- The effect of the teachers' experience in online education during the pandemic on their views of strengths and weaknesses of e-learning (SU case)
Recommendations
Online learning versus blended learning: an exploratory study
L@S '14: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conferenceDue to the recent emergence of massive open online courses (MOOCs), students and teachers are gaining unprecedented access to high-quality educational content. However, many questions remain on how best to utilize that content in a classroom ...
Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning
The results complement research on self-regulated learning in online learning environments.Findings indicate the benefits of directed preflective prompts for novice learners.Personalisation and adaptation of prompting in online learning is crucial for ...
Understanding the Effect of In-Video Prompting on Learners and Instructors
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOnline instructional videos are ubiquitous, but it is difficult for instructors to gauge learners' experience and their level of comprehension or confusion regarding the lecture video. Moreover, learners watching the videos may become disengaged or fail ...
Comments