Gerry Chan
Rita Orji
ABSTRACT
In this research, using storyboard implementation, we investigate the relationship between social game elements and the Hexad user type model for motivating exercise and play. The goal is to see if and how different gamer types are associated with interest in social features and if they can be used as the basis for player compatibility matching (similar or complementary). Participants (N = 60) rated the level of perceived persuasiveness, enjoyment, social engagement, and intention for future play on 8 social elements for step-based asynchronous exergames. Preliminary results show a significant positive relationship between social game elements and player types. Correlational analyses demonstrated that the gamification elements “Sharing Knowledge”, “Supportive Updates”, “Rotating Leadership” and “Leaderboard” were most strongly related to the “Philanthropist” player type. We conclude with recommendations for designing personalized multiplayer mobile exergames.
- Amir Zaib Abbasi, Ding Hooi Ting, and Helmut Hlavacs. 2017. Engagement in games: Developing an instrument to measure consumer videogame engagement and its validation. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2017, (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7363925Google Scholar
- Amir Zaib Abbasi, Ding Hooi Ting, Helmut Hlavacs, Liliana Vale Costa, and Ana Isabel Veloso. 2019. An empirical validation of consumer video game engagement: A playful-consumption experience approach. Entertain. Comput. 29, (2019), 43–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.12.002Google Scholar
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Pascal Lessel, Subhashini Jantwal, Linda Muller, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krüger. 2021. Potential and effects of personalizing gameful fitness applications using behavior change intentions and Hexad user types. User Model. User-adapt. Interact. (2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-021-09288-6Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Pascal Lessel, Linda Muller, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Combining behavior change intentions and user types to select suitable gamification elements for persuasive fitness systems. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 11433 LNCS, (2019), 337–349. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_27Google Scholar
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Gustavo F. Tondello, Antonio Krüger, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2020. HexArcade: Predicting Hexad User Types By Using Gameful Applications. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play (CHI Play 2020) (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414232Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philip Bourke, David Murphy, John O'Mullane, Kevin Marshall, and Stephen Howell. 2018. Review of Player Personality Classifications to Inform Game Design. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM), IEEE, 1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2018.8516513Google Scholar
- Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Wolfgang Hochleitner, Christina Hochleitner, Michael Lankes, Peter Fröhlich, Rita Orji, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Using Player Type Models for Personalized Game Design - An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Interact. Des. Archit. (2016), 145–163.Google Scholar
- Karina Caro, Yuanyuan Feng, Timothy Day, Evan Freed, Boyd Fox, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Understanding the Effect of Existing Positive Relationships on a Social Motion-based Game for Health. (2018), 77–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240942Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gerry Chan, Ali Arya, Rita Orji, Zhao Zhao, Milica Stojmenovic, and Anthony Whitehead. 2020. Player Matching for Social Exergame Retention. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 198–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3383668.3419879Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu Chen and Pearl Pu. 2014. HealthyTogether: Exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applications. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. (2014), 25–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2592235.2592240Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ansgar E. Depping and Regan L. Mandryk. 2017. Cooperation and interdependence: How multiplayer games increase social closeness. CHI Play 2017 - Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play (2017), 449–461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116639Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filip Drozd, Tuomas Lehto, and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2012. Exploring perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system: A structural model. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 7284 LNCS, (2012), 157–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_14Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. J. Gajadhar, Y. A.W. De Kort, and W. A. IJsselsteijn. 2009. Rules of engagement: Influence of co-player presence on player involvement in digital games. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Simulations 1, 3 (2009), 14–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2009070102Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefan Göbel, Sandro Hardy, and Viktor Wendel. 2010. Serious Games for Health - Personalized Exergames. MM ’10 Proc. Int. Conf. Multimed. (2010), 1663–1666. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1874316Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee E.F. Graves, Nicola D. Ridgers, Greg Atkinson, and Gareth Stratton. 2010. The effect of active video gaming on children's physical activity, behavior preferences and body composition. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 22, 4 (2010), 535–546. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.22.4.535Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabian Groh. 2012. Gamification: State of the Art Definition and Utilization. Proc. 4th Semin. Res. Trends Media Informatics (2012), 39–46. Retrieved from http://vts.uni-ulm.de/docs/2012/7866/vts_7866_11380.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Sajanee Halko and Julie A. Kientz. 2010. Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 6137 LNCS, (2010), 150–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_16Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ella Horton, Daniel Johnson, and Jo Mitchell. 2016. Finding and Building Connections: Moving Beyond Skill- Based Matchmaking in Videogames. Proc. 28th Aust. Conf. Comput. Interact. - OzCHI ’16 (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3011857Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greet Van Hoye and Daniel B. Turban. 2015. Applicant-Employee Fit in Personality: Testing predictions from similarity-attraction theory and trait activation theory. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 23, 3 (2015), 210–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12109Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan Hwang, Adrian L.Jessup Schneider, Daniel Clarke, Alexander MacIntosh, Lauren Switzer, Darcy Fehlings, and T. C.Nicholas Graham. 2017. How game balancing affects play: Player adaptation in an exergame for children with cerebral palsy. DIS 2017 - Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Des. Interact. Syst. (2017), 699–710. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064664Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuan Jia, Yikun Liu, Xing Yu, and Stephen Voida. 2017. Designing Leaderboards for Gamification. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1949–1960. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025826Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Isabela Gasparini, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, and Juho Hamari. 2020. Tailored gamification: A review of literature. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 144, (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495Google Scholar
- Anthony M. Limperos and Mike Schmierbach. 2016. Understanding the Relationship Between Exergame Play Experiences, Enjoyment, and Intentions for Continued Play. Games Health J. 5, 2 (2016), 100–107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2015.0042Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jih-Hsuan Lin, Brian Winn, Wei Peng, and Karin a. Pfeiffer. 2012. Need Satisfaction Supportive Game Features as Motivational Determinants: An Experimental Study of a Self-Determination Theory Guided Exergame. Media Psychol. 15, 2 (2012), 175–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.673850Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth Lyons J., Deborah Tate F., Dianne Ward S., Kurt Ribisl M., J Bowling M., and Sriram Kalyanaraman. 2014. Engagement, Enjoyment, and Energy Expenditure During Active Video Game Play. Heal. Psychol. 33, 2 (2014), 174–181. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031947Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth J. Lyons. 2014. Cultivating Engagement and Enjoyment in Exergames Using Feedback, Challenge, and Rewards. Games Health J. 4, 1 (2014), 12–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0072Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrzej Marczewski. 2015. Gamification Mechanics and Elements.Google Scholar
- Arwen M. Marker and Amanda E. Staiano. 2015. Better Together: Outcomes of Cooperation Versus Competition in Social Exergaming. Games Health J. 4, 1 (2015), 25–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0066Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amir Matallaoui, Jonna Koivisto, Juho Hamari, and Ruediger Zarnekow. 2017. How Effective Is ÐExergamificationÓ? A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Gamification Features in Exergames. Proc. 50th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.402Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elke Mattheiss, Christina Hochleitner, Marc Busch, Rita Orji, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Deconstructing Pokémon Go – An Empirical Study on Player Personality Characteristics BT - Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 83–94.Google Scholar
- Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa. 1997. Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. Am. Psychol. 52, 5 (1997), 509–516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alberto Mora, Gustavo F. Tondello, Lennart E. Nacke, and Joan Arnedo-Moreno. 2018. Effect of personalized gameful design on student engagement. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), IEEE, 1925–1933. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363471Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian “Floyd” Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, and Frank Vetere. 2009. Design influence on social play in distributed exertion games. (2009), 1539. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518938Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, Frank Vetere, and Darren Edge. 2017. Designing for Bodily Interplay in Social Exertion Games. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 24, 3 (2017), 1–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064938Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, and Frank Vetere. 2010. Towards understanding how to design for social play in exertion games. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 14, 5 (2010), 417–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0268-xGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Lennart E. Nacke, and Chrysanne Di Marco. 2017. Towards Personality-driven Persuasive Health Games and Gamified Systems. (2017), 1015–1027. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025577Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Derek Reilly, Kiemute Oyibo, and Fidelia A. Orji. 2019. Deconstructing persuasiveness of strategies in behaviour change systems using the ARCS model of motivation. Behav. Inf. Technol. 38, 4 (2019), 319–335. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1520302Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rita Orji, Gustavo F. Tondello, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2018. Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Gustavo F. Tondello, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2018. Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2018-April, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott G. Owen, John C. Garne, J. Mark Loftin, Natalie Van Blerk, and Kevser Ermi. 2011. Changes in physical activity and fitness after 3 months of home wii fitTM use. J. Strength Cond. Res. 25, 11 (2011), 3191–3197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182132d55Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oyibo and Vassileva. 2019. Investigation of the Moderating Effect of Culture on Users’ Susceptibility to Persuasive Features in Fitness Applications. Information 10, 11 (November 2019), 344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/info10110344Google Scholar
- Mario Passalacqua, Sylvain Sénécal, Marc Frédette, Lennart Nacke, Robert Pellerin, and Pierre-Majorique Léger. 2020. A Motivational Perspective on the Personalization of Gamification. SIGHCI 2020 Proc. (2020).Google Scholar
- Ryan E. Rhodes, Mark R. Beauchamp, Chris M. Blanchard, Shannon S.D. Bredin, Darren E.R. Warburton, and Ralph Maddison. 2019. Predictors of stationary cycling exergame use among inactive children in the family home. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 41, (2019), 181–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.03.009Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Ryan Richard and L Deci Edward. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. Am. Psychol. 55, 1 (2000), 68–78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jens Riegelsberger, Scott Counts, Shelly D. Farnham, and Bruce C. Philips. 2007. Personality matters: Incorporating detailed user attributes and preferences into the matchmaking process. Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.434Google ScholarDigital Library
- RM Rigby, C. Scott, Ryan. 2011. Glued to games: how video games draw us in and hold us spellbound. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-0099Google Scholar
- Md Riyadh, Ali Arya, Gerry Chan, and Masud Imran. 2020. Enhancing Social Ties Through Manual Player Matchmaking in Online Multiplayer Games. (2020), 708–729. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_52Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2015. Pass the ball: Enforced turn-taking in activity tracking. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2015-April, (2015), 2417–2426. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702577Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Sailer, Jan Hense, Heinz Mandl, and Markus Klevers. 2014. Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Interact. Des. Archit. 19, 1 (2014), 28–37.Google Scholar
- Michael Sailer, Jan Ulrich Hense, Sarah Katharina Mayr, and Heinz Mandl. 2017. How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput. Human Behav. 69, (2017), 371–380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033Google ScholarDigital Library
- Felix D. Schönbrodt and Marco Perugini. 2013. At what sample size do correlations stabilize? J. Res. Pers. 47, 5 (2013), 609–612. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindsay A. Shaw, Jude Buckley, Paul M. Corballis, Christof Lutteroth, and Burkhard C. Wuensche. 2016. Competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, (2016), e92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.92Google Scholar
- Amanda E. Staiano, Robbie A. Beyl, Daniel S. Hsia, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, and Robert L. Newton. 2018. A 12-week randomized controlled pilot study of dance exergaming in a group: Influence on psychosocial factors in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology 12, 2 Special Issue (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-2-3Google Scholar
- Haichun Sun. 2012. Exergaming Impact on Physical Activity and Interest in Elementary School Children. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 83, 2 (2012), 212–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5641/027013612800745248Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jak Tan, Rahul Kumar, and Paul Ralph. 2016. Blending immersive gameplay with intense exercise using asynchronous exergaming. (2016), 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2896958.2896959Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth R. Tenney, Eric Turkheimer, and Thomas F. Oltmanns. 2009. Being liked is more than having a good personality: The role of matching. J. Res. Pers. 43, 4 (2009), 579–585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gustavo F. Tondello, Alberto Mora, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2019. Empirical validation of the Gamification User Types Hexad scale in English and Spanish. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, (2019), 95–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.002Google Scholar
- Gustavo F. Tondello, Alberto Mora, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2017. Elements of Gameful Design Emerging from User Preferences. (2017), 129–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116627Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gustavo F. Tondello, Rina R. Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2016. The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. (2016), 229–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khai N. Truong, Gillian R. Hayes, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2006. Storyboarding: An empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. Proc. Conf. Des. Interact. Syst. Process. Pract. Methods, Tech. DIS 2006, (2006), 12–21.Google Scholar
- Deneen Vojta, Michelle R. Lent, Deborah Sundal, Gary D. Foster, and Stewart G. Trost. 2014. Effects of a Pediatric Weight Management Program With and Without Active Video Games. JAMA Pediatr. 168, 5 (2014), 407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3436Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nannan Xi and Juho Hamari. 2019. Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 46, (2019), 210–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Georgios N. Yannakakis, Pieter Spronck, Daniele Loiacono, and Elisabeth André. 2013. Player Modeling. Dagstuhl Follow. (2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.4230/DFU.Vol6.12191.45Google Scholar
- Jeffrey Yim and T. C. Nicholas Graham. 2007. Using games to increase exercise motivation. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play - Future Play ’07, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328232Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhao Zhao, Ali Arya, Rita Orji, and Gerry Chan. 2020. Effects of a personalized fitness recommender system using gamification and continuous player modeling: System design and long-term validation study. JMIR Serious Games 8, 4 (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/19968Google Scholar
- Zhao Zhao, Ali Arya, Anthony Whitehead, Gerry Chan, and S. Ali Etemad. 2017. Keeping Users Engaged through Feature Updates. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025982Google ScholarDigital Library
- Personalizing Gameful Elements in Social Exergames: An Exploratory Study
Recommendations
Elements of Gameful Design Emerging from User Preferences
CHI PLAY '17: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlaySeveral studies have developed models to explain player preferences. These models have been developed for digital games; however, they have been frequently applied in gameful design (i.e., designing non-game applications with game elements) without ...
Personalizing Persuasive Strategies in Gameful Systems to Gamification User Types
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPersuasive gameful systems are effective tools for motivating behaviour change. Research has shown that tailoring these systems to individuals can increase their efficacy; however, there is little knowledge on how to personalize them. We conducted a ...
GardenQuest: Using Hexad Player Types to Design a Step-Based Multiplayer Persuasive Game for Motivating Physical Activity
Persuasive TechnologyAbstractExergames have the potential to reduce sedentary behavior and motivate physical activity. However, they suffer from retention problems mainly because the level of interest declines over time. In this paper, we report on the results of a social ...
Comments