skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3473635acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Discourse of Technological Innovation: A New Domain for Accountability

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

We argue that the discourse of technological innovation is a rhetorical space that demands accountability. We examine how the discourse can potentially marginalize users’ experiences and perpetuate assumptions about the role of technology to solve problems. We analyze three technological innovations reported in the mainstream press and the way the promotion of these innovations demonstrates a “grand” narrative of innovation discourse. These technologies are: Edison, a device to analyze human blood using a few drops; SignAloud, a glove to transliterate American Sign Language; and AlterEgo, a wearable device that allows people to communicate without vocalizing. We demonstrate how the grand narrative is characterized by four discursive patterns. The impact of the narrative, we argue, leads to an essentializing of users and their needs and the totalizing of the effects of the technology, which work to uphold technological paternalism. We end with a call to action and suggest ways to introduce accountability practices in the classroom and in journalistic and media coverage of technological innovation.

References

  1. Vivek Kumar. 2020. 5 Emerging technologies that will change the world in near future. Retrieved May 21, 2021 from https://industrywired.com/5-emerging-technologies-that-will-change-the-world-in-near-future/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jonathan D. Linton. 2009. De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation 29, 11 (November 2009), 729-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Julia M. Williams. 2004. Technological paternalism. ASEE Prism 14, 4, (November 2004), 72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Linda Tuhiwai Smith. 2021. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. 3rd edition. Zed Books. Brooklyn, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liz Hutter and Halcyon M. Lawrence. 2018. Promoting inclusive and accessible design in usability testing: a teaching case with users who are deaf. Communication Design Quarterly Review. 6, 2 (Summer 2018), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282665.3282668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR. 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press. Manhattan, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marilyn B. Nourse, Kate Engel, Samartha G. Anekal, Jocelyn A. Bailey, Pradeep Bhatta, Devayani P. Bhave, Shekar Chandrasekaran 2018. Engineering of a miniaturized, robotic clinical laboratory. Bioengineering and Translational Medicine 3, 1 (January 2018), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10084Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. AB Wire. 2016. Theranos to shut clinical labs and wellness centers. Retrieved February 12, 2021 from https://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2016/10/06/theranos-to-shut-clinical-labs-and-wellness-centers417991/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Caitlin Roper. 2014. This woman invented a way to run 30 lab tests on only one drop of blood. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2014/02/elizabeth-holmes-theranos/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Elizabeth Holmes. 2014. TEDMED talk. Retrieved from https://tedmed.com/talks/show?id=309114&videoId=497201&ref=about-this-speakerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas Pryor and Navid Azodi. n.d. Retrieved from http://lemelson.mit.edu/winners/thomas-pryor-and-navid-azodiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. UW News. 2016. UW undergraduate team wins $10,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for gloves that translate sign language. Retrieved from http://www.washington.edu/news/2016/04/12/uw-undergraduate-team-wins-10000-lemelson-mit-student-prize-for-gloves-that-translate-sign-language/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Will Wei. 2016. These gloves can convert sign language into spoken English.  Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/signaloud-gloves-translate-sign-language-2016-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Linguistics. 2016. Open letter to UW Office of News and Information on SignAloud project in media. Retrieved February 3, 2017 from http://depts.washington.edu/asluw/SignAloud-openletter.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas Pryor. 2016. Thomas Pryor discusses early prototype: SignAloud. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxrU96LQGWo  Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Arnav Kapur. 2019. How AI could become an extension of your mind. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/arnav_kapur_how_ai_could_become_an_extension_of_your_mind?language=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. MIT Media Lab. 2018. AlterEgo: Interfacing with devices through silent speech. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuUSc53Xpeg&list=PLj62-wQeg_DhMmXYoQFBBNcr3ZaixPB9CGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ashley Shew. 2020. Ableism, technoableism and future AI. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 39, 1 (March 2020), 40-50, 85. DOI:10.1109/MTS.2020.2967492Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Michael Erard, M. 2017. Why sign-language gloves don't help deaf people. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/11/why-sign-language-gloves-dont-help-deaf-people/545441/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jessica Maries Flores. 2016. Let's talk about SignAloud - Jessica Marie Flores. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBWu76gv3hoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Benjamin Mazer. 2018. Pathologists predicted the Theranos debacle but their voices were missing from most news coverage. Retrieved from https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2018/06/pathologists-predicted-the-theranos-debacle-but-their-voices-were-missing-from-most-news-coverage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ABC News 20/20. 2019. The Dropout. Retrieved on July 23, 2021 from https://abcnews.go.com/2020/video/ad-agency-notices-dramatic-claims-theranos-technology-part-61720773Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
    October 2021
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450386289
    DOI:10.1145/3472714

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format