skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3473651acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Building Community Coalitions for eCommerce: Client-based Learning and Web Development during a Pandemic Lockdown

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this experience report, I describe the process that allowed a coalition of interests to come together during the opening months of the global COVID-19 pandemic to provide economic relief for local businesses across the region that had been shuttered by lockdown orders; in particular, this report focuses on the kinds of advocacy necessary at various levels of the coalition: advocacy for developers and designers, for business owners, and for students. After narrating the genesis of the project and outlining its scope, I discuss problems related to client-based learning projects in web design, explain how the project structure sought to address and overcome these problems, and then present the results: i.e., what actually happened when we tried it and how it all ended up. Finally, the report discusses how this project has changed over time and concludes by reflecting on the nature of community coalitions.

References

  1. McEachern, Robert W. Problems in service learning and technical/professional writing: Incorporating the perspective of nonprofit management. Technical Communication Quarterly; Spring 2001; 10, 2; ProQuest Central pg. 211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakeslee, Ann M. Bridging the workplace and the academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom workplace collaborations. Technical Communication Quarterly; Spring 2001; 10, 2; ProQuest Central pg. 169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tovey, Janice. Building connections between industry and university: Implementing an internship at a regional university. Technical Communication Quarterly; Spring 2001; 10, 2; ProQuest Central pg. 225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sapp, David Alan and Robbin D. Crabtree. Laboratory in citizenship: Service learning in the technical communication classroom: Technical Communication Quarterly; Fall 2002; 11, 4; ProQuest Central pg. 411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Turnley, Melinda. Integrating Critical Approaches to Technology and Service-Learning Projects: Technical Communication Quarterly; Winter 2007; 16, 1; ProQuest Central pg. 103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Smith Taylor, Summer. Assessment in Client-Based Technical Writing Classes: Evolution of Teacher and Client Standards. Technical Communication Quarterly; Spring 2006; 15, 2; ProQuest Central pg. 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Walsh, Lynda. Constructive Interference: Wikis And service learning in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly; 2010; 19, 2; pg. 184. DOI: 10.1080/10572250903559381Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Youngblood, Susan A. and Jo Mackiewicz. Lessons in Service Learning: Developing the Service Learning Opportunities in Technical Communication (SLOT-C) Database. Technical Communication Quarterly; 2013; 22; pg. 260. DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2013.775542Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nielsen, Danielle. 2016. Facilitating Service Learning in the Online Technical Communication Classroom. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Vol. 46(2) 236–256. DOI: 10.1177/0047281616633600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bay, Jennifer. 2017. Training Technical and Professional Communication Educators for Online Internship Courses. Technical Communication Quarterly. VOL. 26, NO. 3, 329–343 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1339526Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Suzan Flanagan and Guiseppe Getto. 2017. Helping content: a three-part approach to content strategy with nonprofits. Communication Design Quarterly Review. 5, 1 (April 2017), 57–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3090152.3090157Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cozza, Vanessa. 2020. English 402: Technical and Professional Writing. Composition Studies 48.3 (2020): 103–115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Breanne Matheson and Emily January Petersen, “Engaging US Students in Culturally Aware Content Creation and Interactive Technology Design Through Service Learning,” in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 188-200, June 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2020.2982253Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lisa Dush, Guiseppe Getto, Suzan Flanagan, and R. J. Thompson. 2016. Content Strategy Service-Learning Partnerships with Nonprofit Organizations: A Guiding Heuristic and Overview of Deliverables. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2987592.2987628Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
    October 2021
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450386289
    DOI:10.1145/3472714

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format