skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3475817acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Robot Wrote This?: An Empirical Study of AI's Applications in Writing Practices

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines the emerging practice of using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to automatically generate content. Using the case study as methodology, this research aims to address the gap in the literature that little publication has been done in the field of technical and professional communication to investigate the wide applications of automated writing (AW) technologies. Composed of semi-structured interviews and a content assessment study, this project investigates how AW is embedded in the current writing practices in business, its effectiveness and potential impacts, and its strengths and drawbacks in comparison with human writers. The preliminary results of this study may provide advice for professional writers and technical communication programs on the core skills desired in the AW age.

References

  1. Tang, Y. (2020, October). Promoting User Advocacy through Design Thinking in the Age of Automated Writing. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 1-6).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bogost, I. (2008). The rhetoric of video games (pp. 117-40). MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. (2015). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetorics of software (p. 231). University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brown Jr, J. J., & Vee, A. (2016). Rhetoric special issue editorial introduction. Computational Culture, 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Omizo, R., Clark, I., Nguyen, M., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2019). Inventing Rhetorical Machines: On Facilitating Learning and Public Participation in Science. In Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics (pp. 110-136). University of Alabama Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones, J. & Hirsu, L. (2019) Introduction. In Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics. University of Alabama Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallagher, J. R. (2017). Writing for algorithmic audiences. Computers and Composition, 45, 25-35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Holmes, S. (2016). ‘Can We Name the Tools?’ Ontologies of Code, Speculative Techné and Rhetorical Concealment. Computational Culture, (5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Killoran, J. B. (2009). Targeting an audience of robots: Search engines and the marketing of technical communication business websites. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(3), 254-271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Laquintano, T., & Vee, A. (2017). How automated writing systems affect the circulation of political information online. Literacy in Composition Studies, 5(2), 43-62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ding, H., Ranade, N., & Cata, A. (2019, October). Boundary of content ecology: chatbots, user experience, heuristics, and pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (pp. 1-2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
    October 2021
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450386289
    DOI:10.1145/3472714

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format