skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3475818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Neuro-Positionality in User-Centered Design: The Case of Student Disability Services

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines the principles of universal design and neurodiversity theory as they interact during the onboarding processes of Student Disability Services departments. Finding fundamental conflicts between these two schools of thought, particularly in terms of self-identification and disability negotiation, I advance a novel framework of neuro-positionality in user-centered design.

References

  1. David J. Thomas and Dennis E. Gregory. 2013. A Comparative Cultural Analysis of Student Disability Services: A Case Study of Universities in the United States and Hong Kong. The Journal of the World Universities Forum, 5(3), 63-72. doi:10.18848/1835-2030/cgp/v05i03/56802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sarah Ardell, Peter Beug, and Kayla Hrudka. 2016. Perceived Stress Levels and Support of Student Disability Services. University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal, 2(2). doi:10.32396/usurj.v2i2.150Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kevin L. Crow. 2006. Accommodating On-line Postsecondary Students Who Have Disabilities. PhD dissertation, Northern Illinois University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rebecca Arzola. 2016. Collaboration Between the Library and Office of Student Disability Services: Document Accessibility in Higher Education. Digital Library Perspectives, 32(2), 117-126. doi:10.1108/dlp-09-2015-0016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nilda A. Sanchez-Rodriguez and Joseph LoGiudice. 2018. Building Bridges: Fostering Dynamic Partnerships Between the Library Department and Office of Student Disability Services in Higher Education. Journal of Access Services, 15(4), 142-160. doi:10.1080/15367967.2018.1520640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Susanne Bruyère. 2008. Total access: Making college web sites accessible to students with disabilities. Community College Journal, 79(1), 36-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leah Heilig. 2020. Ways to Move, Ways to Map: Neurodiversity in Interaction Design. PhD dissertation, Texas Tech University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Joey Benedek and Trish Miner. 2002. Measuring Desirability: New Methods for Evaluating Desirability in a Usability Lab Setting. In Usability Professionals' Association Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Richard H. Godden and Jonathan Hsy. Universal Design and Its Discontents. In Disrupting the Digital Humanities. Punctum Books, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ann Jurecic. 2007. Neurodiversity. College English, 69(5), 421-442. doi:10.2307/25472229Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Francisco Ortega. 2009. The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity. BioSocieties, 4(4), 425-445. doi:10.1017/s1745855209990287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Natasha N. Jones, Kristen R. Moore, and Rebecca Walton. 2016. Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211-229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Neuro-Positionality in User-Centered Design: The Case of Student Disability Services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2021
      402 pages
      ISBN:9781450386289
      DOI:10.1145/3472714

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format