skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3475825acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stay Healthy, Safe, and Well: Investigating Effective Communication Design in COVID-19 Emails and Messaging

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This case study investigates design strategies found within messages sent from post-secondary leaders during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. It seeks to answer how post-secondary leaders engage digital design strategies in emails to build community, promote public health recommendations, and foster empathy. Guided by a critical-contextual methodology and analysis of thematic codes, a preliminary content analysis indicates some leaders leverage critical design and language techniques to communicate complicated or difficult medical and crisis information while also balancing a concern for humanity.

References

  1. Rob Grace and Jason Tham. 2020. Adapting Uncertainty Reduction Theory for Crisis Communication: Guidelines for Technical Communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35 (1), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kirk St. Amant. 2020. Creating Scripts for Crisis Communication: COVID-19 and Beyond. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35 (1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Huiling Ding. 2009. Rhetorics of Alternative Media in an Emerging Epidemic: SARS, Censorship, and Participatory Risk Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250903149548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Huiling Ding. 2013. Transcultural Risk Communication and Viral Discourses: Grassroots Movements to Manage Global Risks of H1N1 Flu Pandemic. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22:2, 126-149, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.746628Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cynthia Chew and Gunther Eysenbach. 2010. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets During the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PloS one, 5(11), e14118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. William Leiss and Douglas Powell. 2004. Mad cows and mother's milk: The perils of poor risk communication. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles Rosenberg. 1992. Explaining epidemics and Other Studies in the History of Medicine. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shari Veil and Rebekah Husted. 2012. Best Practices as an Assessment for Crisis Communication. Journal of Communication Management, 16(2), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211217560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Johnny Saldaña. 2012. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huiling Ding. 2014. Rhetoric of a Global Epidemic: Transcultural Communication about SARS. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Huiling Ding. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
    October 2021
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450386289
    DOI:10.1145/3472714

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format