skip to main content
10.1145/3472714.3475826acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining the Digital Labor of Mental Health Communication on Social Media

Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mental health messaging on social media can increase awareness of the stigma surrounding mental illnesses while also creating powerful communities of support. Professionals within nonprofits work regularly with social media, yet the types of digital labor involved in social media communication practices are understudied. This poster discusses preliminary results from two qualitative case studies. The case studies examine professionals working within a mental health advocacy nonprofit as they engage in the digital labor of mental health communication design. Overall, results demonstrate that while funding may influence the content and work behind mental health messaging in different ways, professionals in this context are skilled in employing affective labor to show care for social media audiences.

References

  1. Amanda Reid and Pablo Miño. 2021. When therapy goes public: Copyright gatekeepers and sharing therapeutic artifacts on social media. International Journal of Communication 15, 950-969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Toni Ferro and Mark Zachry. 2014. Technical communication unbound: Knowledge work, social media, and emergent communicative practices. Technical Communication Quarterly 23, 1, 6-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Mark A. Hannah and Chris Lam. 2017. Drawing from available means: Assessing the rhetorical dimensions of Facebook practice. International Journal of Business Communication 54, 3, 235-257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Emily January Petersen. 2016. Empathetic user design: Understanding and living the reality of an audience. Communication Design Quarterly 42, 2, 23-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jennifer Roth Miller, Brandy Dieterle, Jennifer deWinter, and Stephanie Vie. 2020. Social media in professional, technical, and scientific programs: A heuristic to guide future use. Communication Design Quarterly 8,1, 19-34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peter Cannon, Katie Walkup, and Joshua M. Rea. 2016. mHeal and mHealth in a restricted environment: Design and usability of an offline mental health literacy app. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication. ACM, Silver Spring, MD, 1-3. https://doi-org.ezp1.lib.umn.edu/10.1145/2987592.2987613Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Drew Holladay. 2017. Classified conversations: Psychiatry and tactical technical communication in online spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly 26, 1, 8-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rebecca Walton, Natasha Jones, and Kristen Moore. 2019. Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Christian Fuchs. 2018. Capitalism, patriarchy, slavery, and racism in the age of digital capitalism and digital labour. Critical Sociology, 44, 4, 677-702.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Brooke Erin Duffy and Becca Schwartz. 2018 Digital “women's work?”: Job recruitment ads and the feminization of social media employment. New Media & Society, 20, 8, 2972-2989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Robert K. Yin. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '21: Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
    October 2021
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450386289
    DOI:10.1145/3472714

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format