skip to main content
10.1145/3472749.3474813acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tilt-Explore: Making Tilt Gestures Usable for Low-Vision Smartphone Users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with low vision interact with smartphones using assistive technologies like screen magnifiers, which provide built-in touch gestures to pan and zoom onscreen content. These gestures are often cumbersome and require bimanual interaction. Of particular interest is panning gestures, which are issued frequently, which involve 2- or 3-finger dragging. This paper aims to utilize tilt-based interaction as a single-handed alternative to built-in panning gestures. To that end, we first identified our design space from the literature and conducted an exploratory user study with 12 low-vision participants to understand key challenges. Among many findings, the study revealed that built-in panning gestures are error-prone, and most tilt-based interaction techniques are designed for sighted users, which low vision users struggle to use as-is. We addressed these challenges by adapting low-vision users’ interaction behavior and proposed Tilt-Explore, a new screen magnifier mode that enables tilt-to-pan. A second study with 16 low-vision participants revealed that, compared to built-in gestures, the participants were significantly less error-prone; and for lower magnification scale (e.g., <4x), they were significantly more efficient with Tilt-Explore. These findings indicate Tilt-Explore is a promising alternative to built-in panning gestures.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1154-video_preview.mp4

mp4

33.3 MB

References

  1. 2020. AccessibilityServiceInfo – Android Developers. Retrieved October 8, 2020 from https://developer.android.com/reference/android/accessibilityservice/AccessibilityServiceInfo#attr_android:canRequestTouchExplorationModeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. Android Magnification. https://support.google.com/accessibility/android/answer/6006949?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2020. Magnification – Android Accessibility Help. Retrieved October 8, 2020 from https://support.google.com/accessibility/android/answer/6006949?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2020. Speed Reading Facts. https://secure.execuread.com/facts/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2020. Zoom in on the iPhone screen. Retrieved October 8, 2020 from https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/zoom-iph3e2e367e/iosGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. AFB. 2020. Glossary of Eye Conditions. http://www.afb.org/info/living-with-vision-loss/eye-conditions/12#LGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. Agarwal and W. Stuerzlinger. 2013. WidgetLens: a system for adaptive content magnification of widgets. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. British Computer Society, 2578052, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Android. 2018. Android Sensor Manager. https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/SensorManager. (Accessed on 09/19/2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Android. 2019. Android Sensors. https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/sensors/sensors_overview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Apple Inc. 2020. Use AssistiveTouch on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202658[Online; accessed 01-Oct-2020].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeff Avery, Sylvain Malacria, Mathieu Nancel, Géry Casiez, and Edward Lank. 2018. Introducing Transient Gestures to Improve Pan and Zoom on Touch Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 25, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173599Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ravin Balakrishnan and I. Scott MacKenzie. 1997. Performance Differences in the Fingers, Wrist, and Forearm in Computer Input Control. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258764Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sandra Bardot, Anke Brock, Marcos Serrano, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2014. Quick-glance and In-depth Exploration of a Tabletop Map for Visually Impaired People. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on L’Interaction Homme-Machine(IHM ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670444.2670465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Joel F. Bartlett. 2000. Rock ’n’ Scroll Is Here to Stay. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 20, 3 (2000), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.844371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Patrick Baudisch, Edward Cutrell, Dan Robbins, Mary Czerwinski, Peter Tandler, Benjamin Bederson, and Alex Zierlinger. Year. Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch-and pen-operated systems. In Proceedings of INTERACT, Vol. 3. 57–64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Benjamin B. Bederson and James D. Hollan. 1994. Pad++: a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 192435, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/192426.192435Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. Making the web easier to see with opportunistic accessibility improvement. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 2647357, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Syed Masum Billah, Vikas Ashok, Donald E. Porter, and I.V. Ramakrishnan. 2017. Speed-Dial: A Surrogate Mouse for Non-Visual Web Browsing. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 3132531, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132531Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Syed Masum Billah, Vikas Ashok, Donald E. Porter, and I.V. Ramakrishnan. 2018. SteeringWheel: A Locality-Preserving Magnification Interface for Low Vision Web Browsing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3173594, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Renaud Blanch, Yves Guiard, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 985758, 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985758Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Blenkhorn and D. G. Evans. 2006. A Screen Magnifier Using ”High Level” Implementation Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14, 4(2006), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.886728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. P. Blenkhorn, D. G. Evans, and A. Baude. 2002. Full-screen magnification for windows using DirectX overlays. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 10, 4(2002), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2002.806835Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189 (1996), 194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Maria Claudia Buzzi, Marina Buzzi, Barbara Leporini, and Amaury Trujillo. 2015. Exploring Visually Impaired People’s Gesture Preferences for Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter. ACM, 2808448, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808435.2808448Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Youli Chang, Sehi L’Yi, Kyle Koh, and Jinwook Seo. 2015. Understanding Users’ Touch Behavior on Large Mobile Touch-Screens and Assisted Targeting by Tilting Gesture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1499–1508. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702425Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wenzhe Cui, Suwen Zhu, Zhi Li, Zheer Xu, Xing-Dong Yang, Iv Ramakrishnan, and Xiaojun Bi. 2021. BackSwipe: Back-of-device Word-Gesture Interaction on Smartphones. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445081Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Julie Fraser and Carl Gutwin. 2000. A framework of assistive pointers for low vision users. In Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies. ACM, 354329, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/354324.354329Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. George W. Furnas and Benjamin B. Bederson. 1995. Space-Scale Diagrams: Understanding Multiscale Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223934Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Grandjean and H. Oldroyd. 1980. Fitting the Task to the Man: An Ergonomic Approach. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?id=CFtRAAAAMAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tovi Grossman and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2005. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor’s activation area. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1055012, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yves Guiard. 2013. Asymmetric Division of Labor in Human Skilled Bimanual Action. Journal of Motor Behavior 19 (08 2013), 486–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1987.10735426Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yves Guiard, Renaud Blanch, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, 1006060, 9–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Elyse C. Hallett, Wayne Dick, Tom Jewett, and Kim-Phuong L. Vu. 2018. How Screen Magnification with and Without Word-Wrapping Affects the User Experience of Adults with Low Vision. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_63Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Beverly L. Harrison, Kenneth P. Fishkin, Anuj Gujar, Carlos Mochon, and Roy Want. 1998. Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! An exploration of manipulative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 274647, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274647Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ken Hinckley, Jeff Pierce, Mike Sinclair, and Eric Horvitz. 2000. Sensing Techniques for Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/354401.354417Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ken Hinckley and Hyunyoung Song. 2011. Sensor Synaesthesia: Touch in Motion, and Motion in Touch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Juan Pablo Hourcade, Christopher M. Nguyen, Keith B. Perry, and Natalie L. Denburg. 2010. Pointassist for older adults: analyzing sub-movement characteristics to aid in pointing tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1753494, 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. https://developer.apple.com/. 2020. Adaptivity and Layout - Visual Design - iOS - Human Interface Guidelines - Apple Developer. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/ios/visual-design/adaptivity-and-layout/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Apple Inc.2021. Apple Previews Powerful Software Updates Designed for People with Disabilities. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/05/apple-previews-powerful-software-updates-designed-for-people-with-disabilities/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul Kabbash and William A. S. Buxton. 1995. The ”prince” technique: Fitts’ law and selection using area cursors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 223939, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Shaun K. Kane, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2008. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 1414487, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1414471.1414487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2011. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1979001, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Richard L. Kline and Ephraim P. Glinert. 1995. Improving GUI accessibility for people with low vision. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 223919, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223919Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. I Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. I. Scott MacKenzie and Robert J. Teather. 2012. FittsTilt: The Application of Fitts’ Law to Tilt-Based Interaction. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design(NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Material Design. 2020. Understanding layout - Material Design. https://material.io/design/layout/understanding-layout.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Stephania Medryk and I Scott MacKenzie. 2013. A comparison of accelerometer and touch-based input for mobile gaming. In International Conference on Multimedia and Human-Computer Interaction-MHCI 2013. 117–1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Alexander Ng, Stephen A. Brewster, and John H. Williamson. 2014. Investigating the Effects of Encumbrance on One- and Two- Handed Interactions with Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1981–1990. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. I. Oakley and S. O’Modhrain. 2005. Tilt to scroll: evaluating a motion based vibrotactile mobile interface. In First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference. 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2005.138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Kurt Partridge, Saurav Chatterjee, Vibha Sazawal, Gaetano Borriello, and Roy Want. 2002. TiltType: Accelerometer-Supported Text Entry for Very Small Devices. UIST (User Interface Software and Technology): Proceedings of the ACM Symposium, 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/571985.572013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin Pielot, Benjamin Poppinga, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2011. A tactile compass for eyes-free pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part II. Springer-Verlag, 2042179, 640–656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Mahfuz Rahman, Sean Gustafson, Pourang Irani, and Sriram Subramanian. 2009. Tilt Techniques: Investigating the Dexterity of Wrist-based Input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1943–1952. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jun Rekimoto. 1996. Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 237115, 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1145/237091.237115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. RotoView. [n. d.]. Smart Scroll Technology for Smartphones and Other Handheld Devices. http://rotoview.com/index.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jaime Ruiz and Yang Li. 2011. DoubleFlip: a motion gesture delimiter for mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1979341, 2717–2720. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Jaime Ruiz, Yang Li, and Edward Lank. 2011. User-defined motion gestures for mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1978971, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sonja Rümelin, Enrico Rukzio, and Robert Hardy. 2011. NaviRadar: a novel tactile information display for pedestrian navigation. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 2047234, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Samsung. [n. d.]. How do I use Motion and Gestures to control my Samsung Galaxy S4?https://www.samsung.com/us/support/answer/ANS00043991/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. David Small and Hiroshi Ishii. 1997. Design of spatially aware graspable displays. In CHI ’97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1120437, 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120437Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee Stearns, Victor DeSouza, Jessica Yin, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2017. Augmented Reality Magnification for Low Vision Users with the Microsoft Hololens and a Finger-Worn Camera. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Sarit Felicia Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. How People with Low Vision Access Computing Devices: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 2982168, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982168Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Robert J. Teather and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2014. Position vs. Velocity Control for Tilt-based Interaction. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2014(GI ’14). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 51–58. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2619648.2619658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Robert J. Teather, Andrew Roth, and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2017. Tilt-Touch synergy: Input control for “dual-analog” style mobile games. Entertainment Computing 21 (2017), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Mary Frances Theofanos and Janice Redish. 2005. Helping Low-vision and Other Users with Web Sites That Meet Their Needs: Is One Site for All Feasible?Technical Communication 52, 1 (2005), 9–20. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2005/00000052/00000001/art00002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Theophanis Tsandilas, Caroline Appert, Anastasia Bezerianos, and David Bonnet. 2014. Coordination of Tilt and Touch in One- and Two-handed Use. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2001–2004. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 1996. Use of Audio-Haptic Interface Techniques to Allow Nonvisual Access to Touchscreen Appliances. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 40, 24 (1996), 1266–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129604002430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Lars Weberg, Torbjörn Brange, and Åsa Wendelbo Hansson. 2001. A Piece of Butter on the PDA Display. In CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Daniel Wigdor and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2003. TiltText: Using Tilt for Text Input to Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/964696.964705Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Won Kim, F. Tendick, S. Ellis, and L. Stark. 1987. A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation 3, 5 (Oct. 1987), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRA.1987.1087117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Aileen Worden, Nef Walker, Krishna Bharat, and Scott Hudson. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 258724, 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Hui-Shyong Yeo, Xiao-Shen Phang, Steven J. Castellucci, Per Ola Kristensson, and Aaron Quigley. 2017. Investigating Tilt-based Gesture Keyboard Entry for Single-Handed Text Entry on Large Devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3025520, 4194–4202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Yuhang Zhao, Sarit Szpiro, Lei Shi, and Shiri Azenkot. 2019. Designing and Evaluating a Customizable Head-Mounted Vision Enhancement System for People with Low Vision. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 4, Article 15 (Dec. 2019), 46 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Zhengxuan Zhao, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Ting Zhang, and Gavriel Salvendy. 2009. Visual search-based design and evaluation of screen magnifiers for older and visually impaired users. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 8 (2009), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.03.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UIST '21: The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
    October 2021
    1357 pages
    ISBN:9781450386357
    DOI:10.1145/3472749

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

    UIST '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format