skip to main content
10.1145/3472771.3472775acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extending network slice management to the end-host

Published:23 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The network slicing concept of 5G aims to provide the flexibility and scalability required to support a wide array of vertical services. To coordinate the coexistence of network slices, and to guarantee that the required resources are available for each one of them, the 5G core employs a slicing management entity, a slice manager. In this paper, we propose an architecture where the network slicing concept is extended beyond the core and access networks to also include the configuration of the UE's network stack. We exploit the slice manager's global view on the network to feed fine-grained information on slice configuration, health, and status to the UE. This information, together with local policies on the UE, is then used to dynamically create services tailored to the requirements of individual applications. We implement this architecture in a 5G testbed, and show how it can be leveraged in order to enable optimized services through dynamic network protocol configuration, application-to-slice mapping, and network protocol selection.

References

  1. 3GPP. 2020. Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS) (Release 15). Technical Specification (TS) 23.501. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://www.3gpp.org/ftp//Specs/archive/23_series/23.501/23501-g60.zip Version 16.6.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 3GPP. 2021a. ; Network Exposure Function Northbound APIs; Stage 3, (Release 17). Technical Specification (TS) 29.522. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/22_series/22.261/22261-h60.zip Version 17.2.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3GPP. 2021b. Functional architecture and information flows to support Common API Framework for 3GPP Northbound APIs; Stage 2,(Release 17). Technical Specification (TS) 23.222. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/29_series/29.522/29522-h20.zip Version 17.5.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 3GPP. 2021c. Service Enabler Architecture Layer for Verticals (SEAL);Functional architecture and information flows; (Release 17). Technical Specification (TS) 23.434. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/23_series/23.434/23434-h20.zip Version 17.2.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 3GPP. 2021d. Service requirements for the 5G system; Stage 1 . Technical Specification (TS) 22.61. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/22_series/22.261/22261-h60.zip Version 17.6.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 3GPP. 2021e. Study on enhancement of Radio Access Network (RAN) slicing, Rel.17 . Technical Report (TR) 38.832. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3726 Version 1.0.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zdravko Bozakov, Simone Mangiante, Cristian Hernandez Benet, Anna Brunstrom, Ricardo Santos, Andreas Kassler, and Donagh Buckley. 2017. A NEAT framework for enhanced end-host integration in SDN environments. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN). IEEE, Berlin, Germany, 1–7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Maria Christopoulou, Georgios Xilouris, Athanasios Sarlas, Harilaos Koumaras, Michail-Alexandros Kourtis, and Themistoklis Anagnostopoulos. 2021. 5G Experimentation: The Experience of the Athens 5GENESIS Facility. In Proceedings of the 2021 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM '21). IEEE, Bordeaux, France, to–appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jerry Chu, Nandita Dukkipati, Yuchung Cheng, and Matt Mathis. 2013. Increasing TCP's Initial Window. RFC 6928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Monia Ghobadi, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh, and Yashar Ganjali. 2012. Rethinking End-to-End Congestion Control in Software-Defined Networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-XI). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Karl-Johan Grinnemo, Zdravko Bozakov, Anna Brunstrom, Maria Isabel Sanchez Bueno, Thomas Dreibholz, Kristian Rikter Evensen, Gorry Fairhurst, Audun Fosselie Hansen, David Hayes, Per Hurtig, Mohammad Rajiullah, Tom Jones, David Ros, Tomasz Rozensztrauch, Michael Tüxen, and Eric Vyncke. 2017. Deliverable D3.3 - Extended Transport System and Transparent Support of Non-NEAT Applications. Technical Report. NEAT. http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1273851Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jochen Gruen, Michael Karl, and Thorsten Herfet. 2013. Network supported congestion avoidance in software-defined networks. In 2013 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON). IEEE, Singapore, 1–6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. GSM Association (GSMA). 2020. Generic Network Slice Template. https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads//NG.116-v3.0-1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ankur Jain, Andreas Terzis, Hannu Flinck, Nurit Sprecher, Swaminathan Arunachalam, Kevin Smith, Vijay Devarapalli, and Roni Bar Yanai. 2017a. Mobile Throughput Guidance Inband Signaling Protocol. Internet-Draft draft-flinck-mobile-throughput-guidance-04. Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-flinck-mobile-throughput-guidance-04 Work in Progress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ankur Jain, Andreas Terzis, Nurit Sprecher, Swaminathan Arunachalam, Kevin Smith, and Guenter Klas. 2017b. Requirements and reference architecture for Mobile Throughput Guidance Exposure. Internet-Draft draft-sprecher-mobile-tg-exposure-req-arch-03. Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sprecher-mobile-tg-exposure-req-arch-03 Work in Progress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Simon Jouet, Colin Perkins, and Dimitrios Pezaros. 2016. OTCP: SDN-managed congestion control for data center networks. In NOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, 171–179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sebastian Kiesel, Wendy Roome, Richard Woundy, Stefano Previdi, Stanislav Shalunov, Richard Alimi, Reinaldo Penno, and Y. Richard Yang. 2014. Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol. RFC 7285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. NEAT. 2015. A New, Evolutive API and Transport-Layer Architecture for the Internet. https://www.neat-project.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Christoph Paasch, Simone Ferlin, Ozgu Alay, and Olivier Bonaventure. 2014. Experimental Evaluation of Multipath TCP Schedulers. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Capacity Sharing Workshop (CSWS '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dr. Craig Partridge, Mark Allman, and Sally Floyd. 2002. Increasing TCP's Initial Window. RFC 3390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tommy Pauly, Brian Trammell, Anna Brunstrom, Gorry Fairhurst, Colin Perkins, Philipp S. Tiesel, and Christopher A. Wood. 2021. An Architecture for Transport Services. Internet-Draft draft-ietf-taps-arch-10. Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-taps-arch-10 Work in Progress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dr. Vern Paxson, Mark Allman, and W. Richard Stevens. 1999. TCP Congestion Control. RFC 2581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. George Xilouris, Themistoklis Anagnostopoulos, Thanos Sarlas, Maria Christopoulou, Harilaos Koumaras, Stavros Kolometsos, Fotini Setaki, Ioanna Mesogiti, Dimitris Tsolkas, Florian Kaltenberger, Panagiotis Matzakos, Daniele Munaretto, Fabio Giust, and Israel Koffman. 2020. Deliverable 4.2: The Athens Platform (Release B). Technical Report. 5GENESIS. https://5genesis.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/5GENESIS_D4.2_v1.0.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Extending network slice management to the end-host

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            5G-MeMU '21: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on 5G Measurements, Modeling, and Use Cases
            August 2021
            40 pages
            ISBN:9781450386364
            DOI:10.1145/3472771

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 August 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader