skip to main content
10.1145/3473258.3473270acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expression and Prognosis of HER Family in Breast Cancer

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family belongs to the transmembrane protein receptor family of the tyrosine kinase I subfamily and has been determined to be closely related to the clinicopathological characteristics of various tumors and the poor prognosis of tumor patients. However, the different expression patterns of the four HER family genes and their correlation with cancer immune infiltrate have not been analyzed. In this article, we analyzed the expression level of the HER family in breast cancer patients through Oncomine and Interactive Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles (GEPIA). We found that the expression levels of ERBB2 and ERBB3 in invasive breast cancer (BCRA) tissues were higher than those in normal breast tissues, while the expression levels of EGFR in the former were lower than those in the latter. Using the Tumor Immunity Estimation Resource (TIMER) database to study the correlation between the HER family and breast cancer immune infiltrates shows that the expression of the HER family is significantly associated with tumor purity and the level of infiltration of various immune cells. This study laid the foundation for further exploration of the molecular mechanism of the HER family in breast cancer.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin D, Piñeros M, Znaor A and Bray FJIjoc. 2019. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. 144: 1941-1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Velaei K, Samadi N, Barazvan B and Soleimani Rad JJB. 2016. Tumor microenvironment-mediated chemoresistance in breast cancer. 30: 92-100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Prat A, Parker J, Karginova O, Fan C, Livasy C, Herschkowitz J, He X and Perou CJBcrB. 2010. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. 12: R68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee W and Boyer TJL. 2001. BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer. S5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Balaji K, Subramanian B, Yadav P, Anu Radha C and Ramasubramanian V. 2016. Radiation therapy for breast cancer: Literature review. Med Dosim. 41: 253-257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, Ruddy K, Tsang J and Cardoso FJNrDp. 2019. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers.5: 66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ramakrishna N, Temin S, Chandarlapaty S, Crews J, Davidson N, Esteva F, Giordano S, Kirshner J, Krop I, Levinson J, Modi S, Patt D, Perlmutter J, Winer E and Lin NJJocoojotASoCO. 2018. Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. 36: 2804-2807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Finigan JH, Downey GP and Kern JA. 2012. Human epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 47: 395-404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wee P and Wang Z. 2017. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Proliferation Signaling Pathways. Cancers (Basel) 9:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Roskoski R, Jr. 2014. The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol Res. 79: 34-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nuciforo P, Radosevic-Robin N, Ng T and Scaltriti M. 2015. Quantification of HER family receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 17: 53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Khelwatty SA, Essapen S, Bagwan I, Green M, Seddon AM and Modjtahedi H. 2014. Co-expression of HER family members in patients with Dukes' C and D colon cancer and their impacts on patient prognosis and survival. PLoS One 9: e91139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yamaguchi H, Chang SS, Hsu JL and Hung MC. 2014. Signaling cross-talk in the resistance to HER family receptor targeted therapy. Oncogene. 33: 1073-1081.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Carrasco-García E, Saceda M and Martínez-Lacaci I. 2014. Role of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands in glioblastoma. Cells. 3: 199-235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. King CR, Kraus MH and Aaronson SA. 1985. Amplification of a novel v-erbB-related gene in a human mammary carcinoma. Science. 229: 974-976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Harari D and Yarden Y. 2000. Molecular mechanisms underlying ErbB2/HER2 action in breast cancer. Oncogene. 19: 6102-6114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Luhtala S, Staff S, Kallioniemi A, Tanner M and Isola J. 2018. Clinicopathological and prognostic correlations of HER3 expression and its degradation regulators, NEDD4-1 and NRDP1, in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 18: 1045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sartor CI, Zhou H, Kozlowska E, Guttridge K, Kawata E, Caskey L, Harrelson J, Hynes N, Ethier S, Calvo B and Earp HS, 3rd. 2001. Her4 mediates ligand-dependent antiproliferative and differentiation responses in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 21: 4265-4275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Muraoka-Cook RS, Caskey LS, Sandahl MA, Hunter DM, Husted C, Strunk KE, Sartor CI, Rearick WA, Jr., McCall W, Sgagias MK, Cowan KH and Earp HS, 3rd. 2006. Heregulin-dependent delay in mitotic progression requires HER4 and BRCA1. Mol Cell Biol. 26: 6412-6424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rhodes DR, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Mahavisno V, Varambally R, Yu J, Briggs BB, Barrette TR, Anstet MJ, Kincead-Beal C, Kulkarni P, Varambally S, Ghosh D and Chinnaiyan AM. 2007. Oncomine 3.0: genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles. Neoplasia. 9: 166-180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C and Zhang Z. 2017. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: W98-w102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce-Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi B and Varambally. 2017. S. UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses. Neoplasia. 19: 649-658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Thul PJ, Åkesson L, Wiking M, Mahdessian D, Geladaki A, Ait Blal H, Alm T, Asplund A, Björk L, Breckels LM, Bäckström A, Danielsson F, Fagerberg L, Fall J, Gatto L, Gnann C, Hober S, Hjelmare M, Johansson F, Lee S, Lindskog C, Mulder J, Mulvey CM, Nilsson P, Oksvold P, Rockberg J, Schutten R, Schwenk JM, Sivertsson Å, Sjöstedt E, Skogs M, Stadler C, Sullivan DP, Tegel H, Winsnes C, Zhang C, Zwahlen M, Mardinoglu A, Pontén F, von Feilitzen K, Lilley KS, Uhlén M and Lundberg E. 2017. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science. 356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. 2012. Nature. 490: 61-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Li T, Fan J, Wang B, Traugh N, Chen Q, Liu JS, Li B and Liu XS. 2017. TIMER: A Web Server for Comprehensive Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells. Cancer Res. 77: e108-e110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sergina NV and Moasser MM. 2007. The HER family and cancer: emerging molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Trends Mol Med. 13: 527-534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Howe LR and Brown PH. 2017. Targeting the HER/EGFR/ErbB family to prevent breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 4: 1149-1157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yang L, Li Y, Bhattacharya A and Zhang Y. 2019. A recombinant human protein targeting HER2 overcomes drug resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinelli E, De Palma R, Orditura M, De Vita F and Ciardiello F. 2009. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Clin Exp Immunol. 158: 1-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kaumaya PT and Foy KC. 2012. Peptide vaccines and targeting HER and VEGF proteins may offer a potentially new paradigm in cancer immunotherapy. Future Oncol. 8: 961-987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sakhdari A, Hutchinson L and Cosar E F. 2015. Molecular Pathology of HER Family of Oncogenes in Breast Cancer: HER-2 Evaluation and Role in Targeted Therapy. Springer New York. 119-136Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ueno N and Zhang DJJoC. 2011. Targeting EGFR in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. 2: 324-328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakai K, Hung MC and Yamaguchi H. 2016. A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 6: 1609-1623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Masuda H, Zhang D, Bartholomeusz C, Doihara H, Hortobagyi GN and Ueno NT. 2012. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 136: 331-345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sanders SH, Brena SF, Spier CJ, Beltrutti D, McConnell H and Quintero O. 1992. Chronic low back pain patients around the world: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain. 8: 317-323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Al-Kuraya K, Schraml P, Torhorst J, Tapia C, Zaharieva B, Novotny H, Spichtin H, Maurer R, Mirlacher M, Köchli O, Zuber M, Dieterich H, Mross F, Wilber K, Simon R and Sauter G. 2004. Prognostic relevance of gene amplifications and coamplifications in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 64: 8534-8540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Seshacharyulu P, Ponnusamy MP, Haridas D, Jain M, Ganti AK and Batra SK. 2012. Targeting the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 16: 15-31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ali R and Wendt MK. 2017. The paradoxical functions of EGFR during breast cancer progression. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2: 16042-.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kauraniemi P and Kallioniemi A. 2006. Activation of multiple cancer-associated genes at the ERBB2 amplicon in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 13: 39-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Harbeck N. 2018. Advances in targeting HER2-positive breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 30: 55-59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Marchese A. 2006. Assessment of degradation and ubiquitination of CXCR4, a GPCR regulated by EGFR family members. Methods Mol Biol. 327: 139-145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ballard M, Jalikis F, Krings G, Schmidt RA, Chen YY, Rendi MH, Dintzis SM, Jensen KC, West RB, Sibley RK, Troxell ML and Allison KH. 2017. 'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study. Mod Pathol. 30: 227-235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Pernas S, Barroso-Sousa R and Tolaney SM. 2018. Optimal treatment of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 124: 4455-4466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, Procter M, Goldhirsch A, de Azambuja E, Castro G, Jr., Untch M, Smith I, Gianni L, Baselga J, Al-Sakaff N, Lauer S, McFadden E, Leyland-Jones B, Bell R, Dowsett M and Jackisch C. 2017. 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet. 389: 1195-1205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Du F, Yuan P, Zhao ZT, Yang Z, Wang T, Zhao JD, Luo Y, Ma F, Wang JY, Fan Y, Cai RG, Zhang P, Li Q, Song YM and Xu BH. 2016. A miRNA-based signature predicts development of disease recurrence in HER2 positive breast cancer after adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment. Sci Rep. 6: 33825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Kodack DP, Askoxylakis V, Ferraro GB, Sheng Q, Badeaux M, Goel S, Qi X, Shankaraiah R, Cao ZA, Ramjiawan RR, Bezwada D, Patel B, Song Y, Costa C, Naxerova K, Wong CSF, Kloepper J, Das R, Tam A, Tanboon J, Duda DG, Miller CR, Siegel MB, Anders CK, Sanders M, Estrada MV, Schlegel R, Arteaga CL, Brachtel E, Huang A, Fukumura D, Engelman JA and Jain RK. 2017. The brain microenvironment mediates resistance in luminal breast cancer to PI3K inhibition through HER3 activation. Sci Transl Med. 9:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sassen A, Rochon J, Wild P, Hartmann A, Hofstaedter F, Schwarz S and Brockhoff G. 2008. Cytogenetic analysis of HER1/EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 in 278 breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 10: R2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Lyu H, Han A, Polsdofer E, Liu S and Liu B. 2018. Understanding the biology of HER3 receptor as a therapeutic target in human cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B. 8: 503-510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Wehrenberg-Klee E, Turker NS, Heidari P, Larimer B, Juric D, Baselga J, Scaltriti M and Mahmood U. 2016. Differential Receptor Tyrosine Kinase PET Imaging for Therapeutic Guidance. J Nucl Med. 57: 1413-1419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Longo JF, Brosius SN, Black L, Worley SH, Wilson RC, Roth KA and Carroll SL. 2019. ErbB4 promotes malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor pathogenesis via Ras-independent mechanisms. Cell Commun Signal. 17: 74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Dey N, Williams C, Leyland-Jones B and De P. 2015. A critical role for HER3 in HER2-amplified and non-amplified breast cancers: function of a kinase-dead RTK. Am J Transl Res. 7: 733-750.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruiz-Saenz A, Dreyer C, Campbell MR, Steri V, Gulizia N and Moasser MM. 2018. HER2 Amplification in Tumors Activates PI3K/Akt Signaling Independent of HER3. Cancer Res. 78: 3645-3658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Khalil HS, Langdon SP, Kankia IH, Bown J and Deeni YY. 2016. NRF2 Regulates HER2 and HER3 Signaling Pathway to Modulate Sensitivity to Targeted Immunotherapies. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016: 4148791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Xiao Y, Li Y, Tao H, Humphries B, Li A, Jiang Y, Yang C, Luo R and Wang Z. 2018. Integrin α5 down-regulation by miR-205 suppresses triple negative breast cancer stemness and metastasis by inhibiting the Src/Vav2/Rac1 pathway. Cancer Lett. 433: 199-209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Wang J, Yin J, Yang Q, Ding F, Chen X, Li B and Tian X. 2016. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (HER4) is a favorable prognostic marker of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 7: 76693-76703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Naresh A, Long W, Vidal GA, Wimley WC, Marrero L, Sartor CI, Tovey S, Cooke TG, Bartlett JM and Jones FE. 2006. The ERBB4/HER4 intracellular domain 4ICD is a BH3-only protein promoting apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66: 6412-6420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Kim JY, Jung HH, Do IG, Bae S, Lee SK, Kim SW, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Ahn JS, Park YH and Im YH. 2016. Prognostic value of ERBB4 expression in patients with triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 16: 138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Canfield K, Li J, Wilkins OM, Morrison MM, Ung M, Wells W, Williams CR, Liby KT, Vullhorst D, Buonanno A, Hu H, Schiff R, Cook RS and Kurokawa M. 2015. Receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB4 mediates acquired resistance to ERBB2 inhibitors in breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 14: 648-655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBBT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology
    May 2021
    293 pages
    ISBN:9781450389655
    DOI:10.1145/3473258

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format