skip to main content
10.1145/3473258.3473293acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

in Silico Analysis to Map Epitope to Paratope Residues of Anti-PD-L1 Antibody BMS-936559

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The inhibitors targeting the programmed death receptor–1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) pathway are the most promising approaches for cancer treatment. BMS-936559 is a fully human IgG4 antibody blocking PD-L1. Although the crystal structure of the BMS-936559/PD-L1 complex was reported in 2016, providing us the complex interface at atom level, it was just a frozen structure and some key interaction residues might be missed. Thus, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is used to map the epitope to paratope residues for BMS-936559 dynamically. Two residues, including PD-L1ASP49 on PD-L1 and TYR32L on the light chain of BMS-936559, were newly sorted out in simulations and there are altogether eight residues predicted critical in the complex interface, including PD-L1ASP49, PD-L1TYR56, PD-L1GLU58, PD-L1HIS69 on PD-L1, and LYS57H, HIS59H, SER106H, TYR32L on both heavy and light chains of BMS-936559.

References

  1. Guo, Z. S. The 2018 Nobel Prize in medicine goes to cancer immunotherapy (editorial for BMC cancer). BMC Cancer, 18, 1 (Nov 12 2018), 1086.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellmunt, J., Powles, T. and Vogelzang, N. J. A review on the evolution of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for bladder cancer: The future is now. Cancer Treat Rev, 54(Mar 2017), 58-67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hotchkiss, R. S., Colston, E., Yende, S., Angus, D. C., Moldawer, L. L., Crouser, E. D., Martin, G. S., Coopersmith, C. M., Brakenridge, S. and Mayr, F. B. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Sepsis: A Phase 1b Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study of Antiprogrammed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Antibody (BMS-936559)*. Critical Care Medicine, 472019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee, J. Y., Lee, H. T., Shin, W., Chae, J., Choi, J., Kim, S. H., Lim, H., Won Heo, T., Park, K. Y., Lee, Y. J., Ryu, S. E., Son, J. Y., Lee, J. U. and Heo, Y. S. Structural basis of checkpoint blockade by monoclonal antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun, 7(Oct 31 2016), 13354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fang, X., Fang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, G. and Wu, J. Mapping paratope on antithrombotic antibody 6B4 to epitope on platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha via molecular dynamic simulations. PLoS One, 7, 7 2012), e42263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu, G., Fang, Y. and Wu, J. A mechanism for localized dynamics-driven affinity regulation of the binding of von Willebrand factor to platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha. J Biol Chem, 288, 37 (Sep 13 2013), 26658-26667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu, W., Liu, G., Zhou, H., Fang, X., Fang, Y. and Wu, J. Computer prediction of paratope on antithrombotic antibody 10B12 and epitope on platelet glycoprotein VI via molecular dynamics simulation. Biomed Eng Online, 15, Suppl 2 (Dec 28 2016), 152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, W., Jin, H., Chen, T., Zhang, G., Lai, S. and Liu, G. Investigating the Role of the N-Terminal Loop of PD-1 in Binding Process Between PD-1 and Nivolumab via Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Front Mol Biosci, 72020), 574759.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, W., Huang, B., Kuang, Y. and Liu, G. Molecular dynamics simulations elucidate conformational selection and induced fit mechanisms in the binding of PD-1 and PD-L1. Mol Biosyst, 13, 5 (May 2 2017), 892-900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Liu, W. and Liu, G. Mapping Paratope and Epitope Residues of Antibody Pembrolizumab via Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Springer, City, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bordoli, L., Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Benkert, P., Battey, J. and Schwede, T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nature Protocols, 4, 1 2009), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Biasini, M., Bienert, S., Waterhouse, A., Arnold, K., Studer, G., Schmidt, T., Kiefer, F., Cassarino, T. G., Bertoni, M. and Bordoli, L. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, w1 2014), 252-258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kale, L. and Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem, 26, 16 (Dec 2005), 1781-1802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. MacKerell, A. D., Jr., Feig, M. and Brooks, C. L., 3rd Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. J Am Chem Soc, 126, 3 (Jan 28 2004), 698-699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. MacKerell, A. D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack, R. L., Evanseck, J. D., Field, M. J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., Joseph-McCarthy, D., Kuchnir, L., Kuczera, K., Lau, F. T., Mattos, C., Michnick, S., Ngo, T., Nguyen, D. T., Prodhom, B., Reiher, W. E., Roux, B., Schlenkrich, M., Smith, J. C., Stote, R., Straub, J., Watanabe, M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J., Yin, D. and Karplus, M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B, 102, 18 (Apr 30 1998), 3586-3616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBBT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology
    May 2021
    293 pages
    ISBN:9781450389655
    DOI:10.1145/3473258

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format