skip to main content
10.1145/3473258.3473300acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Practice Assessment of Users of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Home Hair-removal Devices in Saudi Arabia

Published:11 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Background: Intense Pulsed light (IPL) hair removal device is a rapidly growing technology with a market extending from clinics to homes where it is unrestrictedly used by the public. IPL safety has been well-established, however, it relies largely on users’ adequacy level in understanding and applying use instructions. Complications were described especially in dark skin types. A few incidents form home use have been reported to Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA). To our knowledge, self-reported home experience of IPL use is not described in the literature. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of IPL home hair-removal female users in Saudi Arabia, their practice, perceptions and complications rate. Methods: a national cross-sectional survey conducted among female residents in Saudi Arabia aged 16 years and above (N=1041). Data was collected using Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI). Descriptive and regression analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Results: the prevalence of IPL home hair-removal female users in Saudi Arabia is 19.5%. Self-reported complications rate was 20.2%. Approximately 10% of the complications were described as severe, yet were not managed by a physician. Observed overall practice in using IPL home devices were scored 60-100% ‘good to excellent’. Following instructions during the removal session was significantly associated with low complications incidence (OR=0.12, 95% CI= 0.01-0.98, P=0.047). Most used brand was Philips 44.3%, and most common purchase venue was online 64%. More than half the users 54.7% expressed having no concerns regarding home IPL devices. Conclusion: There is no concern regarding complications and use adequacy level. Complications rate is significantly associated with proper use. Based on users’ practice scores, use adequacy is considered ‘good to excellent’. Evaluation of users’ knowledge and practice in IPL home hair-removal may be valuable in device classification and regulations.

References

  1. Babilas P, Stephen S, Rolf-Markus S, Micheal L. Intense pulsed light (IPL): A review. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(2):93–104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Town G, Ash C. Do Home-use Hair Removal Lasers and Intense Light Devices Deliver Whar Thet Promise? J Cosmet Surg Med [Internet]. 2010;5(3):48–55. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/118808187/Do-Home-Use-Hair-Removal-Lasers-Intense-Light-Devices-Deliver-What-They-Promise-Godfrey-Town-Caerwyn-AshGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Schmitt L, Rezai K, Karsai S. Are IPL home devices really foolproof? Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Town G, Gorisch W. International progress in standards and regulation for light based home use devices. In: The World's Leading Conference on Laser Safety, ILSC 2013 - International Laser Safety Conference. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Effect of a novel low-energy pulsed-light device for home-use hair removal. Dermatologic Surg. 2009;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Emerson R, Town G. Hair removal with a novel, low fluence, home-use intense pulsed light device. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fodor L, Ullmann Y. Aesthetic applications of intense pulsed light. Aesthetic Applications of Intense Pulsed Light. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mulholland RS. Silk'nTM - A novel device using Home Pulsed LightTM for hair removal at home. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Town G, Ash C. Are home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) devices safe? Lasers Med Sci. 2010;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hair Removal Devices Market Size, Share: Industry Report, 2018-2025. Fortune Business Insight Market Research Report. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lim SPR, Lanigan SW. A review of the adverse effects of laser hair removal. Lasers in Medical Science. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Garden JM, Zelickson B, Gold MH, Friedman D, Kutscher TD, Afsahi V. Home hair removal in all skin types with a combined radiofrequency and optical energy source device. Dermatologic Surg. 2014;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gold MH, Goren H. The Effect of Novel Low Energy Pulsed Light Combined with Galvanic Energy for Home-Use Hair Removal of Dark Skin. J Cosmet Dermatological Sci Appl. 2015;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Town G, Ash C. Measurement of home-use laser and intense pulsed light systems for hair removal: Preliminary report. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBBT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology
    May 2021
    293 pages
    ISBN:9781450389655
    DOI:10.1145/3473258

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format