skip to main content
research-article

Irrelevant Gadgets or a Source of Worry: Exploring Wearable Activity Trackers with Older Adults

Published:19 August 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wearable activity trackers are routinely applied in physical activity (PA) interventions in late life, but there is little research that focuses on older adults' perspectives on the technology. We conducted a qualitative study with 24 older persons to explore their perspective on wearables and PA. First, we discussed their relationship with PA and wearable trackers during focus groups. Next, nine participants crafted prototypes for wearables during co-design sessions. Through Thematic Analysis, we identified two main themes: (1) PA is personal in terms of preferred activities and reasons for PA, and (2) wearables are an emotional technology, causing negative emotions when resembling medical trackers or pressurizing to perform. We followed upon these results through a survey with 41 participants, which further highlighted individual differences in the perception of wearables. We conclude with questions to guide the design of wearables and reflect on their role to support PA in late life.

References

  1. Ryan M. Alturki and Valerie Gay. 2016. A systematic review on what features should be supported by fitness apps and wearables to help users overcome obesity. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 5, 9 (Sept. 2016), 197–206. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/119Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Swamy Ananthanarayan and Katie A. Siek. 2012. Persuasive wearable technology design for health and wellness. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'12) and Workshops. 236–240. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248694ISSN: 2153-1641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stavros Asimakopoulos, Grigorios Asimakopoulos, and Frank Spillers. 2017. Motivation and user engagement in fitness tracking: Heuristics for mobile healthcare wearables. Informatics 4, 1 (March 2017), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4010005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jens Bangsbo, Joanna Blackwell, Carl-Johan Boraxbekk, Paolo Caserotti, Flemming Dela, Adam B. Evans, Astrid Pernille Jespersen, Lasse Gliemann, Arthur F. Kramer, Jesper Lundbye-Jensen, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Aske Juul Lassen, Alan J. Gow, Stephen D. R. Harridge, Ylva Hellsten, Michael Kjaer, Urho M. Kujala, Ryan E. Rhodes, Elizabeth C. J. Pike, Timothy Skinner, Thomas Skovgaard, Jens Troelsen, Emmanuelle Tulle, Mark A. Tully, Jannique G. Z. van Uffelen, and Jose Viña. 2019. Copenhagen consensus statement 2019: Physical activity and ageing. British Journal of Sports Medicine 53, 14 (July 2019), 856–858. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jonathan F. Bean, Ariana Vora, and Walter R. Frontera. 2004. Benefits of exercise for community-dwelling older adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85 (July 2004), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. George Boateng, John A. Batsis, Ryan Halter, and David Kotz. 2017. ActivityAware: An app for real-time daily activity level monitoring on the amulet wrist-worn device. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops'17). 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2017.7917601Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. [n.d.]. Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis. https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (Aug. 2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. José Bravo, Jesús Fontecha, F. J. Navarro, and Ramon Hervas. 2011. A mobile proposal for frailty monitoring by rehabilitation and physical daily activity. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics -Berlin (ICCE-Berlin'11). 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Berlin.2011.6031839ISSN: 2166-6822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pasquale Buonocunto, Andrea Giantomassi, Mauro Marinoni, Davide Calvaresi, and Giorgio Buttazzo. 2018. A limb tracking platform for tele-rehabilitation. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 2, 4 (Sept. 2018), 30:1–30:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fabio Buttussi and Luca Chittaro. 2010. Smarter phones for healthier lifestyles: An adaptive fitness game. IEEE Pervasive Computing 9, 4 (Oct. 2010), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2010.52Conference Name: IEEE Pervasive Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Michele Caldara, Daniele Comotti, Michael Galizzi, Patrick Locatelli, Valerio Re, Dario Alimonti, Marco Poloni, and Maria Cristina Rizzetti. 2014. A novel body sensor network for Parkinson's disease patients rehabilitation assessment. In 2014 11th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2014.28ISSN: 2376-8894.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mariagiovanna Caprara, María Ángeles Molina, Rocío Schettini, Marta Santacreu, Teresa Orosa, Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez, Macarena Rojas, and Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros. 2013. Active Aging Promotion: Results from the Vital Aging Program. Hindawi. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/817813ISSN: 1687-7063Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jo-Ana D. Chase. 2015. Interventions to increase physical activity among older adults: A meta-analysis. The Gerontologist 55, 4 (Aug. 2015), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wojtek J. Chodzko-Zajko, David N. Proctor, Maria A. Fiatarone Singh, Christopher T. Minson, Claudio R. Nigg, George J. Salem, and James S. Skinner. 2009. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 41, 7 (July 2009), 1510–1530. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a0c95cGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W. McDonald, and James A. Landay. 2009. Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive'09). Association for Computing Machinery, Claremont, CA,1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541960Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08). Association for Computing Machinery, 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357335Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Carly Cooper, Anne Gross, Chad Brinkman, Ryan Pope, Kelli Allen, Susan Hastings, Bard E. Bogen, and Adam P. Goode. 2018. The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults. Experimental Gerontology 112 (Oct. 2018), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.08.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michela Cozza, Antonella De Angeli, and Linda Tonolli. 2017. Ubiquitous technologies for older people. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21, 3 (June 2017), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1003-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sara J. Czaja, Walter R. Boot, Neil Charness, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2019. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. 3rd ed. CRC Press. Google-Books-ID: PuiIDwAAQBAJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fred Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (Sept. 1989), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ine D'Haeseleer, Kathrin Gerling, Dominique Schreurs, Bart Vanrumste, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Ageing is not a disease: Pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS'19). Association for Computing Machinery, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Anh Dinh, Daniel Teng, Li Chen, Seok-Bum Ko, Yang Shi, Carl McCrosky, Jenny Basran, and Vanina Del Bello-Hass. 2009. A wearable device for physical activity monitoring with built-in heart rate variability. In 2009 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBBE.2009.5162260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rylee Dionigi. 2006. Competitive sport as leisure in later life: Negotiations, discourse, and aging. Leisure Sciences 28, 2 (2006), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400500484081 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400500484081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Julie Doyle, Cathy Bailey, Ben Dromey, and Cliodhna N. Scanaill. 2010. BASE - An interactive technology solution to deliver balance and strength exercises to older adults. In 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mahzar Eisapour, Shi Cao, Laura Domenicucci, and Jennifer Boger. 2018. Participatory design of a virtual reality exercise for people with mild cognitive impairment. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'18). ACM, New York, NY, CS15:1–CS15:9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3174362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Adam B. Evans, Anne Nistrup, and Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson. 2018. Physical activity across the life course: Socio-cultural approaches. In The Palgrave Handbook of Ageing and Physical Activity Promotion, Samuel R. Nyman, Anna Barker, Terry Haines, Khim Horton, Charles Musselwhite, Geeske Peeters, Christina R. Victor, and Julia Katharina Wolff (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71291-8_27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Adam. B. Evans, Anne Nistrup, and Gertrud Pfister. 2018. Active ageing in Denmark: Shifting institutional landscapes and the intersection of national and local priorities. Journal of Aging Studies 46 (Sept. 2018), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Chloe Fan, Jodi Forlizzi, and Anind Dey. 2012. Considerations for technology that support physical activity by older adults. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS'12). Association for Computing Machinery, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Chloe Fan, Jodi Forlizzi, and Anind K. Dey. 2012. A spark of activity: Exploring informative art as visualization for physical activity. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'12). Association for Computing Machinery, 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370229Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu-Min Fang and Chien-Cheng Chang. 2016. Users' psychological perception and perceived readability of wearable devices for elderly people. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, 3 (March 2016), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1114145_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1114145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Joseph Finkelstein and In C. Jeong. 2013. Design and implementation of home automated telemanagement platform for interactive biking exercise (iBikE HAT). In 2013 IEEE Point-of-Care Healthcare Technologies (PHT'13). 236–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHT.2013.6461328Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Liam Foster and Alan Walker. 2015. Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist 55, 1 (Feb. 2015), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Oscar H. Franco, Chris de Laet, Anna Peeters, Jacqueline Jonker, Johan Mackenbach, and Wilma Nusselder. 2005. Effects of physical activity on life expectancy with cardiovascular disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 165, 20 (Nov. 2005), 2355–2360. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.20.2355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Roxanne Gal, Anne M. May, Elon J. van Overmeeren, Monique Simons, and Evelyn M. Monninkhof. 2018. The effect of physical activity interventions comprising wearables and smartphone applications on physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine - Open 4, 1 (Sept. 2018), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0157-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Paul A. Gardiner, Elizabeth G. Eakin, Genevieve N. Healy, and Neville Owen. 2011. Feasibility of reducing older adults' sedentary time. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 41, 2 (Aug. 2011), 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Nancy A. Garrett, Michelle Brasure, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Monica M. Schultz, and Michael R. Huber. 2004. Physical inactivity: Direct cost to a health plan. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27, 4 (Nov. 2004), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.07.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kathrin Gerling, Mo Ray, Vero Vanden Abeelea, and Brian Adams. 2020. Critical reflections on technology to support physical activity among older adults: An exploration of leading HCI venues. Transactions on Accessible Computing 13, 1 (2020), 1. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/39391/.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kathrin M. Gerling, Regan L. Mandryk, Matthew Miller, Michael R. Kalyn, Max Birk, and Jan D. Smeddinck. 2015. Designing wheelchair-based movement games. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 6, 2, Article 6 (March 2015), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Orestis Giotakos, Katerina Tsirgogianni, and Ioannis Tarnanas. 2007. A virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) scenario for the reduction of fear of falling and balance rehabilitation training of elder adults with hip fracture history. In 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation. 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2007.4362157Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Meridith Griffin. 2015. Physical activity among older adults with visual impairment: Considerations for ageing well with sight loss. In Physical Activity and Sport in Later Life: Critical Perspectives, Emmanuelle Tulle and Cassandra Phoenix (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-42932-2_15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jack M. Guralnik, Luigi Ferrucci, Eleanor M. Simonsick, Marcel E. Salive, and Robert B. Wallace. 1995. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. New England Journal of Medicine 332, 9 (March 1995), 556–562. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199503023320902_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199503023320902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Jack M. Guralnik, Andre Z. LaCroix, Robert D. Abbott, Lisa F. Berkman, Suzanne Satterfield, Denis A. Evans, and Robert B. Wallace. 1993. Maintaining mobility in late life. I. demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. American Journal of Epidemiology 137, 8 (April 1993), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Christina N. Harrington, Lauren Wilcox, Kay Connelly, Wendy Rogers, and Jon Sanford. 2018. Designing health and fitness apps with older adults: Examining the value of experience-based co-design. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240929Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Yihsin Ho, Kouhei Tanaka, Shin Ishiguro, Erin Sato-Shimokawara, and Toru Yamaguchi. 2012. Applying user model as the basis for daily exercise support application. In 2012 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2012.27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Il-Young Jang, Hae Reong Kim, Eunju Lee, Hee-Won Jung, Hyelim Park, Seon-Hee Cheon, Young Soo Lee, and Yu Rang Park. 2018. Impact of a wearable device-based walking programs in rural older adults on physical activity and health outcomes: Cohort study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 6, 11 (2018), e11335. https://doi.org/10.2196/11335Company:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Asangi Jayatilaka, Quoc Hung Dang, Shengjian Jammy Chen, Renuka Visvanathan, Christophe Fumeaux, and Damith C. Ranasinghe. 2019. Designing batteryless wearables for hospitalized older people. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'19). Association for Computing Machinery, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3347740Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacqueline Kerr, Dori Rosenberg, and Lawrence Frank. 2012. The role of the built environment in healthy aging: Community design, physical activity, and health among older adults. Journal of Planning Literature 27, 1 (Feb. 2012), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412211415283Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Sunyoung Kim, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Michael Muller, and Barbara J. Grosz. 2016. Acceptance of mobile technology by older adults: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI'16). Association for Computing Machinery, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935380Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Weisheng Kong, Salvatore Sessa, Sarah Cosentino, Massimiliano Zecca, Kohei Saito, Chunbao Wang, Usama Imtiaz, Zhuohua Lin, Luca Bartolomeo, Hiroyuki Ishii, Tetsuo Ikai, and Atsuo Takanishi. 2013. Development of a real-time IMU-based motion capture system for gait rehabilitation. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO'13). 2100–2105. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2013.6739779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Kenneth Koval, Andrew Chen, Gina Aharonoff, Kenneth Egol, and Joseph Zuckerman. 2004. Clinical pathway for hip fractures in the elderly. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 425 (2004), 72–81. DOI:10.1097/01.blo.0000132266.59787.d2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Nouaying Kue, Kelsey Matthews, Nicholas Paiva, Eugene Chabot, Patricia Burbank, and Ying Sun. 2015. A smartphone based activity analyzer for monitoring and encouraging exercise. In 2015 41st Annual Northeast Biomedical Engineering Conference (NEBEC'15). 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/NEBEC.2015.7117225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Thinh M. Le and Rui Pan. 2009. Accelerometer-based sensor network for fall detection. In 2009 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOCAS.2009.5372032Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Felipe Lobelo, Heval M. Kelli, Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor, Michael Pratt, Michael V. McConnell, Seth S. Martin, and Gregory J. Welk. 2016. The wild wild west: A framework to integrate mHealth software applications and wearables to support physical activity assessment, counseling and interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 58, 6 (May 2016), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2016.02.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Elizabeth J. Lyons, Maria C. Swartz, Zakkoyya H. Lewis, Eloisa Martinez, and Kristofer Jennings. 2017. Feasibility and acceptability of a wearable technology physical activity intervention with telephone counseling for mid-aged and older adults: A randomized controlled pilot trial. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 5, 3 (2017), e28. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Raúl López-López and Mariano Sánchez. 2020. The institutional active aging paradigm in Europe (2002–2015). The Gerontologist 60, 3 (April 2020), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Robert S. Mazzeo, Peter Cavanagh, William J. Evans, Maria Fiatarone, James Hagberg, Edward McAuley, and Jill Startzell. 1998. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 30, 6 (June 1998), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199806000-00033Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Marilyn McGee-Lennon, Aidan Smeaton, and Stephen Brewster. 2012. Designing home care reminder systems: Lessons learned through co-design with older users. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'12) and Workshops. 49–56. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248684ISSN: 2153-1641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Kathryn Mercer, Melissa Li, Lora Giangregorio, Catherine Burns, and Kelly Grindrod. 2016. Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: A critical analysis. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 4, 2 (2016), e40. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Mika Moran, Jelle Van Cauwenberg, Rachel Hercky-Linnewiel, Ester Cerin, Benedicte Deforche, and Pnina Plaut. 2014. Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: A systematic review of qualitative studies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 11, 1 (July 2014), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-79Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. David L. Morgan. 1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22, 1 (1996), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Ruth Mugge, Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein, and Jan P. L. Schoormans. 2010. Product attachment and satisfaction: Understanding consumers' post-purchase behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing 27, 3 (Jan. 2010), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011038347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Miriam E. Nelson, Jack Rejeski, Steven N. Blair, Pamela W. Duncan, and James O. Judge. 2007. Physical activity and public health in older adults: Recommendation from the american college of sports medicine and the american heart association. Circulation 116, 9 (Aug. 2007), 1094–1105. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185650Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Francisco Nunes. 2019. From medicalized to mundane self-care technologies. Interactions 26, 3 (June 2019), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Belén Barros Pena, Lars Erik Holmquist, and Rachel E Clarke. 2021. Circumspect users: Older adults as critical adopters and resistors of technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Frank J. Penedo and Jason R. Dahn. 2005. Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18, 2 (March 2005), 189–193. https://journals.lww.com/co-psychiatry/Abstract/2005/03000/Exercise_and_well_being__a_review_of_mental_and.13.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Robert J. Petrella, Michael W. C. Payne, Andrea R. Myers, Tom J. Overend, and Bert Chesworth. 2000. Physical function and fear of falling after hip fracture rehabilitation in the elderly. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 79 2 (2000), 154–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200003000-00008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Angkoon Phinyomark, Gongrit Chujit, Pornchai Phukpattaranont, Chusak Limsakul, and Huosheng Hu. 2012. A preliminary study assessing time-domain EMG features of classifying exercises in preventing falls in the elderly. In 2012 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2012.6254117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Cassandra Phoenix and Meridith Griffin. 2013. Narratives at work: what can stories of older athletes do?Ageing and Society 33, 2 (2013), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11001103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Cassandra Phoenix and Noreen Orr. 2014. Pleasure: A forgotten dimension of physical activity in older age. Social Science & Medicine 115 (Aug. 2014), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Lukasz Piwek, David A. Ellis, Sally Andrews, and Adam Joinson. 2016. The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLoS Medicine 13, 2 (Feb. 2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Michael Pratt, Caroline A. Macera, and Guijing Wang. 2000. Higher direct medical costs associated with physical inactivity. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 28, 10 (Oct. 2000), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2000.10.1237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Milo Puhan, Lara Siebeling, Leo Beem, and Gerben ter Riet. 2011. Validity and reproducibility of the LASA Physical activity questionnaire (LAPAQ). In A38. Understand the Psychosocial and Behavioral Factors Affecting Outcomes in Lung Disease. American Thoracic Society, A1453–A1453. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_MeetingAbstracts.A1453Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Patrick Shih, Kyungsik Han, Erika Poole, Mary Beth Rosson, and John Carroll. 2015. Use and adoption challenges of wearable activity trackers. In iConference Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). Association for Computing Machinery, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Katta Spiel. 2019. Body-positive computing as a means to counteract normative biases in fitness trackers. XRDS 25, 4 (Summer 2019), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Erwin Tak, Rebecca Kuiper, Astrid Chorus, and Marijke Hopman-Rock. 2013. Prevention of onset and progression of basic ADL disability by physical activity in community dwelling older adults: A meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews 12, 1 (Jan. 2013), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2012.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Masami Takahashi, Hitoshi Kawasaki, Atsuhiko Maeda, and Motonori Nakamura. 2016. Mobile walking game and group-walking program to enhance going out for older adults. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp'16). ACM, New York, NY, 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968415Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Emmanuelle Tulle. 2008. Acting your age? Sports science and the ageing body. Journal of Aging Studies 22, 4 (Dec. 2008), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Bert Vandenberghe, Jasper Vanhoof, Roos Voorend, David Geerts, and Fabienne Dobbels. 2018. The “self” as barrier for self-management technologies in healthcare? In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth'18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Dimitri Vargemidis, Kathrin Gerling, Katta Spiel, Vero Vanden Abeele, and Luc Geurts. 2020. Wearable physical activity-tracking systems for older adults - A systematic review. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare 1, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3402523Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 1, Article 2 (March 2015), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Darren E. R. Warburton, Crystal Whitney Nicol, and Shannon S. D. Bredin. 2006. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ 174, 6 (March 2006), 801–809. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not for me: Older adults choosing not to participate in a social isolation intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16). Association for Computing Machinery, 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. World Health Organization. 2015. Physical Activity and Older Adults. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_olderadults/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Alan Yusheng Wu and Cosmin Munteanu. 2018. Understanding older users' acceptance of wearable interfaces for sensor-based fall risk assessment. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'18). Association for Computing Machinery, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173693Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Irrelevant Gadgets or a Source of Worry: Exploring Wearable Activity Trackers with Older Adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
      ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 14, Issue 3
      September 2021
      199 pages
      ISSN:1936-7228
      EISSN:1936-7236
      DOI:10.1145/3477232
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 August 2021
      • Accepted: 1 June 2021
      • Revised: 1 May 2021
      • Received: 1 December 2020
      Published in taccess Volume 14, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format